SARS-CoV-2感染在卫生保健工作者和行政及支持人员中的流行:南非豪登省茨瓦内区三所学术医院的第一波经验。

IF 1.2
N Mdzinwa, M Voigt, C Janse van Rensburg, F Paruk
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2感染在卫生保健工作者和行政及支持人员中的流行:南非豪登省茨瓦内区三所学术医院的第一波经验。","authors":"N Mdzinwa,&nbsp;M Voigt,&nbsp;C Janse van Rensburg,&nbsp;F Paruk","doi":"10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i11.15938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The availability of well and functional healthcare workers (HCWs) and support staff is pivotal to a country's ability to manage the COVID-19 pandemic effectively. While HCWs have been identified as being at increased risk for acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is a paucity of data pertaining to South African (SA) HCW-related infection rates. Global and provincial disparities in these numbers necessitate local data in order to mitigate risks.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To ascertain the overall SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and outcomes among all hospital staff at three hospitals in the Tshwane district of Gauteng Province, SA, and further determine associations with the development of severe COVID-19 disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective audit was conducted across three academic hospitals in the Tshwane district for the period 1 June - 31 August 2020. Deidentified data from occupational health and safety departments at each hospital were used to calculate infection rates. A more detailed analysis at one of the three hospitals included evaluation of demographics, work description, possible source of SARS-CoV-2 exposure (community or hospital), comorbidities and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The period prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections ranged from 6.1% to 15.4% between the three hospitals, with the average period prevalence being 11.1%. The highest incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was observed among administrative staff (2.8 cases per 1 000 staff days), followed by nursing staff (2.7 cases per 1 000 staff days). Medical doctors had the lowest incidence of 1.1 cases per 1 000 staff days. SARS-CoV-2 infections were categorised as either possibly community or possibly healthcare facility acquired for 26.6% and 73.4% of the infections, respectively. The administrative group had the highest proportion of possible community-acquired infections (41.8%), while doctors had the lowest (6.1%). The mean age of individuals with mild and severe disease was 41 years and 46.1 years, respectively (p=0.004). The presence of comorbidities was significantly associated with severity of disease (p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that hospital staff, including administrative staff, are clearly at high risk for acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection during a surge.</p>","PeriodicalId":520778,"journal":{"name":"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde","volume":" ","pages":"1092-1097"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence in healthcare workers and administrative and support staff: The first-wave experience at three academic hospitals in the Tshwane district of Gauteng Province, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"N Mdzinwa,&nbsp;M Voigt,&nbsp;C Janse van Rensburg,&nbsp;F Paruk\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i11.15938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The availability of well and functional healthcare workers (HCWs) and support staff is pivotal to a country's ability to manage the COVID-19 pandemic effectively. While HCWs have been identified as being at increased risk for acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is a paucity of data pertaining to South African (SA) HCW-related infection rates. Global and provincial disparities in these numbers necessitate local data in order to mitigate risks.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To ascertain the overall SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and outcomes among all hospital staff at three hospitals in the Tshwane district of Gauteng Province, SA, and further determine associations with the development of severe COVID-19 disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective audit was conducted across three academic hospitals in the Tshwane district for the period 1 June - 31 August 2020. Deidentified data from occupational health and safety departments at each hospital were used to calculate infection rates. A more detailed analysis at one of the three hospitals included evaluation of demographics, work description, possible source of SARS-CoV-2 exposure (community or hospital), comorbidities and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The period prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections ranged from 6.1% to 15.4% between the three hospitals, with the average period prevalence being 11.1%. The highest incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was observed among administrative staff (2.8 cases per 1 000 staff days), followed by nursing staff (2.7 cases per 1 000 staff days). Medical doctors had the lowest incidence of 1.1 cases per 1 000 staff days. SARS-CoV-2 infections were categorised as either possibly community or possibly healthcare facility acquired for 26.6% and 73.4% of the infections, respectively. The administrative group had the highest proportion of possible community-acquired infections (41.8%), while doctors had the lowest (6.1%). The mean age of individuals with mild and severe disease was 41 years and 46.1 years, respectively (p=0.004). The presence of comorbidities was significantly associated with severity of disease (p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that hospital staff, including administrative staff, are clearly at high risk for acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection during a surge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1092-1097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i11.15938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i11.15938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:健康和功能良好的卫生保健工作者和支持人员的可用性对于一个国家有效管理COVID-19大流行的能力至关重要。虽然卫生保健工作者被确定为感染SARS-CoV-2的风险增加,但缺乏与南非卫生保健工作者相关的感染率有关的数据。这些数字的全球和各省差异需要当地数据,以减轻风险。目的:了解南非豪登省Tshwane区的三家医院所有医护人员的SARS-CoV-2总体感染率和结果,并进一步确定与重症COVID-19疾病发展的关系。方法:回顾性审计于2020年6月1日至8月31日期间在Tshwane地区的三所学术医院进行。来自各医院职业健康和安全部门的未识别数据用于计算感染率。在三家医院中的一家进行了更详细的分析,包括对人口统计数据、工作描述、可能的SARS-CoV-2暴露源(社区或医院)、合并症和结果的评估。结果:3家医院SARS-CoV-2感染期流行率为6.1% ~ 15.4%,平均期流行率为11.1%。SARS-CoV-2感染发生率最高的是行政人员(每1000个工作日2.8例),其次是护理人员(每1000个工作日2.7例)。医生的发病率最低,为每1 000个工作人员日1.1例。SARS-CoV-2感染分别为26.6%和73.4%,可能为社区感染或可能为医疗机构感染。行政组社区获得性感染比例最高(41.8%),医生组最低(6.1%)。轻、重度患者的平均年龄分别为41岁和46.1岁(p=0.004)。合并症的存在与疾病的严重程度显著相关(p=0.002)。结论:本研究强调,医院工作人员,包括行政人员,显然是在高峰期间获得SARS-CoV-2感染的高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence in healthcare workers and administrative and support staff: The first-wave experience at three academic hospitals in the Tshwane district of Gauteng Province, South Africa.

Background: The availability of well and functional healthcare workers (HCWs) and support staff is pivotal to a country's ability to manage the COVID-19 pandemic effectively. While HCWs have been identified as being at increased risk for acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is a paucity of data pertaining to South African (SA) HCW-related infection rates. Global and provincial disparities in these numbers necessitate local data in order to mitigate risks.

Objectives: To ascertain the overall SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and outcomes among all hospital staff at three hospitals in the Tshwane district of Gauteng Province, SA, and further determine associations with the development of severe COVID-19 disease.

Methods: This retrospective audit was conducted across three academic hospitals in the Tshwane district for the period 1 June - 31 August 2020. Deidentified data from occupational health and safety departments at each hospital were used to calculate infection rates. A more detailed analysis at one of the three hospitals included evaluation of demographics, work description, possible source of SARS-CoV-2 exposure (community or hospital), comorbidities and outcomes.

Results: The period prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections ranged from 6.1% to 15.4% between the three hospitals, with the average period prevalence being 11.1%. The highest incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was observed among administrative staff (2.8 cases per 1 000 staff days), followed by nursing staff (2.7 cases per 1 000 staff days). Medical doctors had the lowest incidence of 1.1 cases per 1 000 staff days. SARS-CoV-2 infections were categorised as either possibly community or possibly healthcare facility acquired for 26.6% and 73.4% of the infections, respectively. The administrative group had the highest proportion of possible community-acquired infections (41.8%), while doctors had the lowest (6.1%). The mean age of individuals with mild and severe disease was 41 years and 46.1 years, respectively (p=0.004). The presence of comorbidities was significantly associated with severity of disease (p=0.002).

Conclusions: This study highlights that hospital staff, including administrative staff, are clearly at high risk for acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection during a surge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信