步态计量分析利用单点惯性测量单位:系统回顾。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2022-01-20 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-21-17
Ralph Jasper Mobbs, Jordan Perring, Suresh Mahendra Raj, Monish Maharaj, Nicole Kah Mun Yoong, Luke Wicent Sy, Rannulu Dineth Fonseka, Pragadesh Natarajan, Wen Jie Choy
{"title":"步态计量分析利用单点惯性测量单位:系统回顾。","authors":"Ralph Jasper Mobbs,&nbsp;Jordan Perring,&nbsp;Suresh Mahendra Raj,&nbsp;Monish Maharaj,&nbsp;Nicole Kah Mun Yoong,&nbsp;Luke Wicent Sy,&nbsp;Rannulu Dineth Fonseka,&nbsp;Pragadesh Natarajan,&nbsp;Wen Jie Choy","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-21-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wearable sensors, particularly accelerometers alone or combined with gyroscopes and magnetometers in an inertial measurement unit (IMU), are a logical alternative for gait analysis. While issues with intrusive and complex sensor placement limit practicality of multi-point IMU systems, single-point IMUs could potentially maximize patient compliance and allow inconspicuous monitoring in daily-living. Therefore, this review aimed to examine the validity of single-point IMUs for gait metrics analysis and identify studies employing them for clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines (PRISMA) were followed utilizing the following databases: PubMed; MEDLINE; EMBASE and Cochrane. Four databases were systematically searched to obtain relevant journal articles focusing on the measurement of gait metrics using single-point IMU sensors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 articles were selected for inclusion. Critical analysis of studies was conducted, and data collected included: sensor type(s); sensor placement; study aim(s); study conclusion(s); gait metrics and methods; and clinical application. Validation research primarily focuses on lower trunk sensors in healthy cohorts. Clinical applications focus on diagnosis and severity assessment, rehabilitation and intervention efficacy and delineating pathological subjects from healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review has demonstrated the validity of single-point IMUs for gait metrics analysis and their ability to assist in clinical scenarios. Further validation for continuous monitoring in daily living scenarios and performance in pathological cohorts is required before commercial and clinical uptake can be expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":" ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800203/pdf/mh-08-21-17.pdf","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait metrics analysis utilizing single-point inertial measurement units: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ralph Jasper Mobbs,&nbsp;Jordan Perring,&nbsp;Suresh Mahendra Raj,&nbsp;Monish Maharaj,&nbsp;Nicole Kah Mun Yoong,&nbsp;Luke Wicent Sy,&nbsp;Rannulu Dineth Fonseka,&nbsp;Pragadesh Natarajan,&nbsp;Wen Jie Choy\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/mhealth-21-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wearable sensors, particularly accelerometers alone or combined with gyroscopes and magnetometers in an inertial measurement unit (IMU), are a logical alternative for gait analysis. While issues with intrusive and complex sensor placement limit practicality of multi-point IMU systems, single-point IMUs could potentially maximize patient compliance and allow inconspicuous monitoring in daily-living. Therefore, this review aimed to examine the validity of single-point IMUs for gait metrics analysis and identify studies employing them for clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines (PRISMA) were followed utilizing the following databases: PubMed; MEDLINE; EMBASE and Cochrane. Four databases were systematically searched to obtain relevant journal articles focusing on the measurement of gait metrics using single-point IMU sensors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 articles were selected for inclusion. Critical analysis of studies was conducted, and data collected included: sensor type(s); sensor placement; study aim(s); study conclusion(s); gait metrics and methods; and clinical application. Validation research primarily focuses on lower trunk sensors in healthy cohorts. Clinical applications focus on diagnosis and severity assessment, rehabilitation and intervention efficacy and delineating pathological subjects from healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review has demonstrated the validity of single-point IMUs for gait metrics analysis and their ability to assist in clinical scenarios. Further validation for continuous monitoring in daily living scenarios and performance in pathological cohorts is required before commercial and clinical uptake can be expected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"mHealth\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800203/pdf/mh-08-21-17.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"mHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-21-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-21-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

背景:可穿戴传感器,特别是加速度计单独或结合陀螺仪和磁力计在惯性测量单元(IMU),是一个合乎逻辑的替代步态分析。虽然侵入性和复杂的传感器放置问题限制了多点IMU系统的实用性,但单点IMU可能最大限度地提高患者的依从性,并允许在日常生活中进行不显眼的监测。因此,本综述旨在检验单点imu用于步态测量分析的有效性,并确定将其用于临床应用的研究。方法:系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目(PRISMA)使用以下数据库:PubMed;MEDLINE;EMBASE和Cochrane。系统地检索了四个数据库,以获得有关使用单点IMU传感器测量步态指标的相关期刊文章。结果:共纳入90篇文献。对研究进行了批判性分析,收集的数据包括:传感器类型;传感器位置;研究目的(s);研究结论(s);步态测量和方法;以及临床应用。验证研究主要集中在健康队列中的下躯干传感器。临床应用主要集中在诊断和严重程度评估、康复和干预效果以及从健康对照中划分病理受试者。讨论:本综述证明了单点imu用于步态测量分析的有效性及其在临床场景中的辅助能力。在商业化和临床应用之前,需要进一步验证在日常生活场景和病理队列中的持续监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gait metrics analysis utilizing single-point inertial measurement units: a systematic review.

Gait metrics analysis utilizing single-point inertial measurement units: a systematic review.

Background: Wearable sensors, particularly accelerometers alone or combined with gyroscopes and magnetometers in an inertial measurement unit (IMU), are a logical alternative for gait analysis. While issues with intrusive and complex sensor placement limit practicality of multi-point IMU systems, single-point IMUs could potentially maximize patient compliance and allow inconspicuous monitoring in daily-living. Therefore, this review aimed to examine the validity of single-point IMUs for gait metrics analysis and identify studies employing them for clinical applications.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines (PRISMA) were followed utilizing the following databases: PubMed; MEDLINE; EMBASE and Cochrane. Four databases were systematically searched to obtain relevant journal articles focusing on the measurement of gait metrics using single-point IMU sensors.

Results: A total of 90 articles were selected for inclusion. Critical analysis of studies was conducted, and data collected included: sensor type(s); sensor placement; study aim(s); study conclusion(s); gait metrics and methods; and clinical application. Validation research primarily focuses on lower trunk sensors in healthy cohorts. Clinical applications focus on diagnosis and severity assessment, rehabilitation and intervention efficacy and delineating pathological subjects from healthy controls.

Discussion: This review has demonstrated the validity of single-point IMUs for gait metrics analysis and their ability to assist in clinical scenarios. Further validation for continuous monitoring in daily living scenarios and performance in pathological cohorts is required before commercial and clinical uptake can be expected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信