G Thandi, A Phillips, N Greenberg, N Maguire, N T Fear
{"title":"对英国退役人员“战士计划”干预的评估。","authors":"G Thandi, A Phillips, N Greenberg, N Maguire, N T Fear","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqab153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has shown that of the myriad services available to veterans in the UK, very few have been independently evaluated. This report presents the results of a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of Time Line Therapy™ delivered by the Warrior Programme (a third-sector organization).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study was aimed to determine if the intervention is effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-design analysis of variance model was used to investigate whether the Warrior Programme had a statistically significant impact on self-reported scores. The intervention and control group provided data on measures prior to and immediately after the intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those in the intervention group (n = 23) reported statistically significant improvements in self-reported scores immediately following intervention: the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) scores (CORE global distress mean difference [MD] = 45.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31-60) (CORE subjective well-being MD = 5.9, 95% CI 3.5-8.3) (CORE functioning MD = 16.7, 95% CI 11.4-21.9) (CORE problems/symptoms MD = 19.4, 95% CI 13.1-25.7), general self-efficacy (MD = -9.8, 95% CI -13.6 to -6.8), anxiety (MD = 8.6, 95% CI 5.2-12.1), depression (MD = 10, 95% CI 6.6-13.5), post-traumatic stress disorder (MD = 26.3, 95% CI 17-25) and functional impairment (MD = 11.1, 95% CI 5.3-16.8) over time, compared to the control group (n = 29). However, score improvement was not sustained over time or statistically significant at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Warrior Programme was effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel immediately after the intervention, but the effect was not sustained at 3-month follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Warrior Programme intervention among UK ex-service personnel.\",\"authors\":\"G Thandi, A Phillips, N Greenberg, N Maguire, N T Fear\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/occmed/kqab153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has shown that of the myriad services available to veterans in the UK, very few have been independently evaluated. This report presents the results of a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of Time Line Therapy™ delivered by the Warrior Programme (a third-sector organization).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study was aimed to determine if the intervention is effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-design analysis of variance model was used to investigate whether the Warrior Programme had a statistically significant impact on self-reported scores. The intervention and control group provided data on measures prior to and immediately after the intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those in the intervention group (n = 23) reported statistically significant improvements in self-reported scores immediately following intervention: the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) scores (CORE global distress mean difference [MD] = 45.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31-60) (CORE subjective well-being MD = 5.9, 95% CI 3.5-8.3) (CORE functioning MD = 16.7, 95% CI 11.4-21.9) (CORE problems/symptoms MD = 19.4, 95% CI 13.1-25.7), general self-efficacy (MD = -9.8, 95% CI -13.6 to -6.8), anxiety (MD = 8.6, 95% CI 5.2-12.1), depression (MD = 10, 95% CI 6.6-13.5), post-traumatic stress disorder (MD = 26.3, 95% CI 17-25) and functional impairment (MD = 11.1, 95% CI 5.3-16.8) over time, compared to the control group (n = 29). However, score improvement was not sustained over time or statistically significant at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Warrior Programme was effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel immediately after the intervention, but the effect was not sustained at 3-month follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"91-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqab153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqab153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:研究表明,在英国为退伍军人提供的无数服务中,很少有经过独立评估的。本报告介绍了一项随机对照试验的结果,该试验评估了勇士计划(第三部门组织)提供的Time Line Therapy™的影响。目的:本研究的目的是为了确定干预是否有效地减少情绪和功能障碍的退役人员。方法:采用混合设计方差分析模型来调查勇士计划是否对自我报告得分有统计学显著影响。干预组和对照组提供了干预前、干预后和3个月随访时的措施数据。结果:干预组(n = 23)的自我报告得分在干预后立即有统计学意义的改善。常规评估(CORE)评分的临床结果(CORE整体痛苦均值差[MD] = 45.0, 95%可信区间[CI] 31-60) (CORE主观幸福感MD = 5.9, 95% CI 3.5-8.3) (CORE功能MD = 16.7, 95% CI 11.4-21.9) (CORE问题/症状MD = 19.4, 95% CI 13.1-25.7),一般自我效能感(MD = -9.8, 95% CI -13.6至-6.8),焦虑(MD = 8.6, 95% CI 5.2-12.1),抑郁(MD = 10, 95% CI 6.6-13.5),创伤后应激障碍(MD = 26.3,95% CI 17-25)和功能损害(MD = 11.1, 95% CI 5.3-16.8)随着时间的推移,与对照组(n = 29)相比。然而,随着时间的推移,评分的改善并没有持续,在随访中也没有统计学意义。结论:“战士计划”在干预后立即有效地减少了退役人员的情绪和功能困难,但在3个月的随访中效果不持续。
Evaluation of the Warrior Programme intervention among UK ex-service personnel.
Background: Research has shown that of the myriad services available to veterans in the UK, very few have been independently evaluated. This report presents the results of a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of Time Line Therapy™ delivered by the Warrior Programme (a third-sector organization).
Aims: This study was aimed to determine if the intervention is effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel.
Methods: A mixed-design analysis of variance model was used to investigate whether the Warrior Programme had a statistically significant impact on self-reported scores. The intervention and control group provided data on measures prior to and immediately after the intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.
Results: Those in the intervention group (n = 23) reported statistically significant improvements in self-reported scores immediately following intervention: the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) scores (CORE global distress mean difference [MD] = 45.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31-60) (CORE subjective well-being MD = 5.9, 95% CI 3.5-8.3) (CORE functioning MD = 16.7, 95% CI 11.4-21.9) (CORE problems/symptoms MD = 19.4, 95% CI 13.1-25.7), general self-efficacy (MD = -9.8, 95% CI -13.6 to -6.8), anxiety (MD = 8.6, 95% CI 5.2-12.1), depression (MD = 10, 95% CI 6.6-13.5), post-traumatic stress disorder (MD = 26.3, 95% CI 17-25) and functional impairment (MD = 11.1, 95% CI 5.3-16.8) over time, compared to the control group (n = 29). However, score improvement was not sustained over time or statistically significant at follow-up.
Conclusions: The Warrior Programme was effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel immediately after the intervention, but the effect was not sustained at 3-month follow-up.