急诊科的雷击头痛综合征:一项国际多中心观察队列研究。

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-10 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2021-211370
Tom Roberts, Daniel E Horner, Kevin Chu, Martin Than, Anne-Maree Kelly, Sharon Klim, Frances Kinnear, Gerben Keijzers, Mehmet Akif Karamercan, Tissa Wijeratne, Sinan Kamona, Win Sen Kuan, Colin A Graham, Richard Body, Said Laribi
{"title":"急诊科的雷击头痛综合征:一项国际多中心观察队列研究。","authors":"Tom Roberts,&nbsp;Daniel E Horner,&nbsp;Kevin Chu,&nbsp;Martin Than,&nbsp;Anne-Maree Kelly,&nbsp;Sharon Klim,&nbsp;Frances Kinnear,&nbsp;Gerben Keijzers,&nbsp;Mehmet Akif Karamercan,&nbsp;Tissa Wijeratne,&nbsp;Sinan Kamona,&nbsp;Win Sen Kuan,&nbsp;Colin A Graham,&nbsp;Richard Body,&nbsp;Said Laribi","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2021-211370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most headache presentations to emergency departments (ED) have benign causes; however, approximately 10% will have serious pathology. International guidelines recommend that patients describing the onset of headache as 'thunderclap' undergo neuroimaging and further investigation. The association of this feature with serious headache cause is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if patients presenting with thunderclap headache are significantly more likely to have serious underlying pathology than patients with more gradual onset and to determine compliance with guidelines for investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a planned secondary analysis of an international, multicentre, observational study of adult ED patients presenting with a main complaint of headache. Data regarding demographics, investigation strategies and final ED diagnoses were collected. Thunderclap headache was defined as severe headache of immediate or almost immediate onset and peak intensity. Proportion of patients with serious pathology in thunderclap and non-thunderclap groups were compared by χ² test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>644 of 4536 patients presented with thunderclap headache (14.2%). CT brain imaging and lumbar puncture were performed in 62.7% and 10.6% of cases, respectively. Among patients with thunderclap headache, serious pathology was identified in 10.9% (95%CI 8.7% to 13.5%) of cases-significantly higher than the proportion found in patients with a different headache onset (6.6% (95% CI 5.9% to 7.4%), p<0.001.). The incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) was 3.6% (95% CI 2.4% to 5.3%) in those with thunderclap headache vs 0.3% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.5%) in those without (p<0.001). All cases of SAH were diagnosed on CT imaging. Non-serious intracranial pathology was diagnosed in 87.7% of patients with thunderclap headache.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thunderclap headache presenting to the ED appears be associated with higher risk for serious intracranial pathology, including SAH, although most patients with this type of headache had a benign cause. Neuroimaging rates did not align with international guidelines, suggesting potential need for further work on standardisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":410922,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","volume":" ","pages":"803-809"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thunderclap headache syndrome presenting to the emergency department: an international multicentre observational cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Tom Roberts,&nbsp;Daniel E Horner,&nbsp;Kevin Chu,&nbsp;Martin Than,&nbsp;Anne-Maree Kelly,&nbsp;Sharon Klim,&nbsp;Frances Kinnear,&nbsp;Gerben Keijzers,&nbsp;Mehmet Akif Karamercan,&nbsp;Tissa Wijeratne,&nbsp;Sinan Kamona,&nbsp;Win Sen Kuan,&nbsp;Colin A Graham,&nbsp;Richard Body,&nbsp;Said Laribi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2021-211370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most headache presentations to emergency departments (ED) have benign causes; however, approximately 10% will have serious pathology. International guidelines recommend that patients describing the onset of headache as 'thunderclap' undergo neuroimaging and further investigation. The association of this feature with serious headache cause is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if patients presenting with thunderclap headache are significantly more likely to have serious underlying pathology than patients with more gradual onset and to determine compliance with guidelines for investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a planned secondary analysis of an international, multicentre, observational study of adult ED patients presenting with a main complaint of headache. Data regarding demographics, investigation strategies and final ED diagnoses were collected. Thunderclap headache was defined as severe headache of immediate or almost immediate onset and peak intensity. Proportion of patients with serious pathology in thunderclap and non-thunderclap groups were compared by χ² test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>644 of 4536 patients presented with thunderclap headache (14.2%). CT brain imaging and lumbar puncture were performed in 62.7% and 10.6% of cases, respectively. Among patients with thunderclap headache, serious pathology was identified in 10.9% (95%CI 8.7% to 13.5%) of cases-significantly higher than the proportion found in patients with a different headache onset (6.6% (95% CI 5.9% to 7.4%), p<0.001.). The incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) was 3.6% (95% CI 2.4% to 5.3%) in those with thunderclap headache vs 0.3% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.5%) in those without (p<0.001). All cases of SAH were diagnosed on CT imaging. Non-serious intracranial pathology was diagnosed in 87.7% of patients with thunderclap headache.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thunderclap headache presenting to the ED appears be associated with higher risk for serious intracranial pathology, including SAH, although most patients with this type of headache had a benign cause. Neuroimaging rates did not align with international guidelines, suggesting potential need for further work on standardisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":410922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"803-809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-211370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-211370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数到急诊科(ED)就诊的头痛有良性原因;然而,大约10%的人会有严重的病理。国际指南建议将头痛发作描述为“雷击”的患者接受神经成像和进一步调查。这一特征与严重头痛病因的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定以雷击头痛为表现的患者是否比逐渐发病的患者更有可能有严重的潜在病理,并确定调查指南的依从性。方法:这是一项针对以头痛为主诉的成人ED患者的国际多中心观察性研究的计划二级分析。收集有关人口统计学、调查策略和最终ED诊断的数据。雷击头痛被定义为立即或几乎立即发作并达到峰值强度的严重头痛。雷击组与非雷击组严重病理患者比例比较采用χ 2检验。结果:4536例患者中有644例(14.2%)出现雷击性头痛。CT脑显像和腰椎穿刺分别占62.7%和10.6%。在雷击头痛患者中,10.9% (95%CI 8.7%至13.5%)的病例中发现了严重的病理,显著高于其他头痛发病患者的比例(6.6% (95%CI 5.9%至7.4%)。结论:出现在ED的雷击头痛似乎与严重颅内病理(包括SAH)的高风险相关,尽管大多数此类头痛患者的病因是良性的。神经显像率与国际指导方针不一致,这表明可能需要进一步的标准化工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thunderclap headache syndrome presenting to the emergency department: an international multicentre observational cohort study.

Background: Most headache presentations to emergency departments (ED) have benign causes; however, approximately 10% will have serious pathology. International guidelines recommend that patients describing the onset of headache as 'thunderclap' undergo neuroimaging and further investigation. The association of this feature with serious headache cause is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine if patients presenting with thunderclap headache are significantly more likely to have serious underlying pathology than patients with more gradual onset and to determine compliance with guidelines for investigation.

Methods: This was a planned secondary analysis of an international, multicentre, observational study of adult ED patients presenting with a main complaint of headache. Data regarding demographics, investigation strategies and final ED diagnoses were collected. Thunderclap headache was defined as severe headache of immediate or almost immediate onset and peak intensity. Proportion of patients with serious pathology in thunderclap and non-thunderclap groups were compared by χ² test.

Results: 644 of 4536 patients presented with thunderclap headache (14.2%). CT brain imaging and lumbar puncture were performed in 62.7% and 10.6% of cases, respectively. Among patients with thunderclap headache, serious pathology was identified in 10.9% (95%CI 8.7% to 13.5%) of cases-significantly higher than the proportion found in patients with a different headache onset (6.6% (95% CI 5.9% to 7.4%), p<0.001.). The incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) was 3.6% (95% CI 2.4% to 5.3%) in those with thunderclap headache vs 0.3% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.5%) in those without (p<0.001). All cases of SAH were diagnosed on CT imaging. Non-serious intracranial pathology was diagnosed in 87.7% of patients with thunderclap headache.

Conclusions: Thunderclap headache presenting to the ED appears be associated with higher risk for serious intracranial pathology, including SAH, although most patients with this type of headache had a benign cause. Neuroimaging rates did not align with international guidelines, suggesting potential need for further work on standardisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信