以2019冠状病毒病大流行为契机,在头痛专科中心通过护士协调的多学科模式改善医疗保健:远程医疗协议的实施。

Valeria Caponnetto, Raffaele Ornello, Eleonora De Matteis, Sara Consilia Papavero, Andrea Fracasso, Giovanni Di Vito, Loreto Lancia, Fabrizio Massimo Ferrara, Simona Sacco
{"title":"以2019冠状病毒病大流行为契机,在头痛专科中心通过护士协调的多学科模式改善医疗保健:远程医疗协议的实施。","authors":"Valeria Caponnetto,&nbsp;Raffaele Ornello,&nbsp;Eleonora De Matteis,&nbsp;Sara Consilia Papavero,&nbsp;Andrea Fracasso,&nbsp;Giovanni Di Vito,&nbsp;Loreto Lancia,&nbsp;Fabrizio Massimo Ferrara,&nbsp;Simona Sacco","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Due to coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italian outpatient clinics were suspended in March-April 2020 and subsequently slowed down. Telemedicine was shown to be useful in headache clinics, despite absence of a detailed protocol for its development. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To describe the implementation of a structured telemedicine protocol during COVID-19 pandemic. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Since May 2020, we performed a quality improvement study in a Headache Specialist Center in central Italy. We involved patients who had in-person follow-up visits scheduled during suspension and initial reopening of clinics. Patients had two appointments with a nurse specialized in headache care and a headache physician, respectively, using Microsoft Teams<sup>®</sup>. The service is still active. We collected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients, technical details of telemedicine visits, patient feedback, medical judgment about complexity of clinical decisions, and need for in-person re-evaluation. We also performed a Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats analysis to provide a realistic picture of the service. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We performed 207 telemedicine visits involving 100 patients with a median age of 44 (interquartile range [IQR]: 35-56) years; 76.0% were women and lived at a median of 68 (IQR: 24-109) km from the Center. Thirty-nine (39.0%) were visited for migraine without aura. Patients mostly used a computer (68.1% visits) with high audio-video quality in 93.2% of visits. First and second appointments lasted in median 20 (IQR: 14-25) minutes and 9 (IQR: 7-13) minutes, respectively. Interacting with patients was very easy in 66.7% of visits. Patients reported no difficulty in sharing documents and high satisfaction in 78.6% and 93.5% of visits, respectively. Perceived complexity of clinical decisions was generally low (86.5%), whereas 8.2% of cases required in-person re-evaluation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Telemedicine facilitated follow-ups, ensuring multidisciplinary care and high patient satisfaction, justifying its wider adoption in headache care.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1016-1022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Opportunity to Improve Health Care Through a Nurse-Coordinated Multidisciplinary Model in a Headache Specialist Center: The Implementation of a Telemedicine Protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Valeria Caponnetto,&nbsp;Raffaele Ornello,&nbsp;Eleonora De Matteis,&nbsp;Sara Consilia Papavero,&nbsp;Andrea Fracasso,&nbsp;Giovanni Di Vito,&nbsp;Loreto Lancia,&nbsp;Fabrizio Massimo Ferrara,&nbsp;Simona Sacco\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2021.0414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Due to coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italian outpatient clinics were suspended in March-April 2020 and subsequently slowed down. Telemedicine was shown to be useful in headache clinics, despite absence of a detailed protocol for its development. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To describe the implementation of a structured telemedicine protocol during COVID-19 pandemic. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Since May 2020, we performed a quality improvement study in a Headache Specialist Center in central Italy. We involved patients who had in-person follow-up visits scheduled during suspension and initial reopening of clinics. Patients had two appointments with a nurse specialized in headache care and a headache physician, respectively, using Microsoft Teams<sup>®</sup>. The service is still active. We collected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients, technical details of telemedicine visits, patient feedback, medical judgment about complexity of clinical decisions, and need for in-person re-evaluation. We also performed a Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats analysis to provide a realistic picture of the service. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We performed 207 telemedicine visits involving 100 patients with a median age of 44 (interquartile range [IQR]: 35-56) years; 76.0% were women and lived at a median of 68 (IQR: 24-109) km from the Center. Thirty-nine (39.0%) were visited for migraine without aura. Patients mostly used a computer (68.1% visits) with high audio-video quality in 93.2% of visits. First and second appointments lasted in median 20 (IQR: 14-25) minutes and 9 (IQR: 7-13) minutes, respectively. Interacting with patients was very easy in 66.7% of visits. Patients reported no difficulty in sharing documents and high satisfaction in 78.6% and 93.5% of visits, respectively. Perceived complexity of clinical decisions was generally low (86.5%), whereas 8.2% of cases required in-person re-evaluation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Telemedicine facilitated follow-ups, ensuring multidisciplinary care and high patient satisfaction, justifying its wider adoption in headache care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1016-1022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:由于冠状病毒病-19 (COVID-19)大流行,意大利门诊诊所于2020年3月至4月暂停,随后放缓。尽管缺乏详细的发展方案,但远程医疗已被证明在头痛诊所是有用的。目的:介绍新冠肺炎大流行期间结构化远程医疗协议的实施情况。材料和方法:自2020年5月以来,我们在意大利中部的头痛专家中心进行了一项质量改进研究。我们的研究对象是在诊所暂停和最初重新开放期间安排了亲自随访的患者。患者分别使用Microsoft Teams®与专门从事头痛护理的护士和头痛医生进行了两次预约。服务仍处于活动状态。我们收集了患者的社会人口学和临床特征、远程医疗访问的技术细节、患者反馈、关于临床决策复杂性的医学判断以及面对面重新评估的需求。我们还进行了优势-劣势-机会-威胁分析,以提供该服务的实际情况。结果:我们进行了207次远程医疗就诊,涉及100例患者,中位年龄为44岁(四分位数间距[IQR]: 35-56岁);76.0%为女性,居住在距离中心68公里(IQR: 24-109)处。39例(39.0%)为无先兆偏头痛。患者主要使用电脑(68.1%),音视频质量高的占93.2%。第一次和第二次就诊的中位数分别为20 (IQR: 14-25)分钟和9 (IQR: 7-13)分钟。66.7%的访视患者与患者的互动非常容易。78.6%和93.5%的患者表示共享文件没有困难,满意度很高。临床决策的感知复杂性通常较低(86.5%),而8.2%的病例需要亲自重新评估。结论:远程医疗促进了随访,确保了多学科护理和高患者满意度,值得在头痛护理中广泛采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Opportunity to Improve Health Care Through a Nurse-Coordinated Multidisciplinary Model in a Headache Specialist Center: The Implementation of a Telemedicine Protocol.

Background: Due to coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italian outpatient clinics were suspended in March-April 2020 and subsequently slowed down. Telemedicine was shown to be useful in headache clinics, despite absence of a detailed protocol for its development. Objective: To describe the implementation of a structured telemedicine protocol during COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Since May 2020, we performed a quality improvement study in a Headache Specialist Center in central Italy. We involved patients who had in-person follow-up visits scheduled during suspension and initial reopening of clinics. Patients had two appointments with a nurse specialized in headache care and a headache physician, respectively, using Microsoft Teams®. The service is still active. We collected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients, technical details of telemedicine visits, patient feedback, medical judgment about complexity of clinical decisions, and need for in-person re-evaluation. We also performed a Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats analysis to provide a realistic picture of the service. Results: We performed 207 telemedicine visits involving 100 patients with a median age of 44 (interquartile range [IQR]: 35-56) years; 76.0% were women and lived at a median of 68 (IQR: 24-109) km from the Center. Thirty-nine (39.0%) were visited for migraine without aura. Patients mostly used a computer (68.1% visits) with high audio-video quality in 93.2% of visits. First and second appointments lasted in median 20 (IQR: 14-25) minutes and 9 (IQR: 7-13) minutes, respectively. Interacting with patients was very easy in 66.7% of visits. Patients reported no difficulty in sharing documents and high satisfaction in 78.6% and 93.5% of visits, respectively. Perceived complexity of clinical decisions was generally low (86.5%), whereas 8.2% of cases required in-person re-evaluation. Conclusions: Telemedicine facilitated follow-ups, ensuring multidisciplinary care and high patient satisfaction, justifying its wider adoption in headache care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信