{"title":"展示全球剖腹产率模型(C-模型)和罗布森分类法在估算和描述住院剖腹产数量过多方面的应用情况","authors":"John Jairo Zuleta-Tobón","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To carry out an academic exercise based on real local data regarding the application of the C-Model v1.0 to determine how data are gathered and used to generate the model, how the model is applied in order to identify potential excess numbers of cesarean sections in an institution, and when identified, how the model is applied to distribute deliveries according to the Robson Classification system and explain excess numbers.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The standardized ratio and absolute difference between the observed proportion and the expected probability of c-sections according to the C-Model v1.0 were estimated for each institution using real databases of five hospitals in Colombia. Convenience selection was used to meet the objectives. Based on the assumptions underpinning group distributions according to the Robson classification, proposed explanations for excess numbers and differences among institutions are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applying the C-Model, the c-section standardized ratio identified different excess numbers of the procedure in the presence of similar institutional c-section proportions. Important variability was found in the proportion of c-sections among women with similar clinical and obstetric characteristics, which might explain the excess numbers identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The C-Model allows to estimate expected c-section proportions according to the specific characteristics of the women seen at each institution; their distribution according to the Robson Classification is a way to explore the origin and particulars of those differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/27/2463-0225-rcog-72-04-3649.PMC8833240.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demonstration of the application of the global cesarean section rate model (C-Model) and the Robson Classification to estimate and characterize excess numbers of institutional c-sections\",\"authors\":\"John Jairo Zuleta-Tobón\",\"doi\":\"10.18597/rcog.3649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To carry out an academic exercise based on real local data regarding the application of the C-Model v1.0 to determine how data are gathered and used to generate the model, how the model is applied in order to identify potential excess numbers of cesarean sections in an institution, and when identified, how the model is applied to distribute deliveries according to the Robson Classification system and explain excess numbers.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The standardized ratio and absolute difference between the observed proportion and the expected probability of c-sections according to the C-Model v1.0 were estimated for each institution using real databases of five hospitals in Colombia. Convenience selection was used to meet the objectives. Based on the assumptions underpinning group distributions according to the Robson classification, proposed explanations for excess numbers and differences among institutions are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applying the C-Model, the c-section standardized ratio identified different excess numbers of the procedure in the presence of similar institutional c-section proportions. Important variability was found in the proportion of c-sections among women with similar clinical and obstetric characteristics, which might explain the excess numbers identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The C-Model allows to estimate expected c-section proportions according to the specific characteristics of the women seen at each institution; their distribution according to the Robson Classification is a way to explore the origin and particulars of those differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/27/2463-0225-rcog-72-04-3649.PMC8833240.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:根据当地有关 C-Model v1.0 应用的真实数据开展一项学术研究,以确定如何收集和使用数据来生成模型,如何应用该模型来识别医疗机构中可能存在的过多剖腹产数量,以及在识别后如何应用该模型根据罗布森分类系统来分配分娩量并解释过多数量:方法:利用哥伦比亚五家医院的真实数据库,根据 C-Model v1.0,估算每家医院剖腹产的观察比例与预期概率之间的标准化比率和绝对差值。为达到目标,采用了便利选择法。根据罗布森分类法的分组分布假设,提出了机构间数量过多和差异的解释:结果:应用 C 模型,剖腹产标准化比率发现,在机构剖腹产比例相似的情况下,剖腹产手术的超额数量各不相同。在临床和产科特征相似的产妇中,剖腹产的比例存在很大的差异,这可能是剖腹产数量过多的原因:C-模型可以根据每个医疗机构中产妇的具体特征估算出预期的剖腹产比例;根据罗布森分类法得出的剖腹产比例分布是探究这些差异的起源和细节的一种方法。
Demonstration of the application of the global cesarean section rate model (C-Model) and the Robson Classification to estimate and characterize excess numbers of institutional c-sections
Objective: To carry out an academic exercise based on real local data regarding the application of the C-Model v1.0 to determine how data are gathered and used to generate the model, how the model is applied in order to identify potential excess numbers of cesarean sections in an institution, and when identified, how the model is applied to distribute deliveries according to the Robson Classification system and explain excess numbers.
Methodology: The standardized ratio and absolute difference between the observed proportion and the expected probability of c-sections according to the C-Model v1.0 were estimated for each institution using real databases of five hospitals in Colombia. Convenience selection was used to meet the objectives. Based on the assumptions underpinning group distributions according to the Robson classification, proposed explanations for excess numbers and differences among institutions are presented.
Results: Applying the C-Model, the c-section standardized ratio identified different excess numbers of the procedure in the presence of similar institutional c-section proportions. Important variability was found in the proportion of c-sections among women with similar clinical and obstetric characteristics, which might explain the excess numbers identified.
Conclusion: The C-Model allows to estimate expected c-section proportions according to the specific characteristics of the women seen at each institution; their distribution according to the Robson Classification is a way to explore the origin and particulars of those differences.
期刊介绍:
The Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología was founded in January 1949. It is the Federación Colombiana de Asociaciones de Obstetricia y Ginecología"s official periodic publication (formerly known as the Sociedad Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología). It is published quarterly and the following abbreviation should be used when citing the journal: Rev. Colomb. Obstet. Ginecol. The publication is authorized by Mingobierno resolution 218/1950.