布比卡因用于根管治疗-医生行为和患者观点:调查研究。

IF 1.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2022-02-03 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S339238
Ozge Erdogan, Sharon M Casey, Nikita B Ruparel, Asgeir Sigurdsson
{"title":"布比卡因用于根管治疗-医生行为和患者观点:调查研究。","authors":"Ozge Erdogan,&nbsp;Sharon M Casey,&nbsp;Nikita B Ruparel,&nbsp;Asgeir Sigurdsson","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S339238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Local anesthesia is essential in dentistry in providing intraoperative analgesia and anesthesia. However, knowledge related to its use for management of post-operative pain is limited. Perioperative pain management is especially important for root canal treatment (ie, endodontic therapy), performed by endodontists. In this study, we sought to better understand endodontists' attitudes regarding the use of long-lasting anesthetic, namely 0.5% bupivacaine HCl with 1:200,000 epinephrine, for the management of post-endodontic pain. Additionally, we aimed to understand the perspectives of dental patients about receiving longer lasting anesthesia for endodontic therapy and to determine factors that affect their anesthetic preferences within the orofacial region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An email invitation to participate in an anonymous online survey was sent to members of the American Association of Endodontists. Also, 82 patients attending an in-person visit to an endodontic clinic were recruited to the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 474 endodontic practitioners and 82 patients included in analysis. Among practitioners, the majority reported to either never (33.31%) or rarely (34.84%) using bupivacaine. Most chose \"I don't think I need it\" (47%) and \"patient discomfort because of longer duration of soft tissue anesthesia\" (30.81%) as reasons for not preferring the use of bupivacaine. Of the practitioners who reported at least rare use, most chose bupivacaine for post-operative pain management (78.02%). Conversely, 52% of patients reported that they were likely/most likely to request long-lasting anesthetics for post-operative pain control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bupivacaine is rarely used as a post-operative pain management strategy for endodontic therapy. Specifically, bupivacaine is not preferred not because of adverse events, toxicity, or slow onset concerns, but rather, because of longer duration of soft tissue anesthesia. However, our data suggest that patients may be willing to receive long-lasting anesthesia. Further patient-centered research should investigate the use of long-lasting anesthetic agents for management of post-endodontic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"11-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4a/6f/lra-15-11.PMC8820451.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bupivacaine for Root Canal Treatment - Practitioner Behaviors and Patient Perspectives: Survey Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Ozge Erdogan,&nbsp;Sharon M Casey,&nbsp;Nikita B Ruparel,&nbsp;Asgeir Sigurdsson\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/LRA.S339238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Local anesthesia is essential in dentistry in providing intraoperative analgesia and anesthesia. However, knowledge related to its use for management of post-operative pain is limited. Perioperative pain management is especially important for root canal treatment (ie, endodontic therapy), performed by endodontists. In this study, we sought to better understand endodontists' attitudes regarding the use of long-lasting anesthetic, namely 0.5% bupivacaine HCl with 1:200,000 epinephrine, for the management of post-endodontic pain. Additionally, we aimed to understand the perspectives of dental patients about receiving longer lasting anesthesia for endodontic therapy and to determine factors that affect their anesthetic preferences within the orofacial region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An email invitation to participate in an anonymous online survey was sent to members of the American Association of Endodontists. Also, 82 patients attending an in-person visit to an endodontic clinic were recruited to the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 474 endodontic practitioners and 82 patients included in analysis. Among practitioners, the majority reported to either never (33.31%) or rarely (34.84%) using bupivacaine. Most chose \\\"I don't think I need it\\\" (47%) and \\\"patient discomfort because of longer duration of soft tissue anesthesia\\\" (30.81%) as reasons for not preferring the use of bupivacaine. Of the practitioners who reported at least rare use, most chose bupivacaine for post-operative pain management (78.02%). Conversely, 52% of patients reported that they were likely/most likely to request long-lasting anesthetics for post-operative pain control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bupivacaine is rarely used as a post-operative pain management strategy for endodontic therapy. Specifically, bupivacaine is not preferred not because of adverse events, toxicity, or slow onset concerns, but rather, because of longer duration of soft tissue anesthesia. However, our data suggest that patients may be willing to receive long-lasting anesthesia. Further patient-centered research should investigate the use of long-lasting anesthetic agents for management of post-endodontic pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4a/6f/lra-15-11.PMC8820451.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S339238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S339238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介和目的:局部麻醉在牙科手术中提供术中镇痛和麻醉是必不可少的。然而,有关其用于治疗术后疼痛的知识是有限的。围手术期疼痛管理对于由牙髓医生进行的根管治疗(即牙髓治疗)尤为重要。在这项研究中,我们试图更好地了解牙髓医生对使用长效麻醉剂的态度,即0.5%盐酸布比卡因和1:20万肾上腺素,用于治疗牙髓后疼痛。此外,我们的目的是了解牙科患者对接受更长时间麻醉进行牙髓治疗的看法,并确定影响他们在口腔面部区域麻醉偏好的因素。方法:通过电子邮件邀请美国牙髓医师协会会员参与匿名在线调查。此外,研究还招募了82名到牙髓诊所亲自就诊的患者。结果:474名根管从业者和82名患者的数据纳入分析。在从业人员中,大多数报告从未(33.31%)或很少(34.84%)使用布比卡因。大多数选择“我认为我不需要”(47%)和“软组织麻醉时间较长导致患者不适”(30.81%)作为不喜欢使用布比卡因的原因。在报告至少很少使用布比卡因的从业人员中,大多数选择布比卡因用于术后疼痛管理(78.02%)。相反,52%的患者报告说他们很可能/最有可能要求使用长效麻醉剂来控制术后疼痛。结论:布比卡因很少用于根管治疗的术后疼痛管理策略。具体来说,布比卡因不是首选不是因为不良事件,毒性,或慢起的问题,而是因为更长的软组织麻醉持续时间。然而,我们的数据表明患者可能愿意接受长期麻醉。进一步以患者为中心的研究应该探讨使用长效麻醉剂来治疗牙髓后疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bupivacaine for Root Canal Treatment - Practitioner Behaviors and Patient Perspectives: Survey Studies.

Bupivacaine for Root Canal Treatment - Practitioner Behaviors and Patient Perspectives: Survey Studies.

Bupivacaine for Root Canal Treatment - Practitioner Behaviors and Patient Perspectives: Survey Studies.

Introduction and objectives: Local anesthesia is essential in dentistry in providing intraoperative analgesia and anesthesia. However, knowledge related to its use for management of post-operative pain is limited. Perioperative pain management is especially important for root canal treatment (ie, endodontic therapy), performed by endodontists. In this study, we sought to better understand endodontists' attitudes regarding the use of long-lasting anesthetic, namely 0.5% bupivacaine HCl with 1:200,000 epinephrine, for the management of post-endodontic pain. Additionally, we aimed to understand the perspectives of dental patients about receiving longer lasting anesthesia for endodontic therapy and to determine factors that affect their anesthetic preferences within the orofacial region.

Methods: An email invitation to participate in an anonymous online survey was sent to members of the American Association of Endodontists. Also, 82 patients attending an in-person visit to an endodontic clinic were recruited to the study.

Results: Data from 474 endodontic practitioners and 82 patients included in analysis. Among practitioners, the majority reported to either never (33.31%) or rarely (34.84%) using bupivacaine. Most chose "I don't think I need it" (47%) and "patient discomfort because of longer duration of soft tissue anesthesia" (30.81%) as reasons for not preferring the use of bupivacaine. Of the practitioners who reported at least rare use, most chose bupivacaine for post-operative pain management (78.02%). Conversely, 52% of patients reported that they were likely/most likely to request long-lasting anesthetics for post-operative pain control.

Conclusion: Bupivacaine is rarely used as a post-operative pain management strategy for endodontic therapy. Specifically, bupivacaine is not preferred not because of adverse events, toxicity, or slow onset concerns, but rather, because of longer duration of soft tissue anesthesia. However, our data suggest that patients may be willing to receive long-lasting anesthesia. Further patient-centered research should investigate the use of long-lasting anesthetic agents for management of post-endodontic pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信