covid -19相关凝血病的血栓预防:下一步是什么?

Viktor Čulić, Riccardo Vio, Riccardo Proietti
{"title":"covid -19相关凝血病的血栓预防:下一步是什么?","authors":"Viktor Čulić, Riccardo Vio, Riccardo Proietti","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at high risk for microand macrovascular thromboembolic events due to thromboinflammation and the coagulopathy caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).1,2 Because of its proven anticoagulation effect, coupled with possible antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects, heparin was the first candidate for prevention of adverse events in COVID-19 patients.2 Yet, a recent meta-analysis of seven clinical trials using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin suggests no difference in all-cause death between the therapeutic-, i.e. escalated, and standard-dose anticoagulation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients without a formal indication for anticoagulation therapy.3 The escalated dose significantly reduced the rates of pulmonary and other venous thromboembolism, but was associated with a higher bleeding risk.3 The findings were consistent with regard to the disease severity (critically vs. non-critically ill COVID-19 patients).3 It is important to note that the aforementioned meta-analyis3 did not include the most recent HEP-COVID trial,4 the first randomized trial using a classic antithrombotic clinical trial design. This trial, similarly to another important report by the REMAP-CAP, ACTIV4a, and ATTACC Investigators,5 suggests that therapeutic-dose LMWH reduced the risk of thromboembolism and death in non-critically ill patients. These two well-designed studies strongly suggest the use of escalated anticoagulation in this group of hospitalized patients, particularly with elevated D-dimer levels. In contrast, current data agree that escalation of heparin dose in critically ill COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care unit treatment provides no benefit,3,4,6 so the anticoagulation strategy in such patients is uncertain. In addition to coagulopathy, hyperinflammation, and endothelial disruption, mechanisms responsible for the lack of a beneficial effect in critically ill patients may include lung-related mechanisms. First, therapeutic-dose anticoagulation may exacerbate alveolar haemorrhage in patients with severe pulmonary inflammation.6 Second, the processes of intra-alveolar coagulation that through isolation of pulmonary pathogens may","PeriodicalId":11995,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"E18-E19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9383404/pdf/pvac009.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thromboprophylaxis for COVID-19-related coagulopathy: what next?\",\"authors\":\"Viktor Čulić, Riccardo Vio, Riccardo Proietti\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at high risk for microand macrovascular thromboembolic events due to thromboinflammation and the coagulopathy caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).1,2 Because of its proven anticoagulation effect, coupled with possible antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects, heparin was the first candidate for prevention of adverse events in COVID-19 patients.2 Yet, a recent meta-analysis of seven clinical trials using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin suggests no difference in all-cause death between the therapeutic-, i.e. escalated, and standard-dose anticoagulation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients without a formal indication for anticoagulation therapy.3 The escalated dose significantly reduced the rates of pulmonary and other venous thromboembolism, but was associated with a higher bleeding risk.3 The findings were consistent with regard to the disease severity (critically vs. non-critically ill COVID-19 patients).3 It is important to note that the aforementioned meta-analyis3 did not include the most recent HEP-COVID trial,4 the first randomized trial using a classic antithrombotic clinical trial design. This trial, similarly to another important report by the REMAP-CAP, ACTIV4a, and ATTACC Investigators,5 suggests that therapeutic-dose LMWH reduced the risk of thromboembolism and death in non-critically ill patients. These two well-designed studies strongly suggest the use of escalated anticoagulation in this group of hospitalized patients, particularly with elevated D-dimer levels. In contrast, current data agree that escalation of heparin dose in critically ill COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care unit treatment provides no benefit,3,4,6 so the anticoagulation strategy in such patients is uncertain. In addition to coagulopathy, hyperinflammation, and endothelial disruption, mechanisms responsible for the lack of a beneficial effect in critically ill patients may include lung-related mechanisms. First, therapeutic-dose anticoagulation may exacerbate alveolar haemorrhage in patients with severe pulmonary inflammation.6 Second, the processes of intra-alveolar coagulation that through isolation of pulmonary pathogens may\",\"PeriodicalId\":11995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E18-E19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9383404/pdf/pvac009.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thromboprophylaxis for COVID-19-related coagulopathy: what next?
Patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at high risk for microand macrovascular thromboembolic events due to thromboinflammation and the coagulopathy caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).1,2 Because of its proven anticoagulation effect, coupled with possible antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects, heparin was the first candidate for prevention of adverse events in COVID-19 patients.2 Yet, a recent meta-analysis of seven clinical trials using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin suggests no difference in all-cause death between the therapeutic-, i.e. escalated, and standard-dose anticoagulation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients without a formal indication for anticoagulation therapy.3 The escalated dose significantly reduced the rates of pulmonary and other venous thromboembolism, but was associated with a higher bleeding risk.3 The findings were consistent with regard to the disease severity (critically vs. non-critically ill COVID-19 patients).3 It is important to note that the aforementioned meta-analyis3 did not include the most recent HEP-COVID trial,4 the first randomized trial using a classic antithrombotic clinical trial design. This trial, similarly to another important report by the REMAP-CAP, ACTIV4a, and ATTACC Investigators,5 suggests that therapeutic-dose LMWH reduced the risk of thromboembolism and death in non-critically ill patients. These two well-designed studies strongly suggest the use of escalated anticoagulation in this group of hospitalized patients, particularly with elevated D-dimer levels. In contrast, current data agree that escalation of heparin dose in critically ill COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care unit treatment provides no benefit,3,4,6 so the anticoagulation strategy in such patients is uncertain. In addition to coagulopathy, hyperinflammation, and endothelial disruption, mechanisms responsible for the lack of a beneficial effect in critically ill patients may include lung-related mechanisms. First, therapeutic-dose anticoagulation may exacerbate alveolar haemorrhage in patients with severe pulmonary inflammation.6 Second, the processes of intra-alveolar coagulation that through isolation of pulmonary pathogens may
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信