分析前样品制备对腹膜组织药物浓度测量的影响:一项离体研究。

IF 1.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Pleura and Peritoneum Pub Date : 2021-07-28 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1515/pp-2020-0151
Arianna Castagna, Iaroslav Sautkin, Frank-Jürgen Weinreich, Hannah Heejung Lee, Alfred Königsrainer, Marc André Reymond, Giorgi Nadiradze
{"title":"分析前样品制备对腹膜组织药物浓度测量的影响:一项离体研究。","authors":"Arianna Castagna,&nbsp;Iaroslav Sautkin,&nbsp;Frank-Jürgen Weinreich,&nbsp;Hannah Heejung Lee,&nbsp;Alfred Königsrainer,&nbsp;Marc André Reymond,&nbsp;Giorgi Nadiradze","doi":"10.1515/pp-2020-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Biopsy morphology (surface/depth ratio) and sample processing might affect pharmacological measurements in peritoneal tissue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an <i>ex-vivo</i> study on inverted bovine urinary bladders (IBUB). We compared cisplatin (CIS) and doxorubicin (DOX) concentration in 81 standardized transmural punch biopsies of different diameters (6 and 12 mm). Then, we assessed the effect of dabbing the peritoneal surface before analysis. After automatized tissue homogenization with ceramic beads followed by lyophilisation, DOX concentration was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), CIS concentration by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Experiments were performed in triplicate; the analysis was blinded to the sample origin. Comparisons were performed using non-parametric tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concentrations are given in mean (CI 5-95%). Results were reproducible between experiments (for CIS p=0.783, for DOX p=0.235) and between different localizations within the IBUB (for CIS p=0.032, for DOX p=0.663). Biopsy diameter had an influence on CIS tissue concentration (6 mm biopsies: 23.2 (20.3-26.1), vs. 12 mm biopsies: 8.1 (7.2-9.2) ng/mg, p<0.001) but not on DOX: (0.46, 0.29-0.62) vs. 0.43 (0.33-0.54) ng/mg respectively, p=0.248). Dabbing the peritoneal surface reduced DOX tissue concentration (dry biopsies: 0.28 (0.12-0.43) vs. wet biopsies: 0.64 (0.35-0.93) ng/mg, p=0.025) but not CIS (23.5 (19.0-28.0) vs. 22.9 (18.9-26.9) ng/mg, respectively, p=0.735).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measurements of drug concentration in peritoneal tissue can be influenced by the biopsy's surface/depth ratio and after drying the biopsy's surface<b>.</b> This influence can reach a factor three, depending on the drug tested<b>.</b> The biopsy technique and the pre-analytical sample preparation should be standardized to ensure reliable pharmacological measurements in peritoneal tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0151","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of pre-analytical sample preparation on drug concentration measurements in peritoneal tissue: an <i>ex-vivo</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Arianna Castagna,&nbsp;Iaroslav Sautkin,&nbsp;Frank-Jürgen Weinreich,&nbsp;Hannah Heejung Lee,&nbsp;Alfred Königsrainer,&nbsp;Marc André Reymond,&nbsp;Giorgi Nadiradze\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/pp-2020-0151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Biopsy morphology (surface/depth ratio) and sample processing might affect pharmacological measurements in peritoneal tissue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an <i>ex-vivo</i> study on inverted bovine urinary bladders (IBUB). We compared cisplatin (CIS) and doxorubicin (DOX) concentration in 81 standardized transmural punch biopsies of different diameters (6 and 12 mm). Then, we assessed the effect of dabbing the peritoneal surface before analysis. After automatized tissue homogenization with ceramic beads followed by lyophilisation, DOX concentration was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), CIS concentration by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Experiments were performed in triplicate; the analysis was blinded to the sample origin. Comparisons were performed using non-parametric tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concentrations are given in mean (CI 5-95%). Results were reproducible between experiments (for CIS p=0.783, for DOX p=0.235) and between different localizations within the IBUB (for CIS p=0.032, for DOX p=0.663). Biopsy diameter had an influence on CIS tissue concentration (6 mm biopsies: 23.2 (20.3-26.1), vs. 12 mm biopsies: 8.1 (7.2-9.2) ng/mg, p<0.001) but not on DOX: (0.46, 0.29-0.62) vs. 0.43 (0.33-0.54) ng/mg respectively, p=0.248). Dabbing the peritoneal surface reduced DOX tissue concentration (dry biopsies: 0.28 (0.12-0.43) vs. wet biopsies: 0.64 (0.35-0.93) ng/mg, p=0.025) but not CIS (23.5 (19.0-28.0) vs. 22.9 (18.9-26.9) ng/mg, respectively, p=0.735).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measurements of drug concentration in peritoneal tissue can be influenced by the biopsy's surface/depth ratio and after drying the biopsy's surface<b>.</b> This influence can reach a factor three, depending on the drug tested<b>.</b> The biopsy technique and the pre-analytical sample preparation should be standardized to ensure reliable pharmacological measurements in peritoneal tissue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2020-0151\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleura and Peritoneum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:活检形态学(表面/深度比)和样品处理可能影响腹膜组织的药理学测量。方法:对牛膀胱内翻进行离体研究。我们比较了81例不同直径(6和12 mm)的标准化跨壁穿孔活检中顺铂(CIS)和阿霉素(DOX)的浓度。然后,我们评估了在分析前涂抹腹膜表面的效果。用陶瓷珠对组织进行自动化均质和冻干后,用高效液相色谱(HPLC)测定DOX浓度,用原子吸收光谱测定CIS浓度。实验一式三次;分析对样品的来源是不知情的。采用非参数检验进行比较。结果:浓度平均值(CI 5-95%)。结果在不同实验(CIS p=0.783, DOX p=0.235)和IBUB内不同定位(CIS p=0.032, DOX p=0.663)之间是可重复的。活检直径对CIS组织浓度有影响(6mm活检:23.2(20.3-26.1),而12mm活检:8.1 (7.2-9.2)ng/mg)。结论:腹膜组织中药物浓度的测量可能受到活检的表面/深度比和活检表面干燥后的影响。根据测试的药物,这种影响可以达到三倍。活检技术和分析前样品制备应标准化,以确保可靠的药理学测量在腹膜组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of pre-analytical sample preparation on drug concentration measurements in peritoneal tissue: an <i>ex-vivo</i> study.

Influence of pre-analytical sample preparation on drug concentration measurements in peritoneal tissue: an <i>ex-vivo</i> study.

Influence of pre-analytical sample preparation on drug concentration measurements in peritoneal tissue: an <i>ex-vivo</i> study.

Influence of pre-analytical sample preparation on drug concentration measurements in peritoneal tissue: an ex-vivo study.

Objectives: Biopsy morphology (surface/depth ratio) and sample processing might affect pharmacological measurements in peritoneal tissue.

Methods: This is an ex-vivo study on inverted bovine urinary bladders (IBUB). We compared cisplatin (CIS) and doxorubicin (DOX) concentration in 81 standardized transmural punch biopsies of different diameters (6 and 12 mm). Then, we assessed the effect of dabbing the peritoneal surface before analysis. After automatized tissue homogenization with ceramic beads followed by lyophilisation, DOX concentration was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), CIS concentration by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Experiments were performed in triplicate; the analysis was blinded to the sample origin. Comparisons were performed using non-parametric tests.

Results: Concentrations are given in mean (CI 5-95%). Results were reproducible between experiments (for CIS p=0.783, for DOX p=0.235) and between different localizations within the IBUB (for CIS p=0.032, for DOX p=0.663). Biopsy diameter had an influence on CIS tissue concentration (6 mm biopsies: 23.2 (20.3-26.1), vs. 12 mm biopsies: 8.1 (7.2-9.2) ng/mg, p<0.001) but not on DOX: (0.46, 0.29-0.62) vs. 0.43 (0.33-0.54) ng/mg respectively, p=0.248). Dabbing the peritoneal surface reduced DOX tissue concentration (dry biopsies: 0.28 (0.12-0.43) vs. wet biopsies: 0.64 (0.35-0.93) ng/mg, p=0.025) but not CIS (23.5 (19.0-28.0) vs. 22.9 (18.9-26.9) ng/mg, respectively, p=0.735).

Conclusions: Measurements of drug concentration in peritoneal tissue can be influenced by the biopsy's surface/depth ratio and after drying the biopsy's surface. This influence can reach a factor three, depending on the drug tested. The biopsy technique and the pre-analytical sample preparation should be standardized to ensure reliable pharmacological measurements in peritoneal tissue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信