[萨尔大学眼科医院引入FIDUS电子患者档案后的员工调查]。

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Ophthalmologe Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-27 DOI:10.1007/s00347-021-01514-1
Amine Maamri, Fabian N Fries, Corinna Spira-Eppig, Timo Eppig, Berthold Seitz
{"title":"[萨尔大学眼科医院引入FIDUS电子患者档案后的员工调查]。","authors":"Amine Maamri,&nbsp;Fabian N Fries,&nbsp;Corinna Spira-Eppig,&nbsp;Timo Eppig,&nbsp;Berthold Seitz","doi":"10.1007/s00347-021-01514-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared Saarland University Eye Hospital employees' satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record between December 2016 and September 2020, after its introduction in January 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the retrospective study, the FIDUS team at the Saarland University Eye Hospital created a questionnaire which was distributed to all participants (physicians, nursing staff, and administrative staff) in December 2016 and September 2020. The questionnaire contained 19 questions, each scored from 0 to 10 (0: disagree; 5: partly agree; 10: completely agree).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of participants increased significantly from 60/136 (47%) to 89/140 (64%) between 2016 and 2020. Of these participants, 23 (25.8%) were physicians, 27 (30.3%) were nurses, 12 (13.4%) were in administration, 16 (17.9%) were in other employment, and 11 (12.3%) did not disclose their employment. In 2020, 75.6% of employees agreed with a score of 10 that implementation of electronic medical records was the right step, compared to only 36.7% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The highest rating for \"record entries are faster to write with a computer than handwritten\" was obtained in 38% in 2020 vs. 25% in 2016 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record has improved significantly in 2020 compared to 2016, particularly concerning file clarity and faster workflows. The proportion of respondents who see their initial expectations of electronic patient files as 100% fulfilled has tripled. However, there is still a need for optimization of details.</p>","PeriodicalId":54676,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologe","volume":" ","pages":"471-480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9076743/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Employee survey after introduction of the FIDUS electronic patient file at the Saarland University Eye Hospital].\",\"authors\":\"Amine Maamri,&nbsp;Fabian N Fries,&nbsp;Corinna Spira-Eppig,&nbsp;Timo Eppig,&nbsp;Berthold Seitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00347-021-01514-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared Saarland University Eye Hospital employees' satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record between December 2016 and September 2020, after its introduction in January 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the retrospective study, the FIDUS team at the Saarland University Eye Hospital created a questionnaire which was distributed to all participants (physicians, nursing staff, and administrative staff) in December 2016 and September 2020. The questionnaire contained 19 questions, each scored from 0 to 10 (0: disagree; 5: partly agree; 10: completely agree).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of participants increased significantly from 60/136 (47%) to 89/140 (64%) between 2016 and 2020. Of these participants, 23 (25.8%) were physicians, 27 (30.3%) were nurses, 12 (13.4%) were in administration, 16 (17.9%) were in other employment, and 11 (12.3%) did not disclose their employment. In 2020, 75.6% of employees agreed with a score of 10 that implementation of electronic medical records was the right step, compared to only 36.7% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The highest rating for \\\"record entries are faster to write with a computer than handwritten\\\" was obtained in 38% in 2020 vs. 25% in 2016 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record has improved significantly in 2020 compared to 2016, particularly concerning file clarity and faster workflows. The proportion of respondents who see their initial expectations of electronic patient files as 100% fulfilled has tripled. However, there is still a need for optimization of details.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmologe\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"471-480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9076743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmologe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01514-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologe","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01514-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本研究比较了2016年1月引入FIDUS电子病历后,2016年12月至2020年9月期间萨尔大学眼科医院员工对FIDUS电子病历的满意度。方法:在回顾性研究中,萨尔大学眼科医院的FIDUS团队制作了一份调查问卷,于2016年12月和2020年9月分发给所有参与者(医生、护理人员和行政人员)。问卷包含19个问题,每个问题的得分从0到10(0:不同意;5:部分同意;10:完全同意)。结果:从2016年到2020年,参与者数量从60/136(47%)显著增加到89/140(64%)。在这些参与者中,23人(25.8%)是医生,27人(30.3%)是护士,12人(13.4%)是行政管理人员,16人(17.9%)是其他职业,11人(12.3%)没有透露他们的职业。2020年,75.6%的员工认为实施电子病历是正确的一步,得分为10分,而2016年这一比例仅为36.7% (p 结论:与2016年相比,2020年对FIDUS电子病历的满意度有了显著提高,特别是在文件清晰度和更快的工作流程方面。认为他们最初对电子病历的期望100%实现的受访者比例增加了两倍。但是,还需要对细节进行优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

[Employee survey after introduction of the FIDUS electronic patient file at the Saarland University Eye Hospital].

[Employee survey after introduction of the FIDUS electronic patient file at the Saarland University Eye Hospital].

[Employee survey after introduction of the FIDUS electronic patient file at the Saarland University Eye Hospital].

[Employee survey after introduction of the FIDUS electronic patient file at the Saarland University Eye Hospital].

Aim: This study compared Saarland University Eye Hospital employees' satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record between December 2016 and September 2020, after its introduction in January 2016.

Methods: For the retrospective study, the FIDUS team at the Saarland University Eye Hospital created a questionnaire which was distributed to all participants (physicians, nursing staff, and administrative staff) in December 2016 and September 2020. The questionnaire contained 19 questions, each scored from 0 to 10 (0: disagree; 5: partly agree; 10: completely agree).

Results: The number of participants increased significantly from 60/136 (47%) to 89/140 (64%) between 2016 and 2020. Of these participants, 23 (25.8%) were physicians, 27 (30.3%) were nurses, 12 (13.4%) were in administration, 16 (17.9%) were in other employment, and 11 (12.3%) did not disclose their employment. In 2020, 75.6% of employees agreed with a score of 10 that implementation of electronic medical records was the right step, compared to only 36.7% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The highest rating for "record entries are faster to write with a computer than handwritten" was obtained in 38% in 2020 vs. 25% in 2016 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record has improved significantly in 2020 compared to 2016, particularly concerning file clarity and faster workflows. The proportion of respondents who see their initial expectations of electronic patient files as 100% fulfilled has tripled. However, there is still a need for optimization of details.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmologe
Ophthalmologe 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Ophthalmologe is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of ophthalmology. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of ophthalmologists. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信