弥合差距:家庭和社区医生参与健康问题数字网络。

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Family and Community Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-07 DOI:10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_105_21
Amani M Alqarni, Maha A Almuraisel, Rasha H Alsheikh, Rana S Almansour, Moataza M Abdelwahab
{"title":"弥合差距:家庭和社区医生参与健康问题数字网络。","authors":"Amani M Alqarni,&nbsp;Maha A Almuraisel,&nbsp;Rasha H Alsheikh,&nbsp;Rana S Almansour,&nbsp;Moataza M Abdelwahab","doi":"10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_105_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of social media (SM) is unlocking infinite opportunities for healthcare disciplines and is fast becoming the preferred medium of communication. This underlines the importance of meeting the challenges of this new era. The aim of this study was to assess the readiness of Saudi family medicine physicians to the use of SM in health promotion and to explore their prospective attitudes toward its use professionally.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The two largest hospital-based primary care centers in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia were used for the quantitative analysis. All known physician bloggers in Saudi Arabia from seven different cities were invited to participate in the qualitative aspect of this study. The quantitative component of this study was conducted in the Eastern Province at two main hospitals. A 37-item questionnaire was distributed to all family physicians practising at these hospitals. The qualitative component of this study covered all of Saudi Arabia, and 11 in-depth interviews were held with family physician bloggers, followed by verbatim transcription, content analysis, and coding of the results. Chi-squared and independent <i>t</i>-tests were used. All physicians at the two largest hospitals in the Eastern Province were invited to participate in the quantitative aspect of the study. The response rate was 86.2% (<i>n</i> = 159).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study included 136 primary care physicians; majority were <50 years old (96.3%) with 58.8% females. About 60% were residents and 27.2 % consultants, and 76.5% were were family medicine physicians. Ninety-six percent physicians had SM accounts, the mean use of 3 h per day, 46.3% of the family physicians had good knowledge of SM ethics, and 69.9% used SM professionally for medical issues. Most of the responses showed a strong positive attitude; more than 60% of the participants responded as \"agree\" or \"strongly agree\" to the positive statements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Organizations urgently need to design their own bioethical guidelines and rules on the safe use of SM by healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Community Medicine","volume":"28 3","pages":"181-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/33/JFCM-28-181.PMC8496700.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the gap: Engagement of family and community physicians in digital networks for health issues.\",\"authors\":\"Amani M Alqarni,&nbsp;Maha A Almuraisel,&nbsp;Rasha H Alsheikh,&nbsp;Rana S Almansour,&nbsp;Moataza M Abdelwahab\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_105_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of social media (SM) is unlocking infinite opportunities for healthcare disciplines and is fast becoming the preferred medium of communication. This underlines the importance of meeting the challenges of this new era. The aim of this study was to assess the readiness of Saudi family medicine physicians to the use of SM in health promotion and to explore their prospective attitudes toward its use professionally.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The two largest hospital-based primary care centers in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia were used for the quantitative analysis. All known physician bloggers in Saudi Arabia from seven different cities were invited to participate in the qualitative aspect of this study. The quantitative component of this study was conducted in the Eastern Province at two main hospitals. A 37-item questionnaire was distributed to all family physicians practising at these hospitals. The qualitative component of this study covered all of Saudi Arabia, and 11 in-depth interviews were held with family physician bloggers, followed by verbatim transcription, content analysis, and coding of the results. Chi-squared and independent <i>t</i>-tests were used. All physicians at the two largest hospitals in the Eastern Province were invited to participate in the quantitative aspect of the study. The response rate was 86.2% (<i>n</i> = 159).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study included 136 primary care physicians; majority were <50 years old (96.3%) with 58.8% females. About 60% were residents and 27.2 % consultants, and 76.5% were were family medicine physicians. Ninety-six percent physicians had SM accounts, the mean use of 3 h per day, 46.3% of the family physicians had good knowledge of SM ethics, and 69.9% used SM professionally for medical issues. Most of the responses showed a strong positive attitude; more than 60% of the participants responded as \\\"agree\\\" or \\\"strongly agree\\\" to the positive statements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Organizations urgently need to design their own bioethical guidelines and rules on the safe use of SM by healthcare professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family and Community Medicine\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"181-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/33/JFCM-28-181.PMC8496700.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family and Community Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_105_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_105_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社交媒体(SM)的使用为医疗保健学科打开了无限的机会,并迅速成为首选的沟通媒介。这强调了迎接这个新时代挑战的重要性。本研究的目的是评估沙特家庭医学医生在健康促进中使用SM的准备情况,并探讨他们对专业使用SM的预期态度。材料和方法:使用沙特阿拉伯东部省两个最大的以医院为基础的初级保健中心进行定量分析。沙特阿拉伯七个不同城市的所有知名医生博客被邀请参与本研究的定性方面。这项研究的定量部分是在东部省的两家主要医院进行的。向在这些医院执业的所有家庭医生分发了一份包含37个项目的问卷。本研究的定性部分覆盖了整个沙特阿拉伯,并与家庭医生博主进行了11次深度访谈,随后进行了逐字转录、内容分析和结果编码。采用卡方检验和独立t检验。东部省两家最大医院的所有医生都被邀请参加了研究的定量方面。有效率为86.2% (n = 159)。结果:本研究纳入136名初级保健医生;结论:组织迫切需要设计自己的生物伦理准则和规则,以确保卫生保健专业人员安全使用SM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bridging the gap: Engagement of family and community physicians in digital networks for health issues.

Bridging the gap: Engagement of family and community physicians in digital networks for health issues.

Background: The use of social media (SM) is unlocking infinite opportunities for healthcare disciplines and is fast becoming the preferred medium of communication. This underlines the importance of meeting the challenges of this new era. The aim of this study was to assess the readiness of Saudi family medicine physicians to the use of SM in health promotion and to explore their prospective attitudes toward its use professionally.

Materials and methods: The two largest hospital-based primary care centers in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia were used for the quantitative analysis. All known physician bloggers in Saudi Arabia from seven different cities were invited to participate in the qualitative aspect of this study. The quantitative component of this study was conducted in the Eastern Province at two main hospitals. A 37-item questionnaire was distributed to all family physicians practising at these hospitals. The qualitative component of this study covered all of Saudi Arabia, and 11 in-depth interviews were held with family physician bloggers, followed by verbatim transcription, content analysis, and coding of the results. Chi-squared and independent t-tests were used. All physicians at the two largest hospitals in the Eastern Province were invited to participate in the quantitative aspect of the study. The response rate was 86.2% (n = 159).

Results: Study included 136 primary care physicians; majority were <50 years old (96.3%) with 58.8% females. About 60% were residents and 27.2 % consultants, and 76.5% were were family medicine physicians. Ninety-six percent physicians had SM accounts, the mean use of 3 h per day, 46.3% of the family physicians had good knowledge of SM ethics, and 69.9% used SM professionally for medical issues. Most of the responses showed a strong positive attitude; more than 60% of the participants responded as "agree" or "strongly agree" to the positive statements.

Conclusion: Organizations urgently need to design their own bioethical guidelines and rules on the safe use of SM by healthcare professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Community Medicine
Journal of Family and Community Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信