防晒的预防价值。

Current problems in dermatology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-25 DOI:10.1159/000517641
Henriette Rönsch, Andrea Bauer
{"title":"防晒的预防价值。","authors":"Henriette Rönsch,&nbsp;Andrea Bauer","doi":"10.1159/000517641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With more than 200,000 new cases per year, skin tumours have been the most frequently reported cancers in Germany for years. We performed a systematic review to summarise the current evidence concerning the preventive value of regular sunscreen use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic literature review of controlled and randomised controlled trials were performed in Ovid Embase and Ovid Medline on 21 January 2020. We included studies evaluating the effectiveness of sunscreens on epithelial skin cancer, actinic keratosis or photoageing, or side effects in humans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five eligible trials, each involving 28 to 1,621 participants from various populations, were identified. All 4 studies on actinic keratoses showed a significant beneficial effect of sunscreens. The 2 studies on squamous cell carcinoma demonstrated significant beneficial effects of sunscreens. The 2 studies on photoageing observed a significant reduction in the sunscreen groups. The 2 studies on basal cell carcinoma reported no significant results, but both studies reported some non-significant protective effects of sunscreen use. Sunscreens as well as vehicles sometimes had side effects affecting skin and eyes. Compared with controls, sunscreens had no significant side effects on vitamin D, bone mass density and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence from published controlled and randomised controlled studies is limited. Especially for basal cell carcinoma, further high-quality studies including young populations are required to investigate possible protective effects of modern broad-spectrum sunscreens. The results of this systematic review do not change the current recommendations for UV protection. Sunscreens are recommended as a second-line measure against solar radiation whenever protective clothing and seeking shake are inadequate.</p>","PeriodicalId":11010,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in dermatology","volume":"55 ","pages":"316-328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Preventive Value of Sun Protection.\",\"authors\":\"Henriette Rönsch,&nbsp;Andrea Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000517641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With more than 200,000 new cases per year, skin tumours have been the most frequently reported cancers in Germany for years. We performed a systematic review to summarise the current evidence concerning the preventive value of regular sunscreen use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic literature review of controlled and randomised controlled trials were performed in Ovid Embase and Ovid Medline on 21 January 2020. We included studies evaluating the effectiveness of sunscreens on epithelial skin cancer, actinic keratosis or photoageing, or side effects in humans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five eligible trials, each involving 28 to 1,621 participants from various populations, were identified. All 4 studies on actinic keratoses showed a significant beneficial effect of sunscreens. The 2 studies on squamous cell carcinoma demonstrated significant beneficial effects of sunscreens. The 2 studies on photoageing observed a significant reduction in the sunscreen groups. The 2 studies on basal cell carcinoma reported no significant results, but both studies reported some non-significant protective effects of sunscreen use. Sunscreens as well as vehicles sometimes had side effects affecting skin and eyes. Compared with controls, sunscreens had no significant side effects on vitamin D, bone mass density and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence from published controlled and randomised controlled studies is limited. Especially for basal cell carcinoma, further high-quality studies including young populations are required to investigate possible protective effects of modern broad-spectrum sunscreens. The results of this systematic review do not change the current recommendations for UV protection. Sunscreens are recommended as a second-line measure against solar radiation whenever protective clothing and seeking shake are inadequate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current problems in dermatology\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"316-328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current problems in dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000517641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000517641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:多年来,每年有超过20万的新病例,皮肤肿瘤是德国最常见的癌症。我们进行了一项系统综述,总结了目前关于经常使用防晒霜的预防价值的证据。方法:于2020年1月21日在Ovid Embase和Ovid Medline中进行对照和随机对照试验的系统文献综述。我们纳入了评估防晒霜对上皮性皮肤癌、光化性角化病或光老化或人类副作用的有效性的研究。结果:确定了5个符合条件的试验,每个试验涉及28至1,621名来自不同人群的参与者。所有4项关于光化性角化病的研究都显示了防晒霜的显著有益效果。两项针对鳞状细胞癌的研究表明,防晒霜有显著的有益效果。两项关于光老化的研究发现,防晒霜组的光老化显著减少。这两项关于基底细胞癌的研究没有报告显著的结果,但两项研究都报告了使用防晒霜的一些不显著的保护作用。防晒霜和车辆有时会对皮肤和眼睛产生副作用。与对照组相比,防晒霜对维生素D、骨密度和死亡率没有明显的副作用。结论:已发表的对照和随机对照研究的证据是有限的。特别是对于基底细胞癌,需要进一步的高质量研究,包括年轻人群,以调查现代广谱防晒霜可能的保护作用。该系统综述的结果不会改变目前对紫外线防护的建议。当防护服和遮阳衣不够时,建议使用防晒霜作为防止太阳辐射的第二线措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Preventive Value of Sun Protection.

Background: With more than 200,000 new cases per year, skin tumours have been the most frequently reported cancers in Germany for years. We performed a systematic review to summarise the current evidence concerning the preventive value of regular sunscreen use.

Methods: Systematic literature review of controlled and randomised controlled trials were performed in Ovid Embase and Ovid Medline on 21 January 2020. We included studies evaluating the effectiveness of sunscreens on epithelial skin cancer, actinic keratosis or photoageing, or side effects in humans.

Results: Five eligible trials, each involving 28 to 1,621 participants from various populations, were identified. All 4 studies on actinic keratoses showed a significant beneficial effect of sunscreens. The 2 studies on squamous cell carcinoma demonstrated significant beneficial effects of sunscreens. The 2 studies on photoageing observed a significant reduction in the sunscreen groups. The 2 studies on basal cell carcinoma reported no significant results, but both studies reported some non-significant protective effects of sunscreen use. Sunscreens as well as vehicles sometimes had side effects affecting skin and eyes. Compared with controls, sunscreens had no significant side effects on vitamin D, bone mass density and mortality.

Conclusion: The evidence from published controlled and randomised controlled studies is limited. Especially for basal cell carcinoma, further high-quality studies including young populations are required to investigate possible protective effects of modern broad-spectrum sunscreens. The results of this systematic review do not change the current recommendations for UV protection. Sunscreens are recommended as a second-line measure against solar radiation whenever protective clothing and seeking shake are inadequate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信