Jiafeng Zhang, Chaoxiong Ye, Hong-Jin Sun, Jing Zhou, Tengfei Liang, Yuchen Li, Qiang Liu
{"title":"被动状态:工作记忆任务中信息的保护机制。","authors":"Jiafeng Zhang, Chaoxiong Ye, Hong-Jin Sun, Jing Zhou, Tengfei Liang, Yuchen Li, Qiang Liu","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Memory representations can be stored in a passive state in a visual working memory (VWM) task. However, it remains unclear whether the representations stored in the passive state are prone to interference and decay. To explore this issue, we asked participants to successively remember two sets of memory items (M1 and M2) in three test manners: a <i>combined test</i> (both M1 and M2 are probed simultaneously), a <i>backward test</i> (probe M2 first and M1 second), or a <i>forward test</i> (probe M1 first and M2 second). We found that the contralateral delay activity (CDA) amplitude after the onset of M2 only tracked M2 independently of M1 in the two <i>separate tests</i> (Experiments 1-3), and the accuracy of M1 was well above chance. These results implied that the M1 representations had been transferred from the online state into the passive state after the onset of M2. Furthermore, the accuracy of M1 (two representations were transferred from the online state into the passive state and retrieved later) in the <i>backward test</i> was worse than M2 (2 representations in the online state throughout) in the <i>backward test</i> (Experiments 1-2), but was comparable to M1 (two representations were transferred from the online state into the passive state and retrieved first) in the <i>forward test</i> (Experiment 2). These results demonstrated that the memory representations were impaired during state switching. Importantly, once the representations had been stored in the passive state, they were robust with little memory loss during latent retention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":504300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1235-1248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The passive state: A protective mechanism for information in working memory tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Jiafeng Zhang, Chaoxiong Ye, Hong-Jin Sun, Jing Zhou, Tengfei Liang, Yuchen Li, Qiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Memory representations can be stored in a passive state in a visual working memory (VWM) task. However, it remains unclear whether the representations stored in the passive state are prone to interference and decay. To explore this issue, we asked participants to successively remember two sets of memory items (M1 and M2) in three test manners: a <i>combined test</i> (both M1 and M2 are probed simultaneously), a <i>backward test</i> (probe M2 first and M1 second), or a <i>forward test</i> (probe M1 first and M2 second). We found that the contralateral delay activity (CDA) amplitude after the onset of M2 only tracked M2 independently of M1 in the two <i>separate tests</i> (Experiments 1-3), and the accuracy of M1 was well above chance. These results implied that the M1 representations had been transferred from the online state into the passive state after the onset of M2. Furthermore, the accuracy of M1 (two representations were transferred from the online state into the passive state and retrieved later) in the <i>backward test</i> was worse than M2 (2 representations in the online state throughout) in the <i>backward test</i> (Experiments 1-2), but was comparable to M1 (two representations were transferred from the online state into the passive state and retrieved first) in the <i>forward test</i> (Experiment 2). These results demonstrated that the memory representations were impaired during state switching. Importantly, once the representations had been stored in the passive state, they were robust with little memory loss during latent retention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":504300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1235-1248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
记忆表征可以在视觉工作记忆(VWM)任务中以被动状态存储。然而,目前尚不清楚存储在被动状态下的表征是否容易受到干扰和衰减。为了探讨这一问题,我们要求参与者以三种测试方式连续记忆两组记忆项目(M1和M2):组合测试(同时探测M1和M2),向后测试(先探测M2,再探测M1),或向前测试(先探测M1,再探测M2)。我们发现,在两个单独的测试(实验1-3)中,M2发作后的对侧延迟活动(CDA)振幅仅独立于M1跟踪M2, M1的准确性远远高于偶然。这些结果表明,在M2开始后,M1表征已经从在线状态转移到被动状态。此外,在后向测试中,M1(2个表征从在线状态转移到被动状态后再被检索)的准确性低于M2(2个表征始终处于在线状态)(实验1-2)。但在正向测试(实验2)中,与M1(两个表征从在线状态转移到被动状态并首先恢复)相当。这些结果表明,在状态切换过程中,记忆表征受到损害。重要的是,一旦表征被存储在被动状态下,它们在潜在保留期间几乎没有记忆损失。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
The passive state: A protective mechanism for information in working memory tasks.
Memory representations can be stored in a passive state in a visual working memory (VWM) task. However, it remains unclear whether the representations stored in the passive state are prone to interference and decay. To explore this issue, we asked participants to successively remember two sets of memory items (M1 and M2) in three test manners: a combined test (both M1 and M2 are probed simultaneously), a backward test (probe M2 first and M1 second), or a forward test (probe M1 first and M2 second). We found that the contralateral delay activity (CDA) amplitude after the onset of M2 only tracked M2 independently of M1 in the two separate tests (Experiments 1-3), and the accuracy of M1 was well above chance. These results implied that the M1 representations had been transferred from the online state into the passive state after the onset of M2. Furthermore, the accuracy of M1 (two representations were transferred from the online state into the passive state and retrieved later) in the backward test was worse than M2 (2 representations in the online state throughout) in the backward test (Experiments 1-2), but was comparable to M1 (two representations were transferred from the online state into the passive state and retrieved first) in the forward test (Experiment 2). These results demonstrated that the memory representations were impaired during state switching. Importantly, once the representations had been stored in the passive state, they were robust with little memory loss during latent retention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).