新冠疫情爆发、政策应对和反弹:股权众筹和P2P与银行。

IF 4.6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of Technology Transfer Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-16 DOI:10.1007/s10961-021-09899-6
Douglas J Cumming, Andrea Martinez-Salgueiro, Robert S Reardon, Ahmed Sewaid
{"title":"新冠疫情爆发、政策应对和反弹:股权众筹和P2P与银行。","authors":"Douglas J Cumming,&nbsp;Andrea Martinez-Salgueiro,&nbsp;Robert S Reardon,&nbsp;Ahmed Sewaid","doi":"10.1007/s10961-021-09899-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional intermediaries have the ability and the incentive to intertemporarily smooth outcomes. Fintechs, such as peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms and equity crowdfunding (ECF) platforms, enable riskier projects without regard to intertemporal smoothing. U.S. data from May 2016 to June 2020 show that COVID-19 had an adverse impact on bank consumer lending. However, counter to our expectations, ECF and P2P are much more stable, timely, and resilient in the COVID-19 crisis compared to bank consumer lending. Moreover, the data indicate that P2P lending is a leading indicator for bank consumer lending and that bank consumer lending substitutes ECF. The policy response-CARES Act-caused: (1) a significant increase in ECF volumes, (2) a substantial rebound to bank consumer lending, and iii) at best, neutralized an already-stabilized level of P2P lending.</p>","PeriodicalId":48228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Transfer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520110/pdf/","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 bust, policy response, and rebound: equity crowdfunding and P2P versus banks.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas J Cumming,&nbsp;Andrea Martinez-Salgueiro,&nbsp;Robert S Reardon,&nbsp;Ahmed Sewaid\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10961-021-09899-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traditional intermediaries have the ability and the incentive to intertemporarily smooth outcomes. Fintechs, such as peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms and equity crowdfunding (ECF) platforms, enable riskier projects without regard to intertemporal smoothing. U.S. data from May 2016 to June 2020 show that COVID-19 had an adverse impact on bank consumer lending. However, counter to our expectations, ECF and P2P are much more stable, timely, and resilient in the COVID-19 crisis compared to bank consumer lending. Moreover, the data indicate that P2P lending is a leading indicator for bank consumer lending and that bank consumer lending substitutes ECF. The policy response-CARES Act-caused: (1) a significant increase in ECF volumes, (2) a substantial rebound to bank consumer lending, and iii) at best, neutralized an already-stabilized level of P2P lending.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Technology Transfer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520110/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Technology Transfer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09899-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09899-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

传统的中介机构有能力也有动力去实现暂时的平稳结果。金融科技,如点对点(P2P)借贷平台和股权众筹(ECF)平台,可以在不考虑跨期平滑的情况下实现风险更高的项目。美国2016年5月至2020年6月的数据显示,COVID-19对银行消费贷款产生了不利影响。然而,与我们的预期相反,与银行消费贷款相比,ECF和P2P在2019冠状病毒病危机中更加稳定、及时和有弹性。此外,数据表明,P2P借贷是银行消费借贷的领先指标,银行消费借贷替代了ECF。政策回应——《关怀法案》——导致:(1)ECF数量显著增加,(2)银行消费贷款大幅反弹,以及(3)至多抵消了已经稳定的P2P贷款水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

COVID-19 bust, policy response, and rebound: equity crowdfunding and P2P versus banks.

COVID-19 bust, policy response, and rebound: equity crowdfunding and P2P versus banks.

Traditional intermediaries have the ability and the incentive to intertemporarily smooth outcomes. Fintechs, such as peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms and equity crowdfunding (ECF) platforms, enable riskier projects without regard to intertemporal smoothing. U.S. data from May 2016 to June 2020 show that COVID-19 had an adverse impact on bank consumer lending. However, counter to our expectations, ECF and P2P are much more stable, timely, and resilient in the COVID-19 crisis compared to bank consumer lending. Moreover, the data indicate that P2P lending is a leading indicator for bank consumer lending and that bank consumer lending substitutes ECF. The policy response-CARES Act-caused: (1) a significant increase in ECF volumes, (2) a substantial rebound to bank consumer lending, and iii) at best, neutralized an already-stabilized level of P2P lending.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Transfer provides an international forum for research on the economic, managerial and policy implication of technology transfer, entrepreneurship, and innovation. The Journal is especially interested in articles that focus on the relationship between the external environment and organizations (governments, public agencies, firms, universities) and their innovation process. The Journal welcomes alternative modes of presentation ranging from broad empirical analyses, to theoretical models, to case studies based on theoretical foundations.  Officially cited as: J Technol Transf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信