南非布隆方丹大学学术医院医生放射学研究的成本意识。

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2021-09-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2188
Khanyisa N Mrwetyana, Jacques Janse van Rensburg, Gina Joubert
{"title":"南非布隆方丹大学学术医院医生放射学研究的成本意识。","authors":"Khanyisa N Mrwetyana,&nbsp;Jacques Janse van Rensburg,&nbsp;Gina Joubert","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa has high healthcare expenses. Improving cost-consciousness could decrease government expenditure on healthcare.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine cost awareness of radiological studies among doctors at a tertiary hospital. The objective was met by assessing the accuracy of cost estimation according to the level of training and speciality, whether participants had received prior education/training related to cost awareness and if they had a desire to learn more about the cost of radiological imaging.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six clinical departments at Universitas Academic Hospital using an anonymous questionnaire that determined doctors' cost awareness of five radiological studies. Each radiological study was answered using six different cost ranges, with one correct option. Costs were based on the Department of Health's 2019 Uniform Patients Fee Schedule (UPFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 131 (67.2%) of 195 questionnaires distributed to registrars and consultants were returned. Overall, low accuracy of cost estimation was observed, with 45.2% of the participants choosing only incorrect options. No participant estimated all five costs correctly. Only the Internal Medicine clinicians demonstrated a significant difference between registrars and consultants for the number of correct answers (median 0 and 1, respectively) (<i>p</i> = 0.04). No significant differences were found between specialities stratified by registrars/consultants. Most participants (88.6%) would like to learn about imaging costs. Only 2.3% of the participants had received prior education/training related to cost awareness of radiological studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Doctors were consistently inaccurate in estimating the cost of radiological studies. Educating doctors about the cost of radiological imaging could have a positive effect on healthcare expenditure.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost awareness of radiological studies among doctors at Universitas Academic Hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Khanyisa N Mrwetyana,&nbsp;Jacques Janse van Rensburg,&nbsp;Gina Joubert\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa has high healthcare expenses. Improving cost-consciousness could decrease government expenditure on healthcare.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine cost awareness of radiological studies among doctors at a tertiary hospital. The objective was met by assessing the accuracy of cost estimation according to the level of training and speciality, whether participants had received prior education/training related to cost awareness and if they had a desire to learn more about the cost of radiological imaging.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six clinical departments at Universitas Academic Hospital using an anonymous questionnaire that determined doctors' cost awareness of five radiological studies. Each radiological study was answered using six different cost ranges, with one correct option. Costs were based on the Department of Health's 2019 Uniform Patients Fee Schedule (UPFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 131 (67.2%) of 195 questionnaires distributed to registrars and consultants were returned. Overall, low accuracy of cost estimation was observed, with 45.2% of the participants choosing only incorrect options. No participant estimated all five costs correctly. Only the Internal Medicine clinicians demonstrated a significant difference between registrars and consultants for the number of correct answers (median 0 and 1, respectively) (<i>p</i> = 0.04). No significant differences were found between specialities stratified by registrars/consultants. Most participants (88.6%) would like to learn about imaging costs. Only 2.3% of the participants had received prior education/training related to cost awareness of radiological studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Doctors were consistently inaccurate in estimating the cost of radiological studies. Educating doctors about the cost of radiological imaging could have a positive effect on healthcare expenditure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SA Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517821/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SA Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v25i1.2188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:南非的医疗费用很高。提高成本意识可以减少政府在医疗保健方面的支出。目的:了解某三级医院医生放射学研究的成本意识。根据培训水平和专业,评估成本估算的准确性,参与者是否接受过与成本意识有关的教育/培训,以及他们是否希望更多地了解放射成像的成本,从而达到了目标。方法:在Universitas学术医院的六个临床科室进行横断面调查,采用匿名调查问卷确定医生对五项放射学研究的成本意识。每项放射学研究都用六个不同的费用范围来回答,只有一个正确的选择。费用是根据卫生部2019年统一患者收费表(UPFS)计算的。结果:发放给登记员和咨询人员的195份问卷中,共回收131份(67.2%)。总体而言,成本估计的准确性较低,45.2%的参与者只选择了错误的选项。没有参与者正确估计了所有五项成本。只有内科临床医生在登记员和咨询师的正确答案数量上表现出显著差异(中位数分别为0和1)(p = 0.04)。按注册商/顾问划分的专业之间没有发现显著差异。大多数参与者(88.6%)希望了解影像学费用。只有2.3%的参与者曾接受过有关放射学研究成本意识的教育/培训。结论:医生对放射学研究费用的估计一贯不准确。让医生了解放射成像的成本可能对医疗支出产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cost awareness of radiological studies among doctors at Universitas Academic Hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Cost awareness of radiological studies among doctors at Universitas Academic Hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Background: South Africa has high healthcare expenses. Improving cost-consciousness could decrease government expenditure on healthcare.

Objectives: To determine cost awareness of radiological studies among doctors at a tertiary hospital. The objective was met by assessing the accuracy of cost estimation according to the level of training and speciality, whether participants had received prior education/training related to cost awareness and if they had a desire to learn more about the cost of radiological imaging.

Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six clinical departments at Universitas Academic Hospital using an anonymous questionnaire that determined doctors' cost awareness of five radiological studies. Each radiological study was answered using six different cost ranges, with one correct option. Costs were based on the Department of Health's 2019 Uniform Patients Fee Schedule (UPFS).

Results: In total, 131 (67.2%) of 195 questionnaires distributed to registrars and consultants were returned. Overall, low accuracy of cost estimation was observed, with 45.2% of the participants choosing only incorrect options. No participant estimated all five costs correctly. Only the Internal Medicine clinicians demonstrated a significant difference between registrars and consultants for the number of correct answers (median 0 and 1, respectively) (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between specialities stratified by registrars/consultants. Most participants (88.6%) would like to learn about imaging costs. Only 2.3% of the participants had received prior education/training related to cost awareness of radiological studies.

Conclusion: Doctors were consistently inaccurate in estimating the cost of radiological studies. Educating doctors about the cost of radiological imaging could have a positive effect on healthcare expenditure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信