大麻二酚(CBD)油在体外降低癌细胞活力方面没有显示随行效应。

Q1 Medicine
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Pub Date : 2020-09-17 eCollection Date: 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1159/000510256
Wesley M Raup-Konsavage, Nurgul Carkaci-Salli, Kelly Greenland, Robert Gearhart, Kent E Vrana
{"title":"大麻二酚(CBD)油在体外降低癌细胞活力方面没有显示随行效应。","authors":"Wesley M Raup-Konsavage,&nbsp;Nurgul Carkaci-Salli,&nbsp;Kelly Greenland,&nbsp;Robert Gearhart,&nbsp;Kent E Vrana","doi":"10.1159/000510256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several studies have found that cannabinoids, particularly delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol (CBD), have the ability to reduce cancer cell viability. An ongoing debate regarding the use of medical Cannabis revolves around the effectiveness of pure compounds versus intact plant material for treatment. Proponents for the use of intact plant material or botanical extracts argue that there is a synergistic effect between the different cannabinoids, terpenoids, and flavonoids; this is commonly referred to as the \"entourage effect.\" Our study was designed to test the validity of the proposed entourage effect in a narrow application using a cancer cell viability model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six cancer cell lines, from 3 different types of human cancer were treated with 10 μM pure CBD or 10 μM CBD from hemp (<i>Cannabis sativa</i>) oil (obtained from 3 different commercial sources) for 48 h, and cell viability was measured with the MTS assay. Dose-response curves were then performed to compare the potencies of pure CBD to CBD oils. CBD concentrations were independently confirmed in the commercial oils, and cannabinoid and terpene composition were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CBD (10 μM) was able to reduce cell viability in 3 of the 6 cell lines tested, and this was found to be cell line specific and not specific to select cancers. None of the CBD oils tested were able to reduce viability to a greater extent than that of pure CBD. Additionally, dose-response curves found lower IC<sub>50</sub> values for pure CBD compared to the most potent CBD oil tested. Interestingly, some oils actually appeared to protect cancer cells from the effects of CBD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that pure CBD was as potent or more potent at reducing cancer cell viability as the most potent oil tested, suggesting that there is no \"entourage\" effect under these specific in vitro conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18415,"journal":{"name":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","volume":"3 2","pages":"95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000510256","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabidiol (CBD) Oil Does Not Display an Entourage Effect in Reducing Cancer Cell Viability in vitro.\",\"authors\":\"Wesley M Raup-Konsavage,&nbsp;Nurgul Carkaci-Salli,&nbsp;Kelly Greenland,&nbsp;Robert Gearhart,&nbsp;Kent E Vrana\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000510256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several studies have found that cannabinoids, particularly delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol (CBD), have the ability to reduce cancer cell viability. An ongoing debate regarding the use of medical Cannabis revolves around the effectiveness of pure compounds versus intact plant material for treatment. Proponents for the use of intact plant material or botanical extracts argue that there is a synergistic effect between the different cannabinoids, terpenoids, and flavonoids; this is commonly referred to as the \\\"entourage effect.\\\" Our study was designed to test the validity of the proposed entourage effect in a narrow application using a cancer cell viability model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six cancer cell lines, from 3 different types of human cancer were treated with 10 μM pure CBD or 10 μM CBD from hemp (<i>Cannabis sativa</i>) oil (obtained from 3 different commercial sources) for 48 h, and cell viability was measured with the MTS assay. Dose-response curves were then performed to compare the potencies of pure CBD to CBD oils. CBD concentrations were independently confirmed in the commercial oils, and cannabinoid and terpene composition were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CBD (10 μM) was able to reduce cell viability in 3 of the 6 cell lines tested, and this was found to be cell line specific and not specific to select cancers. None of the CBD oils tested were able to reduce viability to a greater extent than that of pure CBD. Additionally, dose-response curves found lower IC<sub>50</sub> values for pure CBD compared to the most potent CBD oil tested. Interestingly, some oils actually appeared to protect cancer cells from the effects of CBD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that pure CBD was as potent or more potent at reducing cancer cell viability as the most potent oil tested, suggesting that there is no \\\"entourage\\\" effect under these specific in vitro conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"95-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000510256\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000510256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000510256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

几项研究发现,大麻素,特别是德尔塔-9-四氢大麻酚和大麻二酚(CBD),具有降低癌细胞活力的能力。关于医用大麻使用的持续辩论围绕纯化合物与完整植物材料治疗的有效性展开。支持使用完整植物材料或植物提取物的人认为,不同的大麻素、萜类和类黄酮之间存在协同效应;这通常被称为“随从效应”。我们的研究旨在使用癌细胞活力模型在一个狭窄的应用中测试所提出的随行效应的有效性。材料和方法:用10 μM纯CBD或10 μM大麻油(3种不同的商业来源)处理6株3种不同类型人类癌症的癌细胞48 h,用MTS法测定细胞活力。然后进行剂量-反应曲线来比较纯CBD和CBD油的效力。在商业油中独立确认了CBD浓度,并比较了大麻素和萜烯的组成。结果:CBD (10 μM)能够降低6个细胞系中的3个细胞系的细胞活力,并且发现这是细胞系特异性的,而不是特异性的选择癌症。测试的CBD油中没有一种能够比纯CBD油更大程度地降低活力。此外,剂量-反应曲线发现,与测试的最有效的CBD油相比,纯CBD的IC50值更低。有趣的是,一些油实际上似乎可以保护癌细胞免受CBD的影响。结论:我们发现纯CBD在降低癌细胞活力方面与最有效的油一样有效,甚至更有效,这表明在这些特定的体外条件下没有“随从”效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cannabidiol (CBD) Oil Does Not Display an Entourage Effect in Reducing Cancer Cell Viability in vitro.

Introduction: Several studies have found that cannabinoids, particularly delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol (CBD), have the ability to reduce cancer cell viability. An ongoing debate regarding the use of medical Cannabis revolves around the effectiveness of pure compounds versus intact plant material for treatment. Proponents for the use of intact plant material or botanical extracts argue that there is a synergistic effect between the different cannabinoids, terpenoids, and flavonoids; this is commonly referred to as the "entourage effect." Our study was designed to test the validity of the proposed entourage effect in a narrow application using a cancer cell viability model.

Materials and methods: Six cancer cell lines, from 3 different types of human cancer were treated with 10 μM pure CBD or 10 μM CBD from hemp (Cannabis sativa) oil (obtained from 3 different commercial sources) for 48 h, and cell viability was measured with the MTS assay. Dose-response curves were then performed to compare the potencies of pure CBD to CBD oils. CBD concentrations were independently confirmed in the commercial oils, and cannabinoid and terpene composition were also compared.

Results: CBD (10 μM) was able to reduce cell viability in 3 of the 6 cell lines tested, and this was found to be cell line specific and not specific to select cancers. None of the CBD oils tested were able to reduce viability to a greater extent than that of pure CBD. Additionally, dose-response curves found lower IC50 values for pure CBD compared to the most potent CBD oil tested. Interestingly, some oils actually appeared to protect cancer cells from the effects of CBD.

Conclusions: We found that pure CBD was as potent or more potent at reducing cancer cell viability as the most potent oil tested, suggesting that there is no "entourage" effect under these specific in vitro conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信