外周输注去甲肾上腺素以避免重症监护病房中心静脉导管放置:一项试点研究。

The Annals of pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-21 DOI:10.1177/10600280211053318
Lara M Groetzinger, Julia Williams, Susan Svec, Michael P Donahoe, Phillip E Lamberty, Ian J Barbash
{"title":"外周输注去甲肾上腺素以避免重症监护病房中心静脉导管放置:一项试点研究。","authors":"Lara M Groetzinger,&nbsp;Julia Williams,&nbsp;Susan Svec,&nbsp;Michael P Donahoe,&nbsp;Phillip E Lamberty,&nbsp;Ian J Barbash","doi":"10.1177/10600280211053318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing central venous catheter (CVC) utilization can reduce complications in the intensive care unit (ICU). While norepinephrine (NE) is traditionally administered via a CVC, lower concentrations may be safely administered via peripheral intravenous (PIV) lines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to describe the implementation of a pilot protocol utilizing PIVs to administer a low-dose and lower-concentration NE, review the number of CVCs avoided, and evaluate any adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a quaternary medical intensive care unit (MICU), from March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020, we reviewed charts for CVC placement and adverse events from the pNE infusion. We also measured unit-level CVC utilization in all MICU patients and assessed the change in utilization associated with the peripheral norepinephrine (pNE) protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 1-year period, 87 patients received a pNE infusion. Overall, 44 patients (51%) never required CVC placement during their MICU stay. Three patients (3%) experienced adverse events, none of which were documented as serious and or required antidote for treatment. Implementation of the protocol was associated with a decrease in the number of patients at the unit level who received CVCs, even if they did not receive pNE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>In this small pilot study, we pragmatically demonstrated that pNE is safe and may reduce the need for CVC placement. This information can be used to aid in pNE protocol development and implementation at other institutions, but further research should be done to confirm the safety of routine use of pNE in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":512049,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"773-781"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peripherally Infused Norepinephrine to Avoid Central Venous Catheter Placement in a Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lara M Groetzinger,&nbsp;Julia Williams,&nbsp;Susan Svec,&nbsp;Michael P Donahoe,&nbsp;Phillip E Lamberty,&nbsp;Ian J Barbash\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280211053318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing central venous catheter (CVC) utilization can reduce complications in the intensive care unit (ICU). While norepinephrine (NE) is traditionally administered via a CVC, lower concentrations may be safely administered via peripheral intravenous (PIV) lines.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to describe the implementation of a pilot protocol utilizing PIVs to administer a low-dose and lower-concentration NE, review the number of CVCs avoided, and evaluate any adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a quaternary medical intensive care unit (MICU), from March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020, we reviewed charts for CVC placement and adverse events from the pNE infusion. We also measured unit-level CVC utilization in all MICU patients and assessed the change in utilization associated with the peripheral norepinephrine (pNE) protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 1-year period, 87 patients received a pNE infusion. Overall, 44 patients (51%) never required CVC placement during their MICU stay. Three patients (3%) experienced adverse events, none of which were documented as serious and or required antidote for treatment. Implementation of the protocol was associated with a decrease in the number of patients at the unit level who received CVCs, even if they did not receive pNE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>In this small pilot study, we pragmatically demonstrated that pNE is safe and may reduce the need for CVC placement. This information can be used to aid in pNE protocol development and implementation at other institutions, but further research should be done to confirm the safety of routine use of pNE in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":512049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Annals of pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"773-781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Annals of pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280211053318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280211053318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:减少中心静脉导管(CVC)的使用可以减少重症监护病房(ICU)的并发症。虽然去甲肾上腺素(NE)传统上是通过CVC给药,但低浓度的去甲肾上腺素可以通过外周静脉注射(PIV)线安全给药。目的:我们旨在描述利用piv给药低剂量低浓度NE的试点方案的实施情况,回顾避免的cvc数量,并评估任何不良事件。方法:2019年3月1日至2020年2月29日,在一家第四医学重症监护病房(MICU),我们回顾了CVC放置和pNE输注不良事件的图表。我们还测量了所有MICU患者单位水平的CVC利用率,并评估了与外周去甲肾上腺素(pNE)方案相关的利用率变化。结果:在1年的时间里,87例患者接受了pNE输注。总体而言,44名患者(51%)在MICU住院期间从未需要放置CVC。3名患者(3%)出现不良事件,没有记录为严重或需要解毒剂治疗。该方案的实施与单位水平接受cvc的患者数量的减少有关,即使他们没有接受pNE。结论和相关性:在这个小型的试点研究中,我们实际地证明了pNE是安全的,并且可能减少CVC放置的需要。这些信息可用于帮助其他机构制定和实施pNE方案,但还需进一步研究以确认临床实践中常规使用pNE的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peripherally Infused Norepinephrine to Avoid Central Venous Catheter Placement in a Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study.

Background: Reducing central venous catheter (CVC) utilization can reduce complications in the intensive care unit (ICU). While norepinephrine (NE) is traditionally administered via a CVC, lower concentrations may be safely administered via peripheral intravenous (PIV) lines.

Objective: We aimed to describe the implementation of a pilot protocol utilizing PIVs to administer a low-dose and lower-concentration NE, review the number of CVCs avoided, and evaluate any adverse events.

Methods: In a quaternary medical intensive care unit (MICU), from March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020, we reviewed charts for CVC placement and adverse events from the pNE infusion. We also measured unit-level CVC utilization in all MICU patients and assessed the change in utilization associated with the peripheral norepinephrine (pNE) protocol.

Results: Over a 1-year period, 87 patients received a pNE infusion. Overall, 44 patients (51%) never required CVC placement during their MICU stay. Three patients (3%) experienced adverse events, none of which were documented as serious and or required antidote for treatment. Implementation of the protocol was associated with a decrease in the number of patients at the unit level who received CVCs, even if they did not receive pNE.

Conclusion and relevance: In this small pilot study, we pragmatically demonstrated that pNE is safe and may reduce the need for CVC placement. This information can be used to aid in pNE protocol development and implementation at other institutions, but further research should be done to confirm the safety of routine use of pNE in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信