远程医疗和办公室护理的实践费用成本差异可以作为差异报销结构的基础。

Elizabeth O Aremu, James L Heffernan, Joseph C Kvedar
{"title":"远程医疗和办公室护理的实践费用成本差异可以作为差异报销结构的基础。","authors":"Elizabeth O Aremu,&nbsp;James L Heffernan,&nbsp;Joseph C Kvedar","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\n <b>\n <i>Background:</i>\n </b>\n <i>There has been much recent discussion about the reimbursement of telehealth virtual visits. Advocates argue strongly for payment parity with in-person encounters, whereas payers insist that telehealth visits should be reimbursed at a lower value.</i>\n <b>\n <i>Methods:</i>\n </b>\n <i>Using the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale structure as a guideline (where physician compensation is divided into categories: time/medical decision making/malpractice expense and practice expense), we developed a framework to examine the difference in practice expense of an in-person practice compared with a scaled virtual practice.</i>\n <b>\n <i>Results:</i>\n </b>\n <i>We found that for current procedural terminology (CPT) code 99213, the total relative value unit (RVU) for a virtual visit would be 1.62. The in-office RVU for CPT code 99213 is 2.09.</i>\n <i>This difference could serve as the basis for a rational discussion on differential reimbursement for virtual visits.</i>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"912-916"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Difference in Practice Expense Costs Between Telehealth and In-Office Care Could Serve as the Basis for Differential Reimbursement Structures.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth O Aremu,&nbsp;James L Heffernan,&nbsp;Joseph C Kvedar\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2021.0229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>\\n <b>\\n <i>Background:</i>\\n </b>\\n <i>There has been much recent discussion about the reimbursement of telehealth virtual visits. Advocates argue strongly for payment parity with in-person encounters, whereas payers insist that telehealth visits should be reimbursed at a lower value.</i>\\n <b>\\n <i>Methods:</i>\\n </b>\\n <i>Using the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale structure as a guideline (where physician compensation is divided into categories: time/medical decision making/malpractice expense and practice expense), we developed a framework to examine the difference in practice expense of an in-person practice compared with a scaled virtual practice.</i>\\n <b>\\n <i>Results:</i>\\n </b>\\n <i>We found that for current procedural terminology (CPT) code 99213, the total relative value unit (RVU) for a virtual visit would be 1.62. The in-office RVU for CPT code 99213 is 2.09.</i>\\n <i>This difference could serve as the basis for a rational discussion on differential reimbursement for virtual visits.</i>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"912-916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:最近有很多关于远程医疗虚拟就诊报销的讨论。提倡者强烈主张支付与面对面接触同等的费用,而支付者坚持认为远程医疗访问应该以较低的价格报销。方法:使用基于资源的相对价值量表结构作为指导(其中医生补偿分为:时间/医疗决策/医疗事故费用和实践费用),我们开发了一个框架来检查现场实践与缩放虚拟实践的实践费用差异。结果:我们发现对于当前程序术语(CPT)代码99213,虚拟访问的总相对价值单位(RVU)将为1.62。CPT编码99213的局内RVU为2.09。这一差异可作为合理讨论虚拟就诊差别化报销问题的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Difference in Practice Expense Costs Between Telehealth and In-Office Care Could Serve as the Basis for Differential Reimbursement Structures.

Background: There has been much recent discussion about the reimbursement of telehealth virtual visits. Advocates argue strongly for payment parity with in-person encounters, whereas payers insist that telehealth visits should be reimbursed at a lower value. Methods: Using the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale structure as a guideline (where physician compensation is divided into categories: time/medical decision making/malpractice expense and practice expense), we developed a framework to examine the difference in practice expense of an in-person practice compared with a scaled virtual practice. Results: We found that for current procedural terminology (CPT) code 99213, the total relative value unit (RVU) for a virtual visit would be 1.62. The in-office RVU for CPT code 99213 is 2.09. This difference could serve as the basis for a rational discussion on differential reimbursement for virtual visits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信