Yaadwinder Shergill, Pierre Côté, Heather Shearer, Jessica J Wong, Maja Stupar, Anthony Tibbles, J David Cassidy
{"title":"魁北克特遣部队分类系统对新近发作的鞭扭伤相关疾病的内部可靠性。","authors":"Yaadwinder Shergill, Pierre Côté, Heather Shearer, Jessica J Wong, Maja Stupar, Anthony Tibbles, J David Cassidy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The inter-rater reliability of the Quebec Task Force (QTF) classification system for Whiplash-Associated Disorders (WAD) remains unknown. Our objective was to determine the inter-rater reliability of the WAD classification between an experienced chiropractic clinician and two chiropractic residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an inter-rater reliability study using baseline clinical data from 80 participants assessed for inclusion in a randomized clinical trial of the conservative management of WAD grades I and II. We reported reliability using Cohen's kappa (k) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean duration of WAD symptoms was 7.6 days (s.d.=5.2). In our study, the interrater reliability of the WAD grade classification varied from k=0.04 (95% CI -0.04 to 0.12) to k=0.80 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inter-rater reliability of the WAD classification varied greatly across raters and may be associated with the experience of the raters and with their understanding of the criteria. Our results suggest that clinicians may benefit from training to standardize how they classify WAD. Furthermore, our results need to be tested in a different sample of patients and with a range of clinicians from different clinical disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":38036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association","volume":"65 2","pages":"186-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480375/pdf/jcca-65-186.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-rater reliability of the Quebec Task Force classification system for recent-onset Whiplash Associated Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Yaadwinder Shergill, Pierre Côté, Heather Shearer, Jessica J Wong, Maja Stupar, Anthony Tibbles, J David Cassidy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The inter-rater reliability of the Quebec Task Force (QTF) classification system for Whiplash-Associated Disorders (WAD) remains unknown. Our objective was to determine the inter-rater reliability of the WAD classification between an experienced chiropractic clinician and two chiropractic residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an inter-rater reliability study using baseline clinical data from 80 participants assessed for inclusion in a randomized clinical trial of the conservative management of WAD grades I and II. We reported reliability using Cohen's kappa (k) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean duration of WAD symptoms was 7.6 days (s.d.=5.2). In our study, the interrater reliability of the WAD grade classification varied from k=0.04 (95% CI -0.04 to 0.12) to k=0.80 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inter-rater reliability of the WAD classification varied greatly across raters and may be associated with the experience of the raters and with their understanding of the criteria. Our results suggest that clinicians may benefit from training to standardize how they classify WAD. Furthermore, our results need to be tested in a different sample of patients and with a range of clinicians from different clinical disciplines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association\",\"volume\":\"65 2\",\"pages\":\"186-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480375/pdf/jcca-65-186.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:魁北克特遣部队(QTF)鞭打相关疾病(WAD)分类系统的内部可靠性仍然未知。我们的目的是确定一名经验丰富的脊椎指压临床医生和两名脊椎指压住院医生之间WAD分类的信度。方法:我们使用80名参与者的基线临床数据进行了评分间可靠性研究,这些数据被评估为纳入1级和2级WAD保守治疗的随机临床试验。我们使用Cohen’s kappa (k)和95%置信区间(CI)报告信度。结果:WAD症状的平均持续时间为7.6天(sd =5.2)。在我们的研究中,WAD等级分类的互译信度从k=0.04 (95% CI -0.04至0.12)到k=0.80 (95% CI 0.67至0.94)不等。结论:不同评分者对WAD分类的信度差异很大,可能与评分者的经验和对标准的理解有关。我们的研究结果表明,临床医生可能会从培训中受益,以规范他们如何分类WAD。此外,我们的结果需要在不同的患者样本和来自不同临床学科的一系列临床医生中进行测试。
Inter-rater reliability of the Quebec Task Force classification system for recent-onset Whiplash Associated Disorders.
Purpose: The inter-rater reliability of the Quebec Task Force (QTF) classification system for Whiplash-Associated Disorders (WAD) remains unknown. Our objective was to determine the inter-rater reliability of the WAD classification between an experienced chiropractic clinician and two chiropractic residents.
Methods: We conducted an inter-rater reliability study using baseline clinical data from 80 participants assessed for inclusion in a randomized clinical trial of the conservative management of WAD grades I and II. We reported reliability using Cohen's kappa (k) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: The mean duration of WAD symptoms was 7.6 days (s.d.=5.2). In our study, the interrater reliability of the WAD grade classification varied from k=0.04 (95% CI -0.04 to 0.12) to k=0.80 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.94).
Conclusion: Inter-rater reliability of the WAD classification varied greatly across raters and may be associated with the experience of the raters and with their understanding of the criteria. Our results suggest that clinicians may benefit from training to standardize how they classify WAD. Furthermore, our results need to be tested in a different sample of patients and with a range of clinicians from different clinical disciplines.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association (JCCA) publishes research papers, commentaries and editorials relevant to the practice of chiropractic.