成人疫苗接种不足:对疫苗支持者、未决定者和反对者报告的感知障碍的定性见解。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Primary Prevention Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s10935-021-00650-3
Zoi Tsimtsiou, Athina Tatsioni, Vasileios Gkizlis, Konstantinos Kolokas, Anastasia Papaioannou, Sofia Birka, Ilias Tirodimos, Ioanna Tsiligianni
{"title":"成人疫苗接种不足:对疫苗支持者、未决定者和反对者报告的感知障碍的定性见解。","authors":"Zoi Tsimtsiou,&nbsp;Athina Tatsioni,&nbsp;Vasileios Gkizlis,&nbsp;Konstantinos Kolokas,&nbsp;Anastasia Papaioannou,&nbsp;Sofia Birka,&nbsp;Ilias Tirodimos,&nbsp;Ioanna Tsiligianni","doi":"10.1007/s10935-021-00650-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although vaccination is one of the most cost-effective ways of preventing disease, vaccine hesitancy has been included among the ten threats of global health. Addressing low adult vaccination rates requires an adequate understanding of people's views. We explored perceived barriers to immunization among under-vaccinated adults to identify potential differences among vaccine supporters, refuters, and those who are undecided. We conducted a multi-center, mixed-methods study at 23 primary care practices in Greece. Each day, we asked three new randomly-selected adult healthcare users who attended the practice over the course of 30 consecutive working days. We used thematic content analysis to analyze their written answers to open-ended questions that addressed reasons for not getting vaccinated. Out of 1571 participants, two-thirds reported they were under-vaccinated as adults, thus accounting for three out of five of the supporters and the vast majority of the undecided and refuters. \"Concerns/fears,\" a \"perception of low susceptibility to disease due to good health status,\" the \"absence of healthcare professional's recommendation,\" and \"previous negative experiences\" were four themes common to all three groups. Additional barriers reported by supporters and the undecided included \"knowledge gaps about the necessity of adult vaccination,\" \"negligence,\" and lack of \"accessibility.\" Among refuters, additional themes identified were \"mistrust in pharmaceutical companies\" and \"disbelief in vaccine effectiveness.\" In conclusion, under-vaccination is common, not only among refuters or the undecided, but also among supporters of adult vaccination. We found similarities and differences in under-vaccinated adults' perceived barriers, depending on their individual perspectives. Physicians and public health services should take into consideration the impact of the wide range of attitudes and beliefs in their effort to address the underlying barriers to vaccination compliance as they attempt to increase vaccination coverage in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":47644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Prevention","volume":"42 6","pages":"625-640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520579/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Under-Vaccination in Adults: Qualitative Insights Into Perceived Barriers Reported by Vaccine Supporters, Undecided and Refuters.\",\"authors\":\"Zoi Tsimtsiou,&nbsp;Athina Tatsioni,&nbsp;Vasileios Gkizlis,&nbsp;Konstantinos Kolokas,&nbsp;Anastasia Papaioannou,&nbsp;Sofia Birka,&nbsp;Ilias Tirodimos,&nbsp;Ioanna Tsiligianni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10935-021-00650-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although vaccination is one of the most cost-effective ways of preventing disease, vaccine hesitancy has been included among the ten threats of global health. Addressing low adult vaccination rates requires an adequate understanding of people's views. We explored perceived barriers to immunization among under-vaccinated adults to identify potential differences among vaccine supporters, refuters, and those who are undecided. We conducted a multi-center, mixed-methods study at 23 primary care practices in Greece. Each day, we asked three new randomly-selected adult healthcare users who attended the practice over the course of 30 consecutive working days. We used thematic content analysis to analyze their written answers to open-ended questions that addressed reasons for not getting vaccinated. Out of 1571 participants, two-thirds reported they were under-vaccinated as adults, thus accounting for three out of five of the supporters and the vast majority of the undecided and refuters. \\\"Concerns/fears,\\\" a \\\"perception of low susceptibility to disease due to good health status,\\\" the \\\"absence of healthcare professional's recommendation,\\\" and \\\"previous negative experiences\\\" were four themes common to all three groups. Additional barriers reported by supporters and the undecided included \\\"knowledge gaps about the necessity of adult vaccination,\\\" \\\"negligence,\\\" and lack of \\\"accessibility.\\\" Among refuters, additional themes identified were \\\"mistrust in pharmaceutical companies\\\" and \\\"disbelief in vaccine effectiveness.\\\" In conclusion, under-vaccination is common, not only among refuters or the undecided, but also among supporters of adult vaccination. We found similarities and differences in under-vaccinated adults' perceived barriers, depending on their individual perspectives. Physicians and public health services should take into consideration the impact of the wide range of attitudes and beliefs in their effort to address the underlying barriers to vaccination compliance as they attempt to increase vaccination coverage in adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Primary Prevention\",\"volume\":\"42 6\",\"pages\":\"625-640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520579/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Primary Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-021-00650-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-021-00650-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

尽管疫苗接种是最具成本效益的疾病预防方法之一,但疫苗犹豫已被列入全球健康的十大威胁之一。解决成人疫苗接种率低的问题需要充分了解人们的看法。我们探讨了未接种疫苗的成年人的免疫障碍,以确定疫苗支持者、反对者和未决定者之间的潜在差异。我们在希腊的23个初级保健实践中进行了一项多中心、混合方法的研究。每天,我们随机选择三名新的成年医疗保健用户,他们在连续30个工作日内参加了该实践。我们使用主题内容分析来分析他们对开放式问题的书面回答,这些问题涉及不接种疫苗的原因。在1571名参与者中,三分之二的人报告说他们成年后接种疫苗不足,因此占五分之三的支持者和绝大多数未决定和反驳者。“担忧/恐惧”、“由于健康状况良好,对疾病的易感性较低”、“缺乏医疗保健专业人员的建议”和“以前的负面经历”是所有三组人共同的四个主题。支持者和未决定者报告的其他障碍包括“关于成人接种疫苗必要性的知识差距”、“疏忽”和缺乏“可及性”。在反驳者中,确定的其他主题是“对制药公司的不信任”和“不相信疫苗的有效性”。总之,疫苗接种不足是很常见的,不仅在反驳者或犹豫不决者中,而且在成人疫苗接种的支持者中也是如此。我们发现疫苗接种不足的成年人感知障碍的相似性和差异性取决于他们的个人观点。医生和公共卫生服务机构在努力解决疫苗接种依从性的潜在障碍时,应考虑到各种各样的态度和信仰的影响,因为他们试图增加成人的疫苗接种覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Under-Vaccination in Adults: Qualitative Insights Into Perceived Barriers Reported by Vaccine Supporters, Undecided and Refuters.

Although vaccination is one of the most cost-effective ways of preventing disease, vaccine hesitancy has been included among the ten threats of global health. Addressing low adult vaccination rates requires an adequate understanding of people's views. We explored perceived barriers to immunization among under-vaccinated adults to identify potential differences among vaccine supporters, refuters, and those who are undecided. We conducted a multi-center, mixed-methods study at 23 primary care practices in Greece. Each day, we asked three new randomly-selected adult healthcare users who attended the practice over the course of 30 consecutive working days. We used thematic content analysis to analyze their written answers to open-ended questions that addressed reasons for not getting vaccinated. Out of 1571 participants, two-thirds reported they were under-vaccinated as adults, thus accounting for three out of five of the supporters and the vast majority of the undecided and refuters. "Concerns/fears," a "perception of low susceptibility to disease due to good health status," the "absence of healthcare professional's recommendation," and "previous negative experiences" were four themes common to all three groups. Additional barriers reported by supporters and the undecided included "knowledge gaps about the necessity of adult vaccination," "negligence," and lack of "accessibility." Among refuters, additional themes identified were "mistrust in pharmaceutical companies" and "disbelief in vaccine effectiveness." In conclusion, under-vaccination is common, not only among refuters or the undecided, but also among supporters of adult vaccination. We found similarities and differences in under-vaccinated adults' perceived barriers, depending on their individual perspectives. Physicians and public health services should take into consideration the impact of the wide range of attitudes and beliefs in their effort to address the underlying barriers to vaccination compliance as they attempt to increase vaccination coverage in adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Primary Prevention
Journal of Primary Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prevention is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes manuscripts aimed at reducing negative social and health outcomes and promoting human health and well-being. It publishes high-quality research that discusses evidence-based interventions, policies, and practices. The editions cover a wide range of prevention science themes and value diverse populations, age groups, and methodologies. Our target audiences are prevention scientists, practitioners, and policymakers from diverse geographic locations. Specific types of papers published in the journal include Original Research, Research Methods, Practitioner Narrative, Debate, Brief Reports, Letter to the Editor, Policy, and Reviews. The selection of articles for publication is based on their innovation, contribution to the field of prevention, and quality. The Journal of Prevention differs from other similar journals in the field by offering a more culturally and geographically diverse team of editors, a broader range of subjects and methodologies, and the intention to attract the readership of prevention practitioners and other stakeholders (alongside scientists).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信