Valeria Crispiatico, Cinzia Baldanzi, Arianna Napoletano, Laura Tomasoni, Francesca Tedeschi, Elisabetta Groppo, Marco Rovaris, Chiara Vitali, Davide Cattaneo
{"title":"语音康复对多发性硬化症患者的影响:一项双盲长期随机对照试验。","authors":"Valeria Crispiatico, Cinzia Baldanzi, Arianna Napoletano, Laura Tomasoni, Francesca Tedeschi, Elisabetta Groppo, Marco Rovaris, Chiara Vitali, Davide Cattaneo","doi":"10.1177/13524585211051059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypophonia is a prevailing problem in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of voice rehabilitation is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify the most effective method to reduce hypophonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 44 PwMS were randomized to intensive and high-effort voice treatment groups, the LSVT-LOUD<sup>®</sup>, and conventional treatment group. Subjects received 16 treatments (4 sessions/week) lasting 45 minutes. The primary outcome was voice intensity (dB) in monologue, vocalization, and sentences while voice handicap index (VHI) measured voice self-perception. Outcomes were assessed by a blinded observer at baseline, post-treatment, and 15-month follow-up (FU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear models revealed a significant post-intervention between-group mean difference in favor of LSVT-LOUD for monologue: +6.3 dB (95% CI: 2.5 to 10.1); vocalization: +7.4 dB (95% CI: 2.3 to 12.5); and sentences: +9.5 dB (95% CI: 4.7 to 14.3). However, 43.7% PwMS in the LSVT-LOUD and 10% in the conventional treatment group obtained a full recovery of voice intensity (>60 dB) post-treatment, Fisher's test = 13.3, <i>p</i> < 0.01. However, these improvements were not maintained at FU. Between-group differences at VHI were -10.8 (95% CI: -21.2 to -0.4) and -11.3 (95% CI: -24.3 to -1.7) in favor of LSVT-LOUD at post and FU.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LSVT-LOUD can be a valid treatment to increase voice intensity in PwMS. However, results suggest the need for FU interventions targeting maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":520714,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1081-1090"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of voice rehabilitation in people with MS: A double-blinded long-term randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Valeria Crispiatico, Cinzia Baldanzi, Arianna Napoletano, Laura Tomasoni, Francesca Tedeschi, Elisabetta Groppo, Marco Rovaris, Chiara Vitali, Davide Cattaneo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13524585211051059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypophonia is a prevailing problem in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of voice rehabilitation is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify the most effective method to reduce hypophonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 44 PwMS were randomized to intensive and high-effort voice treatment groups, the LSVT-LOUD<sup>®</sup>, and conventional treatment group. Subjects received 16 treatments (4 sessions/week) lasting 45 minutes. The primary outcome was voice intensity (dB) in monologue, vocalization, and sentences while voice handicap index (VHI) measured voice self-perception. Outcomes were assessed by a blinded observer at baseline, post-treatment, and 15-month follow-up (FU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear models revealed a significant post-intervention between-group mean difference in favor of LSVT-LOUD for monologue: +6.3 dB (95% CI: 2.5 to 10.1); vocalization: +7.4 dB (95% CI: 2.3 to 12.5); and sentences: +9.5 dB (95% CI: 4.7 to 14.3). However, 43.7% PwMS in the LSVT-LOUD and 10% in the conventional treatment group obtained a full recovery of voice intensity (>60 dB) post-treatment, Fisher's test = 13.3, <i>p</i> < 0.01. However, these improvements were not maintained at FU. Between-group differences at VHI were -10.8 (95% CI: -21.2 to -0.4) and -11.3 (95% CI: -24.3 to -1.7) in favor of LSVT-LOUD at post and FU.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LSVT-LOUD can be a valid treatment to increase voice intensity in PwMS. However, results suggest the need for FU interventions targeting maintenance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1081-1090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585211051059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585211051059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:声音减退是多发性硬化症(PwMS)患者普遍存在的问题。然而,支持语音康复有效性的证据缺乏。目的:本研究的目的是找出最有效的方法来减少低音症。方法:在本随机对照试验中,44名PwMS随机分为强化和高强度语音治疗组、LSVT-LOUD®和常规治疗组。受试者共接受16次治疗(4次/周),疗程45分钟。主要结果是独白、发声和句子中的声音强度(dB),而声音障碍指数(VHI)测量声音自我感知。结果由盲法观察者在基线、治疗后和15个月随访(FU)进行评估。结果:线性模型显示,干预后组间平均差异显著,有利于独白的LSVT-LOUD: +6.3 dB (95% CI: 2.5至10.1);发声:+7.4 dB (95% CI: 2.3 ~ 12.5);和句子:+9.5 dB (95% CI: 4.7 ~ 14.3)。然而,LSVT-LOUD组43.7%的PwMS和常规治疗组10%的PwMS治疗后声音强度完全恢复(>60 dB), Fisher检验= 13.3,p。结论:LSVT-LOUD可以有效地提高PwMS的声音强度。然而,结果表明需要针对维持FU干预措施。
Effects of voice rehabilitation in people with MS: A double-blinded long-term randomized controlled trial.
Background: Hypophonia is a prevailing problem in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of voice rehabilitation is lacking.
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the most effective method to reduce hypophonia.
Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 44 PwMS were randomized to intensive and high-effort voice treatment groups, the LSVT-LOUD®, and conventional treatment group. Subjects received 16 treatments (4 sessions/week) lasting 45 minutes. The primary outcome was voice intensity (dB) in monologue, vocalization, and sentences while voice handicap index (VHI) measured voice self-perception. Outcomes were assessed by a blinded observer at baseline, post-treatment, and 15-month follow-up (FU).
Results: Linear models revealed a significant post-intervention between-group mean difference in favor of LSVT-LOUD for monologue: +6.3 dB (95% CI: 2.5 to 10.1); vocalization: +7.4 dB (95% CI: 2.3 to 12.5); and sentences: +9.5 dB (95% CI: 4.7 to 14.3). However, 43.7% PwMS in the LSVT-LOUD and 10% in the conventional treatment group obtained a full recovery of voice intensity (>60 dB) post-treatment, Fisher's test = 13.3, p < 0.01. However, these improvements were not maintained at FU. Between-group differences at VHI were -10.8 (95% CI: -21.2 to -0.4) and -11.3 (95% CI: -24.3 to -1.7) in favor of LSVT-LOUD at post and FU.
Conclusion: LSVT-LOUD can be a valid treatment to increase voice intensity in PwMS. However, results suggest the need for FU interventions targeting maintenance.