Noémie Chaniaud, Camille Sagnier, Olga Megalakaki, Emilie Loup-Escande
{"title":"家庭联网医疗设备在门诊手术中的效率、效果和易学性的关系。","authors":"Noémie Chaniaud, Camille Sagnier, Olga Megalakaki, Emilie Loup-Escande","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b><i>Currently, usability assessments of home connected medical devices do not systematically take into account</i> learnability <i>metrics. In case of the</i> Smart Angel <i>device</i>-<i>designed for monitoring ambulatory surgery patients</i>-<i>users are trained at the hospital and have to use the device at home to monitor their health remotely</i>. <b><i>Objective:</i></b><i>The aim of this study was to better understand the relationships between two metrics of usability</i>-efficiency <i>and</i> effectiveness-<i>and</i> learnability <i>of the</i> Smart Angel <i>device</i>. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b><i>Twenty-eight participants were trained in a simulated hospital (</i>SimUsanté<i>), and then we filmed the participant using the device three times. Between each session, the participant had to complete questionnaires (sociodemographic and health literacy)</i>. <b><i>Results:</i></b><i>The results of a between-subject analysis [χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 18.969,</i> p <i>< 0.001] and a within-subject analysis [</i>F<i>(2.28) = 13.34,</i> p <i>< 0.001,</i> η<sup><i>2</i></sup><i> = 0.35] showed that</i> efficiency <i>(manipulation time) significantly improved with</i> learnability <i>(number of sessions). Conversely,</i> effectiveness <i>(number of manipulation errors) stagnated over the three sessions with a between-subject analysis</i> [F<i>(2.75) = 1.628,</i> p<i> = 0.203], while the within-subject analysis revealed that users seemed to significantly correct their errors with the number of sessions [</i>F<i>(2.28) = 6,</i> p<i> = 0.005,</i> η<sup><i>2</i></sup><i> = 0.19]. By analyzing the errors, we observed that some errors could appear at any time (e.g., moving during the measurement) and others were systematic (e.g., the wrist blood pressure on the right arm).</i><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b><i>While the \"first attempt\" at using a home medical device is a major revealing step for the study of manipulation errors, learnability is an equally useful metric to include in usability studies, as well as in the very definition itself of usability.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"904-911"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Learnability of Home Connected Medical Device in Ambulatory Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Noémie Chaniaud, Camille Sagnier, Olga Megalakaki, Emilie Loup-Escande\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2021.0233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b><i>Currently, usability assessments of home connected medical devices do not systematically take into account</i> learnability <i>metrics. In case of the</i> Smart Angel <i>device</i>-<i>designed for monitoring ambulatory surgery patients</i>-<i>users are trained at the hospital and have to use the device at home to monitor their health remotely</i>. <b><i>Objective:</i></b><i>The aim of this study was to better understand the relationships between two metrics of usability</i>-efficiency <i>and</i> effectiveness-<i>and</i> learnability <i>of the</i> Smart Angel <i>device</i>. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b><i>Twenty-eight participants were trained in a simulated hospital (</i>SimUsanté<i>), and then we filmed the participant using the device three times. Between each session, the participant had to complete questionnaires (sociodemographic and health literacy)</i>. <b><i>Results:</i></b><i>The results of a between-subject analysis [χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 18.969,</i> p <i>< 0.001] and a within-subject analysis [</i>F<i>(2.28) = 13.34,</i> p <i>< 0.001,</i> η<sup><i>2</i></sup><i> = 0.35] showed that</i> efficiency <i>(manipulation time) significantly improved with</i> learnability <i>(number of sessions). Conversely,</i> effectiveness <i>(number of manipulation errors) stagnated over the three sessions with a between-subject analysis</i> [F<i>(2.75) = 1.628,</i> p<i> = 0.203], while the within-subject analysis revealed that users seemed to significantly correct their errors with the number of sessions [</i>F<i>(2.28) = 6,</i> p<i> = 0.005,</i> η<sup><i>2</i></sup><i> = 0.19]. By analyzing the errors, we observed that some errors could appear at any time (e.g., moving during the measurement) and others were systematic (e.g., the wrist blood pressure on the right arm).</i><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b><i>While the \\\"first attempt\\\" at using a home medical device is a major revealing step for the study of manipulation errors, learnability is an equally useful metric to include in usability studies, as well as in the very definition itself of usability.</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"904-911\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目前,家庭联网医疗设备的可用性评估没有系统地考虑易学性指标。智能天使设备是为监测门诊手术患者而设计的,用户在医院接受培训,必须在家中使用该设备远程监测他们的健康状况。目的:本研究的目的是更好地理解智能天使设备的两个可用性指标-效率和有效性-易学性之间的关系。材料和方法:28名参与者在模拟医院(simusant)接受培训,然后我们拍摄参与者使用该设备三次。在每次会议之间,参与者必须完成问卷调查(社会人口和健康素养)。结果:受试者间分析[χ2(2) = 18.969, p < 0.001]和受试者内分析[F(2.28) = 13.34, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.35]结果显示,效率(操作时间)随易学性(学习次数)的增加而显著提高。相反,在受试者间分析中,有效性(操作错误次数)在三次会话中停滞不前[F(2.75) = 1.628, p = 0.203],而在受试者内分析中,用户似乎随着会话次数的增加而显著纠正了他们的错误[F(2.28) = 6, p = 0.005, η2 = 0.19]。通过对误差的分析,我们发现有些误差可以在任何时候出现(例如测量过程中的移动),有些误差是系统的(例如右臂腕部血压)。结论:虽然使用家用医疗设备的“第一次尝试”是研究操作错误的主要揭示步骤,但可学习性是可用性研究中同样有用的指标,以及可用性的定义本身。
Relationship Between Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Learnability of Home Connected Medical Device in Ambulatory Surgery.
Background:Currently, usability assessments of home connected medical devices do not systematically take into account learnability metrics. In case of the Smart Angel device-designed for monitoring ambulatory surgery patients-users are trained at the hospital and have to use the device at home to monitor their health remotely. Objective:The aim of this study was to better understand the relationships between two metrics of usability-efficiency and effectiveness-and learnability of the Smart Angel device. Materials and Methods:Twenty-eight participants were trained in a simulated hospital (SimUsanté), and then we filmed the participant using the device three times. Between each session, the participant had to complete questionnaires (sociodemographic and health literacy). Results:The results of a between-subject analysis [χ2(2) = 18.969, p < 0.001] and a within-subject analysis [F(2.28) = 13.34, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.35] showed that efficiency (manipulation time) significantly improved with learnability (number of sessions). Conversely, effectiveness (number of manipulation errors) stagnated over the three sessions with a between-subject analysis [F(2.75) = 1.628, p = 0.203], while the within-subject analysis revealed that users seemed to significantly correct their errors with the number of sessions [F(2.28) = 6, p = 0.005, η2 = 0.19]. By analyzing the errors, we observed that some errors could appear at any time (e.g., moving during the measurement) and others were systematic (e.g., the wrist blood pressure on the right arm).Conclusions:While the "first attempt" at using a home medical device is a major revealing step for the study of manipulation errors, learnability is an equally useful metric to include in usability studies, as well as in the very definition itself of usability.