脉冲超声骨再生-结果和障碍在临床应用:系统回顾。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
R Puts, R Vico, N Beilfuß, M Shaka, F Padilla, K Raum
{"title":"脉冲超声骨再生-结果和障碍在临床应用:系统回顾。","authors":"R Puts,&nbsp;R Vico,&nbsp;N Beilfuß,&nbsp;M Shaka,&nbsp;F Padilla,&nbsp;K Raum","doi":"10.22203/eCM.v042a20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Impaired bone-fracture healing is associated with long-term musculoskeletal disability, pain and psychological distress. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a non-invasive and side-effect-free treatment option for fresh, delayed- and non-union bone fractures, which has been used in patients since the early 1990s. Several clinical studies, however, have questioned the usefulness of the LIPUS treatment for the regeneration of long bones, including those with a compromised healing. This systematic review addresses the hurdles that the clinical application of LIPUS encounters. Low patient compliance might disguise the effects of the LIPUS therapy, as observed in several studies. Furthermore, large discrepancies in results, showing profound LIPUS effects in regeneration of small-animal bones in comparison to the clinical studies, could be caused by the suboptimal parameters of the clinical set-up. This raises the question of whether the so-called \"acoustic dose\" requires a thorough characterisation to reveal the mechanisms of the therapy. The adequate definition of the acoustic dose is especially important in the elderly population and patients with underlying medical conditions, where distinct biological signatures lead to a delayed regeneration. Non-industry-funded, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of the LIPUS application alone and as an adjuvant treatment for bones with complicated healing, where consistent control of patient compliance is ensured, are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":11849,"journal":{"name":"European cells & materials","volume":"42 ","pages":"281-311"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulsed ultrasound for bone regeneration - outcomes and hurdles in the clinical application: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"R Puts,&nbsp;R Vico,&nbsp;N Beilfuß,&nbsp;M Shaka,&nbsp;F Padilla,&nbsp;K Raum\",\"doi\":\"10.22203/eCM.v042a20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Impaired bone-fracture healing is associated with long-term musculoskeletal disability, pain and psychological distress. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a non-invasive and side-effect-free treatment option for fresh, delayed- and non-union bone fractures, which has been used in patients since the early 1990s. Several clinical studies, however, have questioned the usefulness of the LIPUS treatment for the regeneration of long bones, including those with a compromised healing. This systematic review addresses the hurdles that the clinical application of LIPUS encounters. Low patient compliance might disguise the effects of the LIPUS therapy, as observed in several studies. Furthermore, large discrepancies in results, showing profound LIPUS effects in regeneration of small-animal bones in comparison to the clinical studies, could be caused by the suboptimal parameters of the clinical set-up. This raises the question of whether the so-called \\\"acoustic dose\\\" requires a thorough characterisation to reveal the mechanisms of the therapy. The adequate definition of the acoustic dose is especially important in the elderly population and patients with underlying medical conditions, where distinct biological signatures lead to a delayed regeneration. Non-industry-funded, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of the LIPUS application alone and as an adjuvant treatment for bones with complicated healing, where consistent control of patient compliance is ensured, are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European cells & materials\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"281-311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European cells & materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v042a20\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European cells & materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v042a20","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

骨折愈合受损与长期肌肉骨骼残疾、疼痛和心理困扰有关。低强度脉冲超声(LIPUS)是一种无创、无副作用的治疗新发、延迟性和不愈合骨折的选择,自20世纪90年代初以来一直用于患者。然而,一些临床研究质疑LIPUS治疗长骨再生的有效性,包括那些愈合受损的长骨。本系统综述解决了LIPUS临床应用遇到的障碍。正如几项研究所观察到的那样,患者依从性低可能会掩盖LIPUS治疗的效果。此外,与临床研究相比,LIPUS在小动物骨骼再生中显示出深刻的影响,结果的巨大差异可能是由临床设置的次优参数引起的。这就提出了一个问题,即所谓的“声剂量”是否需要一个彻底的特征来揭示治疗的机制。在老年人群和有潜在疾病的患者中,声学剂量的适当定义尤为重要,因为在这些人群中,不同的生物特征导致再生延迟。需要对LIPUS单独应用和作为复杂愈合骨的辅助治疗进行非行业资助、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验,以确保患者依从性的一致性控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulsed ultrasound for bone regeneration - outcomes and hurdles in the clinical application: a systematic review.

Impaired bone-fracture healing is associated with long-term musculoskeletal disability, pain and psychological distress. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a non-invasive and side-effect-free treatment option for fresh, delayed- and non-union bone fractures, which has been used in patients since the early 1990s. Several clinical studies, however, have questioned the usefulness of the LIPUS treatment for the regeneration of long bones, including those with a compromised healing. This systematic review addresses the hurdles that the clinical application of LIPUS encounters. Low patient compliance might disguise the effects of the LIPUS therapy, as observed in several studies. Furthermore, large discrepancies in results, showing profound LIPUS effects in regeneration of small-animal bones in comparison to the clinical studies, could be caused by the suboptimal parameters of the clinical set-up. This raises the question of whether the so-called "acoustic dose" requires a thorough characterisation to reveal the mechanisms of the therapy. The adequate definition of the acoustic dose is especially important in the elderly population and patients with underlying medical conditions, where distinct biological signatures lead to a delayed regeneration. Non-industry-funded, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of the LIPUS application alone and as an adjuvant treatment for bones with complicated healing, where consistent control of patient compliance is ensured, are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European cells & materials
European cells & materials 生物-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: eCM provides an interdisciplinary forum for publication of preclinical research in the musculoskeletal field (Trauma, Maxillofacial (including dental), Spine and Orthopaedics). The clinical relevance of the work must be briefly mentioned within the abstract, and in more detail in the paper. Poor abstracts which do not concisely cover the paper contents will not be sent for review. Incremental steps in research will not be entertained by eCM journal.Cross-disciplinary papers that go across our scope areas are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信