急诊科高级心血管风险预测:更新临床预测模型-大型数据库研究方案

Charles Reynard, Glen P Martin, Evangelos Kontopantelis, David A Jenkins, Anthony Heagerty, Brian McMillan, Anisa Jafar, Rajendar Garlapati, Richard Body
{"title":"急诊科高级心血管风险预测:更新临床预测模型-大型数据库研究方案","authors":"Charles Reynard,&nbsp;Glen P Martin,&nbsp;Evangelos Kontopantelis,&nbsp;David A Jenkins,&nbsp;Anthony Heagerty,&nbsp;Brian McMillan,&nbsp;Anisa Jafar,&nbsp;Rajendar Garlapati,&nbsp;Richard Body","doi":"10.1186/s41512-021-00105-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients presenting with chest pain represent a large proportion of attendances to emergency departments. In these patients clinicians often consider the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the timely recognition and treatment of which is clinically important. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been used to enhance early diagnosis of AMI. The Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid is currently in clinical use across Greater Manchester. CPMs have been shown to deteriorate over time through calibration drift. We aim to assess potential calibration drift with T-MACS and compare methods for updating the model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will use routinely collected electronic data from patients who were treated using TMACS at two large NHS hospitals. This is estimated to include approximately 14,000 patient episodes spanning June 2016 to October 2020. The primary outcome of acute myocardial infarction will be sourced from NHS Digital's admitted patient care dataset. We will assess the calibration drift of the existing model and the benefit of updating the CPM by model recalibration, model extension and dynamic updating. These models will be validated by bootstrapping and one step ahead prequential testing. We will evaluate predictive performance using calibrations plots and c-statistics. We will also examine the reclassification of predicted probability with the updated TMACS model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CPMs are widely used in modern medicine, but are vulnerable to deteriorating calibration over time. Ongoing refinement using routinely collected electronic data will inevitably be more efficient than deriving and validating new models. In this analysis we will seek to exemplify methods for updating CPMs to protect the initial investment of time and effort. If successful, the updating methods could be used to continually refine the algorithm used within TMACS, maintaining or even improving predictive performance over time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN number: ISRCTN41008456.</p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":" ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499458/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model - a large database study protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Reynard,&nbsp;Glen P Martin,&nbsp;Evangelos Kontopantelis,&nbsp;David A Jenkins,&nbsp;Anthony Heagerty,&nbsp;Brian McMillan,&nbsp;Anisa Jafar,&nbsp;Rajendar Garlapati,&nbsp;Richard Body\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41512-021-00105-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients presenting with chest pain represent a large proportion of attendances to emergency departments. In these patients clinicians often consider the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the timely recognition and treatment of which is clinically important. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been used to enhance early diagnosis of AMI. The Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid is currently in clinical use across Greater Manchester. CPMs have been shown to deteriorate over time through calibration drift. We aim to assess potential calibration drift with T-MACS and compare methods for updating the model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will use routinely collected electronic data from patients who were treated using TMACS at two large NHS hospitals. This is estimated to include approximately 14,000 patient episodes spanning June 2016 to October 2020. The primary outcome of acute myocardial infarction will be sourced from NHS Digital's admitted patient care dataset. We will assess the calibration drift of the existing model and the benefit of updating the CPM by model recalibration, model extension and dynamic updating. These models will be validated by bootstrapping and one step ahead prequential testing. We will evaluate predictive performance using calibrations plots and c-statistics. We will also examine the reclassification of predicted probability with the updated TMACS model.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CPMs are widely used in modern medicine, but are vulnerable to deteriorating calibration over time. Ongoing refinement using routinely collected electronic data will inevitably be more efficient than deriving and validating new models. In this analysis we will seek to exemplify methods for updating CPMs to protect the initial investment of time and effort. If successful, the updating methods could be used to continually refine the algorithm used within TMACS, maintaining or even improving predictive performance over time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN number: ISRCTN41008456.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and prognostic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00105-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00105-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:胸痛患者在急诊科就诊人数中占很大比例。在这些患者中,临床医生经常考虑急性心肌梗死(AMI)的诊断,及时识别和治疗具有重要的临床意义。临床预测模型(CPMs)已被用于提高AMI的早期诊断。仅肌钙蛋白曼彻斯特急性冠脉综合征(T-MACS)决策辅助目前在大曼彻斯特的临床使用。cpm已被证明会随着时间的推移而通过校准漂移而恶化。我们的目标是评估T-MACS潜在的校准漂移,并比较更新模型的方法。方法:我们将使用常规收集的来自两家大型NHS医院使用TMACS治疗的患者的电子数据。据估计,这包括2016年6月至2020年10月期间约14,000例患者发作。急性心肌梗死的主要结局将来自NHS Digital的住院患者护理数据集。我们将评估现有模型的校准漂移以及通过模型再校准、模型扩展和动态更新来更新CPM的好处。这些模型将通过引导和先行一步的测试来验证。我们将使用校准图和c统计来评估预测性能。我们还将使用更新的TMACS模型来研究预测概率的重新分类。讨论:cpm在现代医学中广泛使用,但随着时间的推移,校准容易恶化。使用常规收集的电子数据进行改进将不可避免地比推导和验证新模型更有效。在本分析中,我们将寻求举例说明更新cpm以保护初始时间和精力投资的方法。如果成功,可以使用更新方法不断改进TMACS中使用的算法,随着时间的推移保持甚至提高预测性能。试验注册:ISRCTN号:ISRCTN41008456。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advanced cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: updating a clinical prediction model - a large database study protocol.

Background: Patients presenting with chest pain represent a large proportion of attendances to emergency departments. In these patients clinicians often consider the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the timely recognition and treatment of which is clinically important. Clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been used to enhance early diagnosis of AMI. The Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid is currently in clinical use across Greater Manchester. CPMs have been shown to deteriorate over time through calibration drift. We aim to assess potential calibration drift with T-MACS and compare methods for updating the model.

Methods: We will use routinely collected electronic data from patients who were treated using TMACS at two large NHS hospitals. This is estimated to include approximately 14,000 patient episodes spanning June 2016 to October 2020. The primary outcome of acute myocardial infarction will be sourced from NHS Digital's admitted patient care dataset. We will assess the calibration drift of the existing model and the benefit of updating the CPM by model recalibration, model extension and dynamic updating. These models will be validated by bootstrapping and one step ahead prequential testing. We will evaluate predictive performance using calibrations plots and c-statistics. We will also examine the reclassification of predicted probability with the updated TMACS model.

Discussion: CPMs are widely used in modern medicine, but are vulnerable to deteriorating calibration over time. Ongoing refinement using routinely collected electronic data will inevitably be more efficient than deriving and validating new models. In this analysis we will seek to exemplify methods for updating CPMs to protect the initial investment of time and effort. If successful, the updating methods could be used to continually refine the algorithm used within TMACS, maintaining or even improving predictive performance over time.

Trial registration: ISRCTN number: ISRCTN41008456.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信