首次为南美锥虫病心脏病患者适当植入除颤器电击

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Luis G García-Chamorro, Ezequiel J Zaidel, Lara Gheco, Matías A Oliva, Alejandro de-la-Vega, Agustín Orosco, Juan Armentano, Álvaro Sosa-Liprandi
{"title":"首次为南美锥虫病心脏病患者适当植入除颤器电击","authors":"Luis G García-Chamorro, Ezequiel J Zaidel, Lara Gheco, Matías A Oliva, Alejandro de-la-Vega, Agustín Orosco, Juan Armentano, Álvaro Sosa-Liprandi","doi":"10.24875/ACM.21000218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objetives: </strong>To assess if patients with Chagasic heart disease (CHD) received effective automatic implantable defibrillator (AID) shocks earlier than patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of patients with CHD and IHD who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) between 2009 and 2018, in a tertiary hospital. We evaluated the time between the implant of ICD and the first effective shock in patients with CHD and compared it with the IHD control population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included a total of 64 patients, 20 with CHD and 44 with IHD. CHD patients presented earlier an effective shock than patients with IHD during the first year (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.4; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 2.09-34.02; p = 0.0027), and at three years (HR: 4.61; 95%CI: 1.51-14.07; p = 0.0072). 100% of CHD patients who received the ICD as secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death presented an effective shock during the first 26 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with CHD received effective ICD shocks earlier than the IHD patients. All patients with CHD and ICD as secondary prevention had an appropriate ICD shock at short term, representing the highest risk population, and supporting the indication of the device in a setting where randomized clinical trials are lacking.</p>","PeriodicalId":8360,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/4b/6936AX213-ACM-92-342.PMC9262299.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First appropriate implantable defibrillator shocks in patients with Chagasic heart disease\",\"authors\":\"Luis G García-Chamorro, Ezequiel J Zaidel, Lara Gheco, Matías A Oliva, Alejandro de-la-Vega, Agustín Orosco, Juan Armentano, Álvaro Sosa-Liprandi\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/ACM.21000218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objetives: </strong>To assess if patients with Chagasic heart disease (CHD) received effective automatic implantable defibrillator (AID) shocks earlier than patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of patients with CHD and IHD who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) between 2009 and 2018, in a tertiary hospital. We evaluated the time between the implant of ICD and the first effective shock in patients with CHD and compared it with the IHD control population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included a total of 64 patients, 20 with CHD and 44 with IHD. CHD patients presented earlier an effective shock than patients with IHD during the first year (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.4; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 2.09-34.02; p = 0.0027), and at three years (HR: 4.61; 95%CI: 1.51-14.07; p = 0.0072). 100% of CHD patients who received the ICD as secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death presented an effective shock during the first 26 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with CHD received effective ICD shocks earlier than the IHD patients. All patients with CHD and ICD as secondary prevention had an appropriate ICD shock at short term, representing the highest risk population, and supporting the indication of the device in a setting where randomized clinical trials are lacking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/4b/6936AX213-ACM-92-342.PMC9262299.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.21000218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.21000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估恰加斯性心脏病(CHD)患者是否比缺血性心脏病(IHD)患者更早接受有效的自动植入式除颤器(AID)冲击:2009年至2018年间在一家三级医院接受植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗的CHD和IHD患者的回顾性队列。我们评估了心脏病患者从植入 ICD 到首次有效电击之间的时间,并与 IHD 对照组人群进行了比较:结果:我们共纳入了 64 名患者,其中 20 名为心脏病患者,44 名为 IHD 患者。在第一年(危险比 [HR]:8.4;95% 置信区间 [95%CI]:2.09-34.02;P = 0.0027)和三年(HR:4.61;95%CI:1.51-14.07;P = 0.0072),冠心病患者比 IHD 患者更早出现有效电击。接受 ICD 作为心脏性猝死二级预防的心脏病患者中,100% 在最初 26 个月的随访中出现有效电击:结论:冠心病患者比心肌梗死患者更早接受有效的 ICD 电击。所有接受 ICD 作为二级预防的冠心病患者都在短期内接受了适当的 ICD 电击,代表了最高风险人群,并支持在缺乏随机临床试验的情况下使用该设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

First appropriate implantable defibrillator shocks in patients with Chagasic heart disease

First appropriate implantable defibrillator shocks in patients with Chagasic heart disease

First appropriate implantable defibrillator shocks in patients with Chagasic heart disease

First appropriate implantable defibrillator shocks in patients with Chagasic heart disease

Objetives: To assess if patients with Chagasic heart disease (CHD) received effective automatic implantable defibrillator (AID) shocks earlier than patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients with CHD and IHD who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) between 2009 and 2018, in a tertiary hospital. We evaluated the time between the implant of ICD and the first effective shock in patients with CHD and compared it with the IHD control population.

Results: We included a total of 64 patients, 20 with CHD and 44 with IHD. CHD patients presented earlier an effective shock than patients with IHD during the first year (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.4; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 2.09-34.02; p = 0.0027), and at three years (HR: 4.61; 95%CI: 1.51-14.07; p = 0.0072). 100% of CHD patients who received the ICD as secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death presented an effective shock during the first 26 months of follow-up.

Conclusions: Patients with CHD received effective ICD shocks earlier than the IHD patients. All patients with CHD and ICD as secondary prevention had an appropriate ICD shock at short term, representing the highest risk population, and supporting the indication of the device in a setting where randomized clinical trials are lacking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico
Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信