美国精神障碍和sud雇员的残疾和工人赔偿趋势。

The Mental Health Clinician Pub Date : 2021-09-24 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI:10.9740/mhc.2021.09.279
Richard A Brook, Nathan L Kleinman, Ian A Beren
{"title":"美国精神障碍和sud雇员的残疾和工人赔偿趋势。","authors":"Richard A Brook, Nathan L Kleinman, Ian A Beren","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2021.09.279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction US employee absence benefits may include workers' compensation (WC) for work-related injuries/illnesses, short- and long-term disability (STD and LTD, respectively) for non–work-related injuries/illnesses, and discretionary sick leave (SL). Absences can significantly impact business performance, and employers are intensifying efforts to manage benefits and connections with employee health. This research compares all-cause STD/LTD/WC/SL use and variation from baseline (2002) for eligible employees (EMPs) with mental disorders (MDs) and SUDs to determine if use/payments varied over time. Methods Employees incurring medical claims with Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality MD and SUD ICD-9/10 codes were identified in the WorkPartners database (January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2019). Retrospective analysis was performed on annual prevalence, benefit use, mean days of leave, and median payments as a percent of salary (including lump-sum distributions and potentially extending beyond initiation year). WC claims without work absences were excluded. For each benefit, annual outcomes were calculated as a percent of baseline to show variability. Results Use was 48.1% to 202.2% (median, 102.8%) of baseline rates for SL (SUD-EMPs), and 87.3% to 108.4% (median, 97.3%) for STD (MD-EMPs). Days of LTD leaves were 21.5% to 657.8% (median, 359.2%) of baseline days (MD-EMPs), and 122.7% to 1042.2% (median, 460.0%) of baseline days for (SUD-EMPs). Median payments for WC were 78.6% to 253.6% (median, 114.6%) of baseline (MD-EMPs) and 97.9% to 481.6% (median, 104.0%) for SUD-EMPs. Discussion Employees with MD/SUD used absence benefits at differing rates over time with varying days of leave and payments as a percent of salary. Using a constant cost or salary replacement factor over time for all benefits is not accurate or appropriate.","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"11 5","pages":"279-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/c0/i2168-9709-11-5-279.PMC8463001.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability and workers' compensation trends for employees with mental disorders and SUDs in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Richard A Brook, Nathan L Kleinman, Ian A Beren\",\"doi\":\"10.9740/mhc.2021.09.279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction US employee absence benefits may include workers' compensation (WC) for work-related injuries/illnesses, short- and long-term disability (STD and LTD, respectively) for non–work-related injuries/illnesses, and discretionary sick leave (SL). Absences can significantly impact business performance, and employers are intensifying efforts to manage benefits and connections with employee health. This research compares all-cause STD/LTD/WC/SL use and variation from baseline (2002) for eligible employees (EMPs) with mental disorders (MDs) and SUDs to determine if use/payments varied over time. Methods Employees incurring medical claims with Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality MD and SUD ICD-9/10 codes were identified in the WorkPartners database (January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2019). Retrospective analysis was performed on annual prevalence, benefit use, mean days of leave, and median payments as a percent of salary (including lump-sum distributions and potentially extending beyond initiation year). WC claims without work absences were excluded. For each benefit, annual outcomes were calculated as a percent of baseline to show variability. Results Use was 48.1% to 202.2% (median, 102.8%) of baseline rates for SL (SUD-EMPs), and 87.3% to 108.4% (median, 97.3%) for STD (MD-EMPs). Days of LTD leaves were 21.5% to 657.8% (median, 359.2%) of baseline days (MD-EMPs), and 122.7% to 1042.2% (median, 460.0%) of baseline days for (SUD-EMPs). Median payments for WC were 78.6% to 253.6% (median, 114.6%) of baseline (MD-EMPs) and 97.9% to 481.6% (median, 104.0%) for SUD-EMPs. Discussion Employees with MD/SUD used absence benefits at differing rates over time with varying days of leave and payments as a percent of salary. Using a constant cost or salary replacement factor over time for all benefits is not accurate or appropriate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Mental Health Clinician\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"279-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/c0/i2168-9709-11-5-279.PMC8463001.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Mental Health Clinician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2021.09.279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mental Health Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2021.09.279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:美国员工缺职福利可能包括工伤/疾病的工人补偿(WC),非工伤/疾病的短期和长期残疾(分别为STD和LTD),以及酌情病假(SL)。缺勤会严重影响业务绩效,雇主正在加大力度管理福利以及与员工健康的联系。本研究比较了患有精神障碍(MDs)和sud的合格员工(EMPs)的全因性病/LTD/WC/SL使用情况及其与基线(2002年)的变化,以确定使用/支付是否随时间而变化。方法:在WorkPartners数据库(2002年1月1日至2019年12月31日)中识别医疗保健研究与质量机构MD和SUD ICD-9/10代码的医疗索赔员工。回顾性分析了年度患病率、福利使用、平均休假天数和工资的中位数百分比(包括一次性分配和可能超过入职年度)。没有工作缺勤的WC索赔被排除在外。对于每一项福利,年度结果以基线的百分比计算,以显示可变性。结果:SL (sd - emps)的基线使用率为48.1%至202.2%(中位数,102.8%),STD (MD-EMPs)的基线使用率为87.3%至108.4%(中位数,97.3%)。LTD休假天数为基线天数(MD-EMPs)的21.5%至657.8%(中位数,359.2%),为基线天数(sd - emps)的122.7%至1042.2%(中位数,460.0%)。WC的支付中位数为基线(MD-EMPs)的78.6%至253.6%(中位数为114.6%),而SUD-EMPs的支付中位数为97.9%至481.6%(中位数为104.0%)。讨论:患有MD/SUD的员工使用缺勤福利的时间不同,休假天数不同,工资占工资的百分比不同。对所有福利使用固定成本或工资替代系数是不准确或不合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Disability and workers' compensation trends for employees with mental disorders and SUDs in the United States.

Disability and workers' compensation trends for employees with mental disorders and SUDs in the United States.

Disability and workers' compensation trends for employees with mental disorders and SUDs in the United States.

Disability and workers' compensation trends for employees with mental disorders and SUDs in the United States.
Introduction US employee absence benefits may include workers' compensation (WC) for work-related injuries/illnesses, short- and long-term disability (STD and LTD, respectively) for non–work-related injuries/illnesses, and discretionary sick leave (SL). Absences can significantly impact business performance, and employers are intensifying efforts to manage benefits and connections with employee health. This research compares all-cause STD/LTD/WC/SL use and variation from baseline (2002) for eligible employees (EMPs) with mental disorders (MDs) and SUDs to determine if use/payments varied over time. Methods Employees incurring medical claims with Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality MD and SUD ICD-9/10 codes were identified in the WorkPartners database (January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2019). Retrospective analysis was performed on annual prevalence, benefit use, mean days of leave, and median payments as a percent of salary (including lump-sum distributions and potentially extending beyond initiation year). WC claims without work absences were excluded. For each benefit, annual outcomes were calculated as a percent of baseline to show variability. Results Use was 48.1% to 202.2% (median, 102.8%) of baseline rates for SL (SUD-EMPs), and 87.3% to 108.4% (median, 97.3%) for STD (MD-EMPs). Days of LTD leaves were 21.5% to 657.8% (median, 359.2%) of baseline days (MD-EMPs), and 122.7% to 1042.2% (median, 460.0%) of baseline days for (SUD-EMPs). Median payments for WC were 78.6% to 253.6% (median, 114.6%) of baseline (MD-EMPs) and 97.9% to 481.6% (median, 104.0%) for SUD-EMPs. Discussion Employees with MD/SUD used absence benefits at differing rates over time with varying days of leave and payments as a percent of salary. Using a constant cost or salary replacement factor over time for all benefits is not accurate or appropriate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信