生物制剂和口服小分子治疗特应性皮炎的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of Dermatological Treatment Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-08 DOI:10.1080/09546634.2021.1986204
Kelsey B Nusbaum, Sarah Fleischer, Alan B Fleischer
{"title":"生物制剂和口服小分子治疗特应性皮炎的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kelsey B Nusbaum,&nbsp;Sarah Fleischer,&nbsp;Alan B Fleischer","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2021.1986204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As new targeted therapies continue to emerge for atopic dermatitis (AD), comparisons between agents are necessary to inform clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the efficacy of biologics and oral small molecules on the clinical signs, symptoms, and quality of life in AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review identified phase II and III randomized clinical trials of biologics and oral small molecules in AD. Clinical benefit was assessed for three outcome measures: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) by performing a meta-analysis using the inverse variance heterogeneity model ((IVhet)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest achievement of 75% reduction in EASI was seen with the higher dose of upadacitinib (30 mg) followed by abrocitinib and lebrikizumab, which outperformed dupilumab. Similarly, the highest proportion achieving at least a 4-point reduction of PP-NRS was seen with lebrikizumab followed by upadacitinib and abrocitinib which had greater reduction of itch than dupilumab. Abrocitinib had the greatest improvement in DLQI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Upadacitinib, abrocitinib, and lebrikizumab had greater improvement of clinical signs, symptoms, and quality of life in AD compared to dupilumab and other targeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"2534-2544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of biologics and oral small molecules for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey B Nusbaum,&nbsp;Sarah Fleischer,&nbsp;Alan B Fleischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2021.1986204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As new targeted therapies continue to emerge for atopic dermatitis (AD), comparisons between agents are necessary to inform clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the efficacy of biologics and oral small molecules on the clinical signs, symptoms, and quality of life in AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review identified phase II and III randomized clinical trials of biologics and oral small molecules in AD. Clinical benefit was assessed for three outcome measures: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) by performing a meta-analysis using the inverse variance heterogeneity model ((IVhet)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest achievement of 75% reduction in EASI was seen with the higher dose of upadacitinib (30 mg) followed by abrocitinib and lebrikizumab, which outperformed dupilumab. Similarly, the highest proportion achieving at least a 4-point reduction of PP-NRS was seen with lebrikizumab followed by upadacitinib and abrocitinib which had greater reduction of itch than dupilumab. Abrocitinib had the greatest improvement in DLQI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Upadacitinib, abrocitinib, and lebrikizumab had greater improvement of clinical signs, symptoms, and quality of life in AD compared to dupilumab and other targeted therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2534-2544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2021.1986204\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2021.1986204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:随着特应性皮炎(AD)新的靶向治疗方法的不断出现,药物之间的比较是必要的,为临床决策提供信息。目的:评估生物制剂和口服小分子药物对阿尔茨海默病临床体征、症状和生活质量的影响。方法:系统的文献回顾了生物制剂和口服小分子治疗AD的II期和III期随机临床试验。通过使用逆方差异质性模型(IVhet)进行荟萃分析,对三个结局指标进行临床获益评估:湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)、皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和瘙痒峰值数值评定量表(PP-NRS)。结果:EASI降低75%的最高成就是upadacitinib (30mg)的高剂量,其次是abrocitinib和lebrikizumab,优于dupilumab。同样,实现至少4点PP-NRS降低的比例最高的是来布单抗,其次是upadacitinib和abrocitinib,它们比dupilumab具有更大的瘙痒减少。阿布奇替尼对DLQI的改善最大。结论:与dupilumab和其他靶向治疗相比,Upadacitinib、abrocitinib和lebrikizumab在AD的临床体征、症状和生活质量方面有更大的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of biologics and oral small molecules for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: As new targeted therapies continue to emerge for atopic dermatitis (AD), comparisons between agents are necessary to inform clinical decision-making.

Objectives: Assess the efficacy of biologics and oral small molecules on the clinical signs, symptoms, and quality of life in AD.

Methods: A systematic literature review identified phase II and III randomized clinical trials of biologics and oral small molecules in AD. Clinical benefit was assessed for three outcome measures: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) by performing a meta-analysis using the inverse variance heterogeneity model ((IVhet)).

Results: The highest achievement of 75% reduction in EASI was seen with the higher dose of upadacitinib (30 mg) followed by abrocitinib and lebrikizumab, which outperformed dupilumab. Similarly, the highest proportion achieving at least a 4-point reduction of PP-NRS was seen with lebrikizumab followed by upadacitinib and abrocitinib which had greater reduction of itch than dupilumab. Abrocitinib had the greatest improvement in DLQI.

Conclusions: Upadacitinib, abrocitinib, and lebrikizumab had greater improvement of clinical signs, symptoms, and quality of life in AD compared to dupilumab and other targeted therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatological Treatment covers all aspects of the treatment of skin disease, including the use of topical and systematically administered drugs and other forms of therapy. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is positioned to give dermatologists cutting edge information on new treatments in all areas of dermatology. It also publishes valuable clinical reviews and theoretical papers on dermatological treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信