用描述性和模拟经验风险形式教育药剂师强阿片类药物的风险:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.7
MDM policy & practice Pub Date : 2021-09-27 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683211042832
Odette Wegwarth, Stefan Wind, Eva Goebel, Claudia Spies, Joerg J Meerpohl, Christine Schmucker, Erika Schulte, Edmund Neugebauer, Ralph Hertwig
{"title":"用描述性和模拟经验风险形式教育药剂师强阿片类药物的风险:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Odette Wegwarth,&nbsp;Stefan Wind,&nbsp;Eva Goebel,&nbsp;Claudia Spies,&nbsp;Joerg J Meerpohl,&nbsp;Christine Schmucker,&nbsp;Erika Schulte,&nbsp;Edmund Neugebauer,&nbsp;Ralph Hertwig","doi":"10.1177/23814683211042832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives.</b> High opioid prescription rates in the United States and Europe suggest miscalibrated risk perceptions among those who prescribe, dispense, and take opioids. Findings from cognitive decision science suggest that risk perceptions and behaviors can differ depending on whether people learn about risks by experience or description. This study investigated effects of a descriptive versus an experience-based risk education format on pharmacists' risk perceptions and counseling behavior in the long-term administration of strong opioids to patients with chronic noncancer pain. <b>Methods.</b> In an exploratory, randomized controlled online trial, 300 German pharmacists were randomly assigned to either a descriptive format (fact box) or a simulated experience format (interactive simulation). <b>Primary Outcome Measures.</b> 1) Objective risk perception, 2) subjective risk perception, and 3) intended and 4) actual counseling behavior. <b>Results.</b> Both risk formats significantly improved pharmacists' objective risk perception, but pharmacists exposed to the fact box estimated the benefit-harm ratio more accurately than those exposed to the simulation. Both formats proved equally effective in adjusting pharmacists' subjective risk perception toward a better recognition of opioids' harms; however, pharmacists receiving the simulation showed a greater change in their actual counseling behavior and higher consistency between their intended and actual counseling than pharmacists receiving the fact box. <b>Conclusion.</b> The simulated experience format was less effective than the descriptive format in improving pharmacists' objective risk perception, equally effective in motivating pharmacists to counsel patients on less risky treatment alternatives and more effective in changing the reported actual counseling behavior. <b>Implications.</b> These exploratory findings provide important insights into the relevance of the description-experience gap for drug safety and raise questions for future research regarding the specific mechanisms at work.</p>","PeriodicalId":520707,"journal":{"name":"MDM policy & practice","volume":" ","pages":"23814683211042832"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482350/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educating Pharmacists on the Risks of Strong Opioids With Descriptive and Simulated Experience Risk Formats: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Odette Wegwarth,&nbsp;Stefan Wind,&nbsp;Eva Goebel,&nbsp;Claudia Spies,&nbsp;Joerg J Meerpohl,&nbsp;Christine Schmucker,&nbsp;Erika Schulte,&nbsp;Edmund Neugebauer,&nbsp;Ralph Hertwig\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23814683211042832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives.</b> High opioid prescription rates in the United States and Europe suggest miscalibrated risk perceptions among those who prescribe, dispense, and take opioids. Findings from cognitive decision science suggest that risk perceptions and behaviors can differ depending on whether people learn about risks by experience or description. This study investigated effects of a descriptive versus an experience-based risk education format on pharmacists' risk perceptions and counseling behavior in the long-term administration of strong opioids to patients with chronic noncancer pain. <b>Methods.</b> In an exploratory, randomized controlled online trial, 300 German pharmacists were randomly assigned to either a descriptive format (fact box) or a simulated experience format (interactive simulation). <b>Primary Outcome Measures.</b> 1) Objective risk perception, 2) subjective risk perception, and 3) intended and 4) actual counseling behavior. <b>Results.</b> Both risk formats significantly improved pharmacists' objective risk perception, but pharmacists exposed to the fact box estimated the benefit-harm ratio more accurately than those exposed to the simulation. Both formats proved equally effective in adjusting pharmacists' subjective risk perception toward a better recognition of opioids' harms; however, pharmacists receiving the simulation showed a greater change in their actual counseling behavior and higher consistency between their intended and actual counseling than pharmacists receiving the fact box. <b>Conclusion.</b> The simulated experience format was less effective than the descriptive format in improving pharmacists' objective risk perception, equally effective in motivating pharmacists to counsel patients on less risky treatment alternatives and more effective in changing the reported actual counseling behavior. <b>Implications.</b> These exploratory findings provide important insights into the relevance of the description-experience gap for drug safety and raise questions for future research regarding the specific mechanisms at work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MDM policy & practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23814683211042832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8482350/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MDM policy & practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211042832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM policy & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211042832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目标。美国和欧洲的高阿片类药物处方率表明,处方、分发和服用阿片类药物的人对风险的认知存在偏差。认知决策科学的研究结果表明,风险感知和行为可能会因人们是通过经验还是描述来了解风险而有所不同。本研究调查了描述性和基于经验的风险教育形式对药剂师对慢性非癌性疼痛患者长期服用强阿片类药物的风险认知和咨询行为的影响。方法。在一项探索性、随机对照的在线试验中,300名德国药剂师被随机分配到描述性格式(事实框)或模拟体验格式(交互式模拟)。主要结局指标:1)客观风险感知,2)主观风险感知,3)预期和4)实际咨询行为。结果。两种风险形式都显著提高了药师的客观风险感知,但事实框下的药师比模拟情境下的药师更准确地估计了利害比。事实证明,这两种形式在调整药剂师的主观风险感知以更好地认识阿片类药物的危害方面同样有效;然而,与接受事实盒的药剂师相比,接受模拟的药剂师的实际咨询行为发生了更大的变化,他们的预期咨询与实际咨询的一致性更高。结论。模拟体验格式在提高药师的客观风险感知方面不如描述性格式有效,在激励药师向患者咨询风险较小的治疗方案方面同样有效,在改变报告的实际咨询行为方面更有效。的影响。这些探索性发现为药物安全的描述-经验差距的相关性提供了重要的见解,并为未来的研究提出了有关具体工作机制的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Educating Pharmacists on the Risks of Strong Opioids With Descriptive and Simulated Experience Risk Formats: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Educating Pharmacists on the Risks of Strong Opioids With Descriptive and Simulated Experience Risk Formats: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Educating Pharmacists on the Risks of Strong Opioids With Descriptive and Simulated Experience Risk Formats: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Educating Pharmacists on the Risks of Strong Opioids With Descriptive and Simulated Experience Risk Formats: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objectives. High opioid prescription rates in the United States and Europe suggest miscalibrated risk perceptions among those who prescribe, dispense, and take opioids. Findings from cognitive decision science suggest that risk perceptions and behaviors can differ depending on whether people learn about risks by experience or description. This study investigated effects of a descriptive versus an experience-based risk education format on pharmacists' risk perceptions and counseling behavior in the long-term administration of strong opioids to patients with chronic noncancer pain. Methods. In an exploratory, randomized controlled online trial, 300 German pharmacists were randomly assigned to either a descriptive format (fact box) or a simulated experience format (interactive simulation). Primary Outcome Measures. 1) Objective risk perception, 2) subjective risk perception, and 3) intended and 4) actual counseling behavior. Results. Both risk formats significantly improved pharmacists' objective risk perception, but pharmacists exposed to the fact box estimated the benefit-harm ratio more accurately than those exposed to the simulation. Both formats proved equally effective in adjusting pharmacists' subjective risk perception toward a better recognition of opioids' harms; however, pharmacists receiving the simulation showed a greater change in their actual counseling behavior and higher consistency between their intended and actual counseling than pharmacists receiving the fact box. Conclusion. The simulated experience format was less effective than the descriptive format in improving pharmacists' objective risk perception, equally effective in motivating pharmacists to counsel patients on less risky treatment alternatives and more effective in changing the reported actual counseling behavior. Implications. These exploratory findings provide important insights into the relevance of the description-experience gap for drug safety and raise questions for future research regarding the specific mechanisms at work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信