血浆ctDNA RAS状态选择转移性结直肠癌患者进行抗egfr治疗:一项荟萃分析。

Q3 Medicine
M S Vlachou, D Mauri, G Zarkavelis, P Ntellas, C Tagkas, S Gkoura, G Pentheroudakis
{"title":"血浆ctDNA RAS状态选择转移性结直肠癌患者进行抗egfr治疗:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"M S Vlachou,&nbsp;D Mauri,&nbsp;G Zarkavelis,&nbsp;P Ntellas,&nbsp;C Tagkas,&nbsp;S Gkoura,&nbsp;G Pentheroudakis","doi":"10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-43-no-3.16592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently one randomized trial and several phase II studies underscored that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after an initial clinical benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment may further benefit from rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy. Testing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS status prior to anti-EGFR rechallenge seems a promising non-invasive method to predict and monitor response to anti-EGFR readministration.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the capability of liquid biopsy ctDNA in exploring RAS status and in predicting outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody rechallenge.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Systematic review of literature and meta-analysis of the available evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from four studies involving 117 patients were available. All patients harbored RAS wild type tumors and derived benefit from first line anti-EGFR therapy. Of these, 65 underwent plasma ctDNA before anti-EGFR treatment rechallenge and were eligible for analyses: 35 patients had RAS wild type ctDNA, and 30 RAS mutated, indicating that 46% of patients underwent RAS status conversion after primary anti-EGFR therapy. Anti-EGFR rechallenge among patients with plasma ctDNA RAS wild type status was associated with a consistent benefit in progression free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.70; p = 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0) and overall survival (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.85; p = 0.02; I<sup>2</sup> = 74%) when compared to its use among patients with plasma ctDNA RAS mutation. Patients with plasma ctDNA RAS wild type profile also performed statistically better in term of disease control rate, risk for disease progression at 3 and 6 months, and risk for death at 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAS status assessment continues to be useful in predicting benefit for anti-EGFR treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12287,"journal":{"name":"Experimental oncology","volume":"43 3","pages":"252-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma ctDNA RAS status selects patients for anti-EGFR treatment rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M S Vlachou,&nbsp;D Mauri,&nbsp;G Zarkavelis,&nbsp;P Ntellas,&nbsp;C Tagkas,&nbsp;S Gkoura,&nbsp;G Pentheroudakis\",\"doi\":\"10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-43-no-3.16592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently one randomized trial and several phase II studies underscored that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after an initial clinical benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment may further benefit from rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy. Testing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS status prior to anti-EGFR rechallenge seems a promising non-invasive method to predict and monitor response to anti-EGFR readministration.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the capability of liquid biopsy ctDNA in exploring RAS status and in predicting outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody rechallenge.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Systematic review of literature and meta-analysis of the available evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from four studies involving 117 patients were available. All patients harbored RAS wild type tumors and derived benefit from first line anti-EGFR therapy. Of these, 65 underwent plasma ctDNA before anti-EGFR treatment rechallenge and were eligible for analyses: 35 patients had RAS wild type ctDNA, and 30 RAS mutated, indicating that 46% of patients underwent RAS status conversion after primary anti-EGFR therapy. Anti-EGFR rechallenge among patients with plasma ctDNA RAS wild type status was associated with a consistent benefit in progression free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.70; p = 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0) and overall survival (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.85; p = 0.02; I<sup>2</sup> = 74%) when compared to its use among patients with plasma ctDNA RAS mutation. Patients with plasma ctDNA RAS wild type profile also performed statistically better in term of disease control rate, risk for disease progression at 3 and 6 months, and risk for death at 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAS status assessment continues to be useful in predicting benefit for anti-EGFR treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental oncology\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"252-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-43-no-3.16592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-43-no-3.16592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:最近一项随机试验和几项II期研究强调,在抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)治疗获得初步临床获益后进展的转移性结直肠癌患者可能进一步从抗表皮生长因子受体治疗中获益。在抗egfr再挑战之前检测循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA) RAS状态似乎是预测和监测抗egfr再给药反应的一种有前途的非侵入性方法。目的:探讨液体活检ctDNA对转移性结直肠癌患者经抗egfr单克隆抗体再激治疗后RAS状态及预后的预测作用。材料和方法:系统回顾文献和对现有证据的荟萃分析。结果:有4项研究的数据,涉及117例患者。所有患者都患有RAS野生型肿瘤,并从一线抗egfr治疗中获益。其中,65例患者在抗egfr治疗前接受了血浆ctDNA检测,符合分析条件:35例患者有RAS野生型ctDNA, 30例RAS突变,表明46%的患者在首次抗egfr治疗后发生了RAS状态转换。血浆ctDNA RAS野生型状态患者的抗egfr再挑战与无进展生存期的一致获益相关(风险比(HR) 0.40, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.22-0.70;P = 0.001;I2 = 0)和总生存率(HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.85;P = 0.02;I2 = 74%),与血浆ctDNA RAS突变患者进行比较。血浆ctDNA RAS野生型患者在疾病控制率、3个月和6个月疾病进展风险以及6个月和12个月死亡风险方面也有统计学上更好的表现。结论:RAS状态评估仍可用于预测抗egfr治疗的获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plasma ctDNA RAS status selects patients for anti-EGFR treatment rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Background: Recently one randomized trial and several phase II studies underscored that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after an initial clinical benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment may further benefit from rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy. Testing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS status prior to anti-EGFR rechallenge seems a promising non-invasive method to predict and monitor response to anti-EGFR readministration.

Aim: To assess the capability of liquid biopsy ctDNA in exploring RAS status and in predicting outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody rechallenge.

Materials and methods: Systematic review of literature and meta-analysis of the available evidence.

Results: Data from four studies involving 117 patients were available. All patients harbored RAS wild type tumors and derived benefit from first line anti-EGFR therapy. Of these, 65 underwent plasma ctDNA before anti-EGFR treatment rechallenge and were eligible for analyses: 35 patients had RAS wild type ctDNA, and 30 RAS mutated, indicating that 46% of patients underwent RAS status conversion after primary anti-EGFR therapy. Anti-EGFR rechallenge among patients with plasma ctDNA RAS wild type status was associated with a consistent benefit in progression free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.70; p = 0.001; I2 = 0) and overall survival (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.85; p = 0.02; I2 = 74%) when compared to its use among patients with plasma ctDNA RAS mutation. Patients with plasma ctDNA RAS wild type profile also performed statistically better in term of disease control rate, risk for disease progression at 3 and 6 months, and risk for death at 6 and 12 months.

Conclusion: RAS status assessment continues to be useful in predicting benefit for anti-EGFR treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental oncology
Experimental oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Experimental Oncology is an English-language journal that publishes review articles, original contributions, short communications, case reports and technical advances presenting new data in the field of experimental and fundamental oncology. Manuscripts should be written in English, contain original work, which has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. It also implies the transfer of the Copyright from the author to “Experimental Oncology”. No part of journal publications may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission of the publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信