IMGC和NBS固体密度标准的比较。

Anna Peuto, Richard S Davis
{"title":"IMGC和NBS固体密度标准的比较。","authors":"Anna Peuto,&nbsp;Richard S Davis","doi":"10.6028/jres.090.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solid-object density standards developed independently by the Istituto di Metrologia \"G. Colonnetti\" (IMGC) and NBS, and traceable to SI units of length and mass, have been compared using a silicon transfer standard. Results agree to approximately 1×10<sup>-6</sup>, which is conistent with the uncertainties assigned by the two laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":93321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)","volume":"90 3","pages":"217-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692276/pdf/jres-90-217.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Solid Density Standards Between IMGC and NBS.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Peuto,&nbsp;Richard S Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.6028/jres.090.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Solid-object density standards developed independently by the Istituto di Metrologia \\\"G. Colonnetti\\\" (IMGC) and NBS, and traceable to SI units of length and mass, have been compared using a silicon transfer standard. Results agree to approximately 1×10<sup>-6</sup>, which is conistent with the uncertainties assigned by the two laboratories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)\",\"volume\":\"90 3\",\"pages\":\"217-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692276/pdf/jres-90-217.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.090.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.090.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

由计量研究所“G.Colonetti”(IMGC)和NBS独立开发的固体物体密度标准,可追溯到长度和质量的SI单位,已使用硅转移标准进行了比较。结果约为1×10-6,这与两个实验室分配的不确定性是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Solid Density Standards Between IMGC and NBS.

Solid-object density standards developed independently by the Istituto di Metrologia "G. Colonnetti" (IMGC) and NBS, and traceable to SI units of length and mass, have been compared using a silicon transfer standard. Results agree to approximately 1×10-6, which is conistent with the uncertainties assigned by the two laboratories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信