A Langenbruch, N Mohr, F Abeck, J Schmitt, S Ständer, T Werfel, D Thaçi, S Weidinger, M Augustin
{"title":"【德国特应性皮炎患者的护理质量——十年后各项指标没有改善】。","authors":"A Langenbruch, N Mohr, F Abeck, J Schmitt, S Ständer, T Werfel, D Thaçi, S Weidinger, M Augustin","doi":"10.1007/s00105-021-04885-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With AtopicHealth1, the first national care study on atopic dermatitis (AD) was conducted in 2010. At that time, about one third of the patients undergoing treatment by dermatologists showed severe limitations in quality of life, which indicated an insufficient quality of care. The aim of the present study was to characterise the current care of patients with AD undergoing dermatological treatment in comparison between different severity grades, as well as in comparison to 2010 and to psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Germany-wide multicentre cross-sectional study \"AtopicHealth2\" recorded clinical data, quality of life (DLQI), therapies, preventive behaviour and patient-defined treatment benefit (PBI). Patients with an indication for systemic therapy were considered moderately to severely affected for subgroup analyses, the others mildly affected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2017 and 2019, 1291 patients (median age 41 years, 56.5% female) were enrolled by 111 centres. Compared with 2010, there were no improvements in quality of life (DLQI 8.5 in both studies), severity (SCORAD 45.4 vs. 42.3 in 2010) or treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.4 in 2010). Moderately to severely affected patients were more likely to show impaired quality of life (45.4% vs. 23.6%) and less likely to have relevant treatment benefits (PBI < 1: 21.3% vs. 13.2%) than mildly affected patients. In contrast to psoriasis, patients with AD revealed higher quality of life limitations (DLQI 8.5 vs. 6.1) and lower treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.8).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Compared to 2010, there is no improvement in the quality of care for AD in Germany. Compared to psoriasis, patients with AD show higher burden and lower treatment benefit, which underlines the need for therapeutic innovations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12970,"journal":{"name":"Hautarzt","volume":"72 12","pages":"1079-1089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613161/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Quality of care for patients with atopic dermatitis in Germany-no improvements in indicators after ten years].\",\"authors\":\"A Langenbruch, N Mohr, F Abeck, J Schmitt, S Ständer, T Werfel, D Thaçi, S Weidinger, M Augustin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00105-021-04885-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With AtopicHealth1, the first national care study on atopic dermatitis (AD) was conducted in 2010. At that time, about one third of the patients undergoing treatment by dermatologists showed severe limitations in quality of life, which indicated an insufficient quality of care. The aim of the present study was to characterise the current care of patients with AD undergoing dermatological treatment in comparison between different severity grades, as well as in comparison to 2010 and to psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Germany-wide multicentre cross-sectional study \\\"AtopicHealth2\\\" recorded clinical data, quality of life (DLQI), therapies, preventive behaviour and patient-defined treatment benefit (PBI). Patients with an indication for systemic therapy were considered moderately to severely affected for subgroup analyses, the others mildly affected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2017 and 2019, 1291 patients (median age 41 years, 56.5% female) were enrolled by 111 centres. Compared with 2010, there were no improvements in quality of life (DLQI 8.5 in both studies), severity (SCORAD 45.4 vs. 42.3 in 2010) or treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.4 in 2010). Moderately to severely affected patients were more likely to show impaired quality of life (45.4% vs. 23.6%) and less likely to have relevant treatment benefits (PBI < 1: 21.3% vs. 13.2%) than mildly affected patients. In contrast to psoriasis, patients with AD revealed higher quality of life limitations (DLQI 8.5 vs. 6.1) and lower treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.8).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Compared to 2010, there is no improvement in the quality of care for AD in Germany. Compared to psoriasis, patients with AD show higher burden and lower treatment benefit, which underlines the need for therapeutic innovations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hautarzt\",\"volume\":\"72 12\",\"pages\":\"1079-1089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8613161/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hautarzt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-021-04885-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hautarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-021-04885-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Quality of care for patients with atopic dermatitis in Germany-no improvements in indicators after ten years].
Background: With AtopicHealth1, the first national care study on atopic dermatitis (AD) was conducted in 2010. At that time, about one third of the patients undergoing treatment by dermatologists showed severe limitations in quality of life, which indicated an insufficient quality of care. The aim of the present study was to characterise the current care of patients with AD undergoing dermatological treatment in comparison between different severity grades, as well as in comparison to 2010 and to psoriasis.
Methods: The Germany-wide multicentre cross-sectional study "AtopicHealth2" recorded clinical data, quality of life (DLQI), therapies, preventive behaviour and patient-defined treatment benefit (PBI). Patients with an indication for systemic therapy were considered moderately to severely affected for subgroup analyses, the others mildly affected.
Results: Between 2017 and 2019, 1291 patients (median age 41 years, 56.5% female) were enrolled by 111 centres. Compared with 2010, there were no improvements in quality of life (DLQI 8.5 in both studies), severity (SCORAD 45.4 vs. 42.3 in 2010) or treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.4 in 2010). Moderately to severely affected patients were more likely to show impaired quality of life (45.4% vs. 23.6%) and less likely to have relevant treatment benefits (PBI < 1: 21.3% vs. 13.2%) than mildly affected patients. In contrast to psoriasis, patients with AD revealed higher quality of life limitations (DLQI 8.5 vs. 6.1) and lower treatment benefit (PBI 2.2 vs. 2.8).
Discussion: Compared to 2010, there is no improvement in the quality of care for AD in Germany. Compared to psoriasis, patients with AD show higher burden and lower treatment benefit, which underlines the need for therapeutic innovations.
期刊介绍:
Der Hautarzt is an internationally recognized journal informing all dermatologists working in practical or clinical environments about important developments in the field of dermatology including allergology, venereology and related areas.
Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange.
Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.