与关节炎近端指间关节置换术后再次手术相关的因素:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-09 DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1709088
Bo J W Notermans, Jonathan Lans, Ryan P Ponton, Jesse B Jupiter, Neal C Chen
{"title":"与关节炎近端指间关节置换术后再次手术相关的因素:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Bo J W Notermans, Jonathan Lans, Ryan P Ponton, Jesse B Jupiter, Neal C Chen","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1709088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The rate of reoperation after pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty ranges from 5.9 to 37% and complications such as radiographic loosening, deformity, dislocation, and stiffness are common. Because of the limited amount of knowledge around these problems, we evaluated factors associated with reoperation after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  We retrospectively included all adult patients that underwent primary PIP pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty between 2002 and 2016 at one institutional system. A total of 45 patients, with a mean age of 55 (standard deviation: 14), underwent 66 PIP arthroplasties. To address for within individual correlations, we only included fingers treated at patients' initial surgery ( <i>n</i> = 54) in our statistical analysis. These patients were predominantly diagnosed with noninflammatory arthritis 73% ( <i>n</i> = 33). Arthroplasty was performed upon 10 index, 22 middle, 20 ring, and 2 small fingers. <b>Results</b>  The reoperation rate after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty was 30% over a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range: 8.7-54). Indications for reoperation consisted of subluxation ( <i>n</i> = 6), stiffness ( <i>n</i> = 5), swan-neck deformity ( <i>n</i> = 3), and soft tissue complications ( <i>n</i> = 2). Younger age ( <i>p</i> = 0.025), male sex ( <i>p</i> = 0.017), and noninflammatory arthritis ( <i>p</i> = 0.038) were associated with a higher reoperation rate. <b>Conclusion</b>  In this study, our reoperation rate after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty was 30%. This study suggested that younger patients, males, and patients with noninflammatory arthritis are at higher risk of reoperation. We recommend considering these factors when selecting candidates for pyrocarbon arthroplasty. Future studies should focus on prospectively researching these factors in comparison with other implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"13 3","pages":"132-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440050/pdf/10-1055-s-0040-1709088.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated with Reoperation after Pyrocarbon Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty for the Arthritic Joint: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bo J W Notermans, Jonathan Lans, Ryan P Ponton, Jesse B Jupiter, Neal C Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0040-1709088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The rate of reoperation after pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty ranges from 5.9 to 37% and complications such as radiographic loosening, deformity, dislocation, and stiffness are common. Because of the limited amount of knowledge around these problems, we evaluated factors associated with reoperation after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  We retrospectively included all adult patients that underwent primary PIP pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty between 2002 and 2016 at one institutional system. A total of 45 patients, with a mean age of 55 (standard deviation: 14), underwent 66 PIP arthroplasties. To address for within individual correlations, we only included fingers treated at patients' initial surgery ( <i>n</i> = 54) in our statistical analysis. These patients were predominantly diagnosed with noninflammatory arthritis 73% ( <i>n</i> = 33). Arthroplasty was performed upon 10 index, 22 middle, 20 ring, and 2 small fingers. <b>Results</b>  The reoperation rate after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty was 30% over a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range: 8.7-54). Indications for reoperation consisted of subluxation ( <i>n</i> = 6), stiffness ( <i>n</i> = 5), swan-neck deformity ( <i>n</i> = 3), and soft tissue complications ( <i>n</i> = 2). Younger age ( <i>p</i> = 0.025), male sex ( <i>p</i> = 0.017), and noninflammatory arthritis ( <i>p</i> = 0.038) were associated with a higher reoperation rate. <b>Conclusion</b>  In this study, our reoperation rate after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty was 30%. This study suggested that younger patients, males, and patients with noninflammatory arthritis are at higher risk of reoperation. We recommend considering these factors when selecting candidates for pyrocarbon arthroplasty. Future studies should focus on prospectively researching these factors in comparison with other implants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"132-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440050/pdf/10-1055-s-0040-1709088.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:热碳近端指间关节(PIP)关节成形术后的再手术率从 5.9% 到 37% 不等,放射学松动、畸形、脱位和僵硬等并发症很常见。由于对这些问题的了解有限,我们对焦碳PIP关节置换术后再次手术的相关因素进行了评估。材料和方法 我们回顾性地纳入了 2002 年至 2016 年间在一家机构系统内接受过初级 PIP 热碳植入关节置换术的所有成年患者。共有 45 名患者接受了 66 次 PIP 关节置换术,平均年龄为 55 岁(标准差:14 岁)。为了解决个体内部的相关性问题,我们仅将患者初次手术时接受治疗的手指(n = 54)纳入统计分析。这些患者主要被诊断为非炎症性关节炎,占 73% (33 人)。10 个食指、22 个中指、20 个无名指和 2 个小指接受了关节置换术。结果 在25个月的中位随访期间,热碳PIP关节置换术后的再手术率为30%(四分位间范围:8.7-54)。再手术指征包括半脱位(6 例)、僵硬(5 例)、天鹅颈畸形(3 例)和软组织并发症(2 例)。年轻(P = 0.025)、男性(P = 0.017)和非炎症性关节炎(P = 0.038)与较高的再手术率有关。结论 在本研究中,我们的热碳PIP关节置换术后再手术率为30%。这项研究表明,年轻患者、男性和患有非炎症性关节炎的患者再次手术的风险较高。我们建议在选择接受热碳化关节置换术的患者时考虑这些因素。未来的研究应侧重于将这些因素与其他植入物进行前瞻性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Associated with Reoperation after Pyrocarbon Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty for the Arthritic Joint: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction  The rate of reoperation after pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty ranges from 5.9 to 37% and complications such as radiographic loosening, deformity, dislocation, and stiffness are common. Because of the limited amount of knowledge around these problems, we evaluated factors associated with reoperation after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty. Materials and Methods  We retrospectively included all adult patients that underwent primary PIP pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty between 2002 and 2016 at one institutional system. A total of 45 patients, with a mean age of 55 (standard deviation: 14), underwent 66 PIP arthroplasties. To address for within individual correlations, we only included fingers treated at patients' initial surgery ( n = 54) in our statistical analysis. These patients were predominantly diagnosed with noninflammatory arthritis 73% ( n = 33). Arthroplasty was performed upon 10 index, 22 middle, 20 ring, and 2 small fingers. Results  The reoperation rate after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty was 30% over a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range: 8.7-54). Indications for reoperation consisted of subluxation ( n = 6), stiffness ( n = 5), swan-neck deformity ( n = 3), and soft tissue complications ( n = 2). Younger age ( p = 0.025), male sex ( p = 0.017), and noninflammatory arthritis ( p = 0.038) were associated with a higher reoperation rate. Conclusion  In this study, our reoperation rate after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty was 30%. This study suggested that younger patients, males, and patients with noninflammatory arthritis are at higher risk of reoperation. We recommend considering these factors when selecting candidates for pyrocarbon arthroplasty. Future studies should focus on prospectively researching these factors in comparison with other implants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信