局部治疗炎症后色素沉着:系统回顾。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of Dermatological Treatment Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-27 DOI:10.1080/09546634.2021.1981814
Marcus G Tan, Whan B Kim, Christine E Jo, Karina Nabieva, Carly Kirshen, Arisa E Ortiz
{"title":"局部治疗炎症后色素沉着:系统回顾。","authors":"Marcus G Tan,&nbsp;Whan B Kim,&nbsp;Christine E Jo,&nbsp;Karina Nabieva,&nbsp;Carly Kirshen,&nbsp;Arisa E Ortiz","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2021.1981814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical measures are the mainstay treatment for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). Numerous studies have assessed the efficacy of topical medications for the treatment of PIH, but few have evaluated the quality of evidence supporting these topical therapies. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the evidence of topical treatments for PIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included English-language studies that evaluated topical medications for PIH. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from conception to March 29 2021. We used the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation scale (GRADE) scale to assess quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven of 1,224 studies with 1,853 subjects were included. Topical agents with high-quality studies included retinoids, hydroxy acids, corticosteroids, thiamidol, niacinamide and plant-derived products. Sunscreens with SPF30 or greater was recommended in almost every study. Common side effects included desquamation, burning, stinging, dryness, and pruritus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Retinoids, hydroxy acids and broad-spectrum sunscreen were supported by the greatest number of high-quality studies. Ongoing inflammation may be subtle, especially in darker skin phenotypes. Herein, we proposed an evidence-based algorithm for PIH based on the high-quality studies. There is a need to adopt a validated outcome measure for PIH to better compare efficacy between various treatments in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"2518-2526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical treatment for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Marcus G Tan,&nbsp;Whan B Kim,&nbsp;Christine E Jo,&nbsp;Karina Nabieva,&nbsp;Carly Kirshen,&nbsp;Arisa E Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2021.1981814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical measures are the mainstay treatment for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). Numerous studies have assessed the efficacy of topical medications for the treatment of PIH, but few have evaluated the quality of evidence supporting these topical therapies. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the evidence of topical treatments for PIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included English-language studies that evaluated topical medications for PIH. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from conception to March 29 2021. We used the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation scale (GRADE) scale to assess quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven of 1,224 studies with 1,853 subjects were included. Topical agents with high-quality studies included retinoids, hydroxy acids, corticosteroids, thiamidol, niacinamide and plant-derived products. Sunscreens with SPF30 or greater was recommended in almost every study. Common side effects included desquamation, burning, stinging, dryness, and pruritus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Retinoids, hydroxy acids and broad-spectrum sunscreen were supported by the greatest number of high-quality studies. Ongoing inflammation may be subtle, especially in darker skin phenotypes. Herein, we proposed an evidence-based algorithm for PIH based on the high-quality studies. There is a need to adopt a validated outcome measure for PIH to better compare efficacy between various treatments in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2518-2526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2021.1981814\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2021.1981814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:局部措施是炎症后色素沉着(PIH)的主要治疗方法。许多研究评估了局部药物治疗PIH的疗效,但很少评估支持这些局部治疗的证据的质量。我们进行了一项系统综述来评估局部治疗PIH的证据。方法:我们纳入了评估外用药物治疗PIH的英语研究。我们检索了从受孕到2021年3月29日的PubMed、MEDLINE和EMBASE。我们使用改良的推荐、评估、发展和评价分级量表(GRADE)来评估证据质量。结果:纳入了1224项研究中的47项,共1853名受试者。高质量研究的局部药物包括类维生素a、羟基酸、皮质类固醇、硫胺醇、烟酰胺和植物衍生产品。几乎所有的研究都建议使用SPF30或更高的防晒霜。常见的副作用包括脱屑、灼烧、刺痛、干燥和瘙痒。结论:类维生素a、果酸和广谱防晒霜得到了大量高质量研究的支持。持续的炎症可能是微妙的,特别是在深色皮肤表型中。在此,我们在高质量研究的基础上提出了一种基于证据的PIH算法。在未来的研究中,需要采用一种有效的PIH结果测量方法,以便更好地比较不同治疗方法之间的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topical treatment for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: a systematic review.

Background: Topical measures are the mainstay treatment for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). Numerous studies have assessed the efficacy of topical medications for the treatment of PIH, but few have evaluated the quality of evidence supporting these topical therapies. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the evidence of topical treatments for PIH.

Methods: We included English-language studies that evaluated topical medications for PIH. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from conception to March 29 2021. We used the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation scale (GRADE) scale to assess quality of evidence.

Results: Forty-seven of 1,224 studies with 1,853 subjects were included. Topical agents with high-quality studies included retinoids, hydroxy acids, corticosteroids, thiamidol, niacinamide and plant-derived products. Sunscreens with SPF30 or greater was recommended in almost every study. Common side effects included desquamation, burning, stinging, dryness, and pruritus.

Conclusions: Retinoids, hydroxy acids and broad-spectrum sunscreen were supported by the greatest number of high-quality studies. Ongoing inflammation may be subtle, especially in darker skin phenotypes. Herein, we proposed an evidence-based algorithm for PIH based on the high-quality studies. There is a need to adopt a validated outcome measure for PIH to better compare efficacy between various treatments in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatological Treatment covers all aspects of the treatment of skin disease, including the use of topical and systematically administered drugs and other forms of therapy. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is positioned to give dermatologists cutting edge information on new treatments in all areas of dermatology. It also publishes valuable clinical reviews and theoretical papers on dermatological treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信