Thomas K Mwololo, Benita Olivier, Wallace M Karuguti, Joseph M Matheri
{"title":"肯尼亚运动物理治疗循证实践的态度、观念和障碍。","authors":"Thomas K Mwololo, Benita Olivier, Wallace M Karuguti, Joseph M Matheri","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare practitioners are required to integrate clinical experience with the best research evidence for the benefit of the patient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the attitudes, perceptions and barriers regarding evidence-based practice (EBP) in sports physiotherapy in Kenya.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A quantitative crosssectional study was conducted among licensed physiotherapists in the Republic of Kenya through a self-administered questionnaire. Associations between selected sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, training, experience, specialisation) and attitudes, perceptions and barriers were determined using a Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 55.9% (<i>n</i> = 391) response rate was recorded. A positive attitude towards EBP was reported by 94.6% (<i>n</i> = 370) of the respondents. The most obvious areas of agreement with attitude-and perception-related statements were that 'EBP is important in that patients can receive the best possible treatment' (95.9%; <i>n</i> = 375), and that it is important that 'evidence-based guidelines related to work exist' (84.6%; <i>n</i> = 331). There were no significant associations between the demographic characteristics (gender <i>p</i> = 0.104 [<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 2.638;1]; age <i>p</i> = 0.495 [<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 2.393;3]; training <i>p</i> = 0.590 [<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 4.644;6]; experience <i>p</i> = 0.980 [<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.426;4] and specialisation <i>p</i> = 0.649 [<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup>= 0.207;1]); and attitudes and perceptions regarding EBP. Insufficient time was highlighted by 57.8% (<i>n</i> = 226) of the respondents as one of the 'most important barriers'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although physiotherapists presented with strong positive attitudes towards EBP in sports physiotherapy, barriers were identified which could hinder the implementation of EBP in sports physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Barriers to applying EBP in sports physiotherapy may lead to inferior quality of care for athletes while addressing these barriers is crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"77 1","pages":"1561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424747/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes, perceptions and barriers around evidence-based practice in sports physiotherapy in Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas K Mwololo, Benita Olivier, Wallace M Karuguti, Joseph M Matheri\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare practitioners are required to integrate clinical experience with the best research evidence for the benefit of the patient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the attitudes, perceptions and barriers regarding evidence-based practice (EBP) in sports physiotherapy in Kenya.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A quantitative crosssectional study was conducted among licensed physiotherapists in the Republic of Kenya through a self-administered questionnaire. Associations between selected sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, training, experience, specialisation) and attitudes, perceptions and barriers were determined using a Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 55.9% (<i>n</i> = 391) response rate was recorded. A positive attitude towards EBP was reported by 94.6% (<i>n</i> = 370) of the respondents. The most obvious areas of agreement with attitude-and perception-related statements were that 'EBP is important in that patients can receive the best possible treatment' (95.9%; <i>n</i> = 375), and that it is important that 'evidence-based guidelines related to work exist' (84.6%; <i>n</i> = 331). There were no significant associations between the demographic characteristics (gender <i>p</i> = 0.104 [<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 2.638;1]; age <i>p</i> = 0.495 [<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 2.393;3]; training <i>p</i> = 0.590 [<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 4.644;6]; experience <i>p</i> = 0.980 [<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.426;4] and specialisation <i>p</i> = 0.649 [<i>X</i> <sup>2</sup>= 0.207;1]); and attitudes and perceptions regarding EBP. Insufficient time was highlighted by 57.8% (<i>n</i> = 226) of the respondents as one of the 'most important barriers'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although physiotherapists presented with strong positive attitudes towards EBP in sports physiotherapy, barriers were identified which could hinder the implementation of EBP in sports physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Barriers to applying EBP in sports physiotherapy may lead to inferior quality of care for athletes while addressing these barriers is crucial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"1561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8424747/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Attitudes, perceptions and barriers around evidence-based practice in sports physiotherapy in Kenya.
Background: Healthcare practitioners are required to integrate clinical experience with the best research evidence for the benefit of the patient.
Objective: Determine the attitudes, perceptions and barriers regarding evidence-based practice (EBP) in sports physiotherapy in Kenya.
Method: A quantitative crosssectional study was conducted among licensed physiotherapists in the Republic of Kenya through a self-administered questionnaire. Associations between selected sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, training, experience, specialisation) and attitudes, perceptions and barriers were determined using a Chi-square test.
Results: A 55.9% (n = 391) response rate was recorded. A positive attitude towards EBP was reported by 94.6% (n = 370) of the respondents. The most obvious areas of agreement with attitude-and perception-related statements were that 'EBP is important in that patients can receive the best possible treatment' (95.9%; n = 375), and that it is important that 'evidence-based guidelines related to work exist' (84.6%; n = 331). There were no significant associations between the demographic characteristics (gender p = 0.104 [X2 = 2.638;1]; age p = 0.495 [X2 = 2.393;3]; training p = 0.590 [X2 = 4.644;6]; experience p = 0.980 [X2 = 0.426;4] and specialisation p = 0.649 [X2= 0.207;1]); and attitudes and perceptions regarding EBP. Insufficient time was highlighted by 57.8% (n = 226) of the respondents as one of the 'most important barriers'.
Conclusion: Although physiotherapists presented with strong positive attitudes towards EBP in sports physiotherapy, barriers were identified which could hinder the implementation of EBP in sports physiotherapy.
Clinical implications: Barriers to applying EBP in sports physiotherapy may lead to inferior quality of care for athletes while addressing these barriers is crucial.