2019冠状病毒病疫情的一年:拉丁美洲背景下的古巴和乌拉圭。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Medicc Review Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-22 DOI:10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.13
Luis Carlos Silva-Ayçaguer, Jacqueline Ponzo-Gómez
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病疫情的一年:拉丁美洲背景下的古巴和乌拉圭。","authors":"Luis Carlos Silva-Ayçaguer,&nbsp;Jacqueline Ponzo-Gómez","doi":"10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One year after WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic, we found it useful to carry out a diagnosis of the situation in Latin America.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the prevailing epidemiological panorama in mid-March 2021 in 16 countries in Latin America and the performance, over time, in the two countries with the best responses to their respective epidemics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using morbidity and mortality data, we compared the relative performance of each country under review and identified the two countries with the most successful responses to the pandemic. We used five indicators to analyze the course of each country's performance during the pandemic throughout 2020: prevalence of active cases per million population; cumulative incidence rate in 7 days per 100,000 population; positivity rate over a 7-day period; percentage of recovered patients and crude mortality rate per 1,000,000 population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the performance indicators, Cuba was ranked highest, followed by Uruguay. Although figures remained within acceptable margins, both nations experienced notable setbacks in the first weeks of 2021, especially sharp in Uruguay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Any characterization of the situation is condemned to be short-lived due to the emergence of mutational variants; however, this analysis identified favorable sociodemographic characteristics in both nations, and in their health systems, which may offer possible explanations for the results we obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":49835,"journal":{"name":"Medicc Review","volume":" ","pages":"65-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Year in the COVID-19 Epidemic: Cuba and Uruguay in the Latin American Context.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Carlos Silva-Ayçaguer,&nbsp;Jacqueline Ponzo-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One year after WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic, we found it useful to carry out a diagnosis of the situation in Latin America.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the prevailing epidemiological panorama in mid-March 2021 in 16 countries in Latin America and the performance, over time, in the two countries with the best responses to their respective epidemics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using morbidity and mortality data, we compared the relative performance of each country under review and identified the two countries with the most successful responses to the pandemic. We used five indicators to analyze the course of each country's performance during the pandemic throughout 2020: prevalence of active cases per million population; cumulative incidence rate in 7 days per 100,000 population; positivity rate over a 7-day period; percentage of recovered patients and crude mortality rate per 1,000,000 population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the performance indicators, Cuba was ranked highest, followed by Uruguay. Although figures remained within acceptable margins, both nations experienced notable setbacks in the first weeks of 2021, especially sharp in Uruguay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Any characterization of the situation is condemned to be short-lived due to the emergence of mutational variants; however, this analysis identified favorable sociodemographic characteristics in both nations, and in their health systems, which may offer possible explanations for the results we obtained.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicc Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"65-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicc Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.13\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicc Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

导言:在世卫组织宣布COVID-19大流行一年后,我们发现对拉丁美洲的情况进行诊断是有益的。目的:审查2021年3月中旬拉丁美洲16个国家的流行病学全景,以及对各自流行病采取最佳应对措施的两个国家长期以来的表现。方法:利用发病率和死亡率数据,我们比较了审查中的每个国家的相对表现,并确定了对大流行作出最成功反应的两个国家。我们使用了五个指标来分析每个国家在整个2020年大流行期间的表现历程:每百万人口的活跃病例患病率;每10万人7天累积发病率;7天内的阳性率;康复病人的百分比和每100万人的粗死亡率。结果:从绩效指标来看,古巴排名最高,乌拉圭次之。尽管数据仍在可接受的范围内,但两国在2021年的头几周都经历了明显的挫折,尤其是在乌拉圭。结论:由于突变变异的出现,任何对情况的描述都注定是短暂的;然而,该分析确定了两国及其卫生系统有利的社会人口特征,这可能为我们获得的结果提供可能的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Year in the COVID-19 Epidemic: Cuba and Uruguay in the Latin American Context.

Introduction: One year after WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic, we found it useful to carry out a diagnosis of the situation in Latin America.

Objective: Examine the prevailing epidemiological panorama in mid-March 2021 in 16 countries in Latin America and the performance, over time, in the two countries with the best responses to their respective epidemics.

Methods: Using morbidity and mortality data, we compared the relative performance of each country under review and identified the two countries with the most successful responses to the pandemic. We used five indicators to analyze the course of each country's performance during the pandemic throughout 2020: prevalence of active cases per million population; cumulative incidence rate in 7 days per 100,000 population; positivity rate over a 7-day period; percentage of recovered patients and crude mortality rate per 1,000,000 population.

Results: According to the performance indicators, Cuba was ranked highest, followed by Uruguay. Although figures remained within acceptable margins, both nations experienced notable setbacks in the first weeks of 2021, especially sharp in Uruguay.

Conclusions: Any characterization of the situation is condemned to be short-lived due to the emergence of mutational variants; however, this analysis identified favorable sociodemographic characteristics in both nations, and in their health systems, which may offer possible explanations for the results we obtained.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicc Review
Medicc Review PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Uphold the highest standards of ethics and excellence, publishing open-access articles in English relevant to global health equity that offer the best of medical, population health and social sciences research and perspectives by Cuban and other developing-country professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信