Paulo Maia Araújo , Alzira Nunes , Sofia Torres , Carlos Xavier Resende , Sérgio Machado Leite , Joana Duarte Rodrigues , Sandra Amorim , Elisabete Martins , Manuel Campelo , Maria Júlia Maciel
{"title":"心血管疾病高危患者血脂控制的时间趋势","authors":"Paulo Maia Araújo , Alzira Nunes , Sofia Torres , Carlos Xavier Resende , Sérgio Machado Leite , Joana Duarte Rodrigues , Sandra Amorim , Elisabete Martins , Manuel Campelo , Maria Júlia Maciel","doi":"10.1016/j.repce.2020.10.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Since 2011, the European guidelines have included a specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target, <70 mg/dl, for very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) patients. However, registries have shown unsatisfactory results in obtaining this level of adequate lipid control.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess temporal trends in the use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and attainment of adequate control in very high CVR patients since 2011.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective observational study including very high CVR patients admitted in two periods: the first two years since the 2011 guidelines (2011/2012) and five years later (2016/2017). Lipid values, LLT, clinical variables and adequate lipid control rates were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1314 patients were reviewed (2011/2012: 638; 2016/2017: 676). Overall, 443 patients (33.7%) were not under LLT and only a slight improvement in drug prescription was observed from 2011/2012 to 2016/2017. In LLT users, the proportion of high-intensity LLT increased significantly in the later years (6.4% vs. 24.0%; p<0.001), but this was not associated with adequate lipid control. Overall, mean LDL-C was 95.4±37.2 mg/dl and adequate control was achieved in 320 patients (24.4%), without significant differences between 2011/2012 and 2016/2017 (p=0.282). Independent predictors of adequate control were male gender, older age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, prior acute coronary syndrome, prior stroke and LLT, while stable coronary artery disease was associated with higher risk of failure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Even after the introduction of specific LDL-C targets, these are still not reached in most patients. Over a five-year period, LLT prescription only improved slightly, while adequate lipid control rates remained unchanged.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101121,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)","volume":"40 9","pages":"Pages 641-648"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.repce.2020.10.021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal trends of lipid control in very high cardiovascular risk patients\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Maia Araújo , Alzira Nunes , Sofia Torres , Carlos Xavier Resende , Sérgio Machado Leite , Joana Duarte Rodrigues , Sandra Amorim , Elisabete Martins , Manuel Campelo , Maria Júlia Maciel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.repce.2020.10.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Since 2011, the European guidelines have included a specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target, <70 mg/dl, for very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) patients. However, registries have shown unsatisfactory results in obtaining this level of adequate lipid control.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess temporal trends in the use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and attainment of adequate control in very high CVR patients since 2011.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective observational study including very high CVR patients admitted in two periods: the first two years since the 2011 guidelines (2011/2012) and five years later (2016/2017). Lipid values, LLT, clinical variables and adequate lipid control rates were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1314 patients were reviewed (2011/2012: 638; 2016/2017: 676). Overall, 443 patients (33.7%) were not under LLT and only a slight improvement in drug prescription was observed from 2011/2012 to 2016/2017. In LLT users, the proportion of high-intensity LLT increased significantly in the later years (6.4% vs. 24.0%; p<0.001), but this was not associated with adequate lipid control. Overall, mean LDL-C was 95.4±37.2 mg/dl and adequate control was achieved in 320 patients (24.4%), without significant differences between 2011/2012 and 2016/2017 (p=0.282). Independent predictors of adequate control were male gender, older age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, prior acute coronary syndrome, prior stroke and LLT, while stable coronary artery disease was associated with higher risk of failure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Even after the introduction of specific LDL-C targets, these are still not reached in most patients. Over a five-year period, LLT prescription only improved slightly, while adequate lipid control rates remained unchanged.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"40 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 641-648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.repce.2020.10.021\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2174204921002531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2174204921002531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
自2011年以来,欧洲指南包括了一个特定的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标,70 mg/dl,用于非常高心血管风险(CVR)患者。然而,登记显示,在获得这一水平的充分的脂质控制不满意的结果。目的评估自2011年以来在非常高CVR患者中使用降脂疗法(LLT)和获得充分控制的时间趋势。方法我们进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,包括两个时期入院的非常高CVR患者:2011年指南发布后的前两年(2011/2012)和5年后(2016/2017)。分析脂质值、LLT、临床变量和适当的脂质控制率。结果共纳入1314例患者(2011/2012:638例;2016/2017: 676)。总体而言,443例患者(33.7%)未接受LLT治疗,2011/2012年至2016/2017年期间药物处方仅略有改善。在LLT使用者中,高强度LLT的比例在后期显著增加(6.4% vs. 24.0%;P<0.001),但这与充分的脂质控制无关。总体而言,平均LDL-C为95.4±37.2 mg/dl, 320例患者(24.4%)获得了充分的控制,2011/2012年与2016/2017年之间无显著差异(p=0.282)。充分控制的独立预测因素为男性、年龄较大、糖尿病、慢性肾脏疾病、既往急性冠状动脉综合征、既往卒中和LLT,而稳定的冠状动脉疾病与较高的衰竭风险相关。结论:即使引入了特定的LDL-C指标,大多数患者仍未达到这些指标。在五年期间,LLT处方仅略有改善,而适当的脂质控制率保持不变。
Temporal trends of lipid control in very high cardiovascular risk patients
Introduction
Since 2011, the European guidelines have included a specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target, <70 mg/dl, for very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) patients. However, registries have shown unsatisfactory results in obtaining this level of adequate lipid control.
Objectives
To assess temporal trends in the use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and attainment of adequate control in very high CVR patients since 2011.
Methods
We performed a retrospective observational study including very high CVR patients admitted in two periods: the first two years since the 2011 guidelines (2011/2012) and five years later (2016/2017). Lipid values, LLT, clinical variables and adequate lipid control rates were analyzed.
Results
A total of 1314 patients were reviewed (2011/2012: 638; 2016/2017: 676). Overall, 443 patients (33.7%) were not under LLT and only a slight improvement in drug prescription was observed from 2011/2012 to 2016/2017. In LLT users, the proportion of high-intensity LLT increased significantly in the later years (6.4% vs. 24.0%; p<0.001), but this was not associated with adequate lipid control. Overall, mean LDL-C was 95.4±37.2 mg/dl and adequate control was achieved in 320 patients (24.4%), without significant differences between 2011/2012 and 2016/2017 (p=0.282). Independent predictors of adequate control were male gender, older age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, prior acute coronary syndrome, prior stroke and LLT, while stable coronary artery disease was associated with higher risk of failure.
Conclusion
Even after the introduction of specific LDL-C targets, these are still not reached in most patients. Over a five-year period, LLT prescription only improved slightly, while adequate lipid control rates remained unchanged.