[荷兰目前的医学专家指南有多“防老”?]

Q4 Nursing
Nicky A B de Rooij, Marlies Verhoeff, Rianne Lindeboom, Carolien M J van der Linden, Barbara C van Munster
{"title":"[荷兰目前的医学专家指南有多“防老”?]","authors":"Nicky A B de Rooij,&nbsp;Marlies Verhoeff,&nbsp;Rianne Lindeboom,&nbsp;Carolien M J van der Linden,&nbsp;Barbara C van Munster","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2021.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of multimorbidity increases with age, with over 70% of people aged 75 years and over having three or more chronic conditions, often combined with frailty. In current medical practice, evidence-based medicine with evidence-based guidelines forms the basis for treatment. The aim of this study is to determine the practical applicability of the current medical specialist guidelines for the treatment of the heterogeneous group of older patients. All guidelines from the Dutch guidelines database were examined. Twelve guidelines identified as elderly-specific were compared with the recommendations from the 'methodology for the development of guidelines tailored to the elderly'. In 117 guidelines (54%) general terms such as 'older' or 'elderly' were found. An age limit was mentioned in 26 guidelines (12%). The term 'frailty' was mentioned in 38 guidelines (18%), the term 'comorbidity' in 107 (50%) and cognitive problems in eight (4%). Five age-specific guidelines distinguished frail from non-frail older people. Three guidelines discussed relevant outcome measures for the elderly. The results show that the practical applicability of current guidelines is not optimal for the various groups of older people. In our opinion, the improvement of the guidelines preferably by implementation of the Dutch methodology for senior-proof guidelines is a necessary first step in making the current second-line evidence-based guidelines in the Netherlands usable for the growing group of frail and multimorbid elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"52 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[How \\\"elderly-proof\\\" are the current medical specialist guidelines in the Netherlands?]\",\"authors\":\"Nicky A B de Rooij,&nbsp;Marlies Verhoeff,&nbsp;Rianne Lindeboom,&nbsp;Carolien M J van der Linden,&nbsp;Barbara C van Munster\",\"doi\":\"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2021.02.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prevalence of multimorbidity increases with age, with over 70% of people aged 75 years and over having three or more chronic conditions, often combined with frailty. In current medical practice, evidence-based medicine with evidence-based guidelines forms the basis for treatment. The aim of this study is to determine the practical applicability of the current medical specialist guidelines for the treatment of the heterogeneous group of older patients. All guidelines from the Dutch guidelines database were examined. Twelve guidelines identified as elderly-specific were compared with the recommendations from the 'methodology for the development of guidelines tailored to the elderly'. In 117 guidelines (54%) general terms such as 'older' or 'elderly' were found. An age limit was mentioned in 26 guidelines (12%). The term 'frailty' was mentioned in 38 guidelines (18%), the term 'comorbidity' in 107 (50%) and cognitive problems in eight (4%). Five age-specific guidelines distinguished frail from non-frail older people. Three guidelines discussed relevant outcome measures for the elderly. The results show that the practical applicability of current guidelines is not optimal for the various groups of older people. In our opinion, the improvement of the guidelines preferably by implementation of the Dutch methodology for senior-proof guidelines is a necessary first step in making the current second-line evidence-based guidelines in the Netherlands usable for the growing group of frail and multimorbid elderly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2021.02.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2021.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多病的患病率随着年龄的增长而增加,75岁及以上的人群中有70%以上患有三种或三种以上的慢性疾病,通常伴有虚弱。在目前的医学实践中,循证医学和循证指南构成了治疗的基础。本研究的目的是确定当前医学专家指南的实际适用性,以治疗异质组老年患者。审查了荷兰指南数据库中的所有指南。将确定为针对老年人的12项指导方针与“针对老年人制定指导方针的方法”中的建议进行比较。在117份指南中(54%)发现了“年长”或“老年”等一般术语。26条(12%)指南中提到了年龄限制。38份指南(18%)提到了“虚弱”一词,107份(50%)提到了“共病”一词,8份(4%)提到了认知问题。五项针对特定年龄的指南区分了体弱和非体弱的老年人。三个指南讨论了老年人的相关结果测量。结果表明,现行指南的实际适用性并不适合各种老年人群体。我们认为,最好是通过实施荷兰的高级证据指南方法来改进指南,这是使荷兰目前的二线循证指南适用于日益增多的体弱和多病老年人群体的必要的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[How "elderly-proof" are the current medical specialist guidelines in the Netherlands?]

The prevalence of multimorbidity increases with age, with over 70% of people aged 75 years and over having three or more chronic conditions, often combined with frailty. In current medical practice, evidence-based medicine with evidence-based guidelines forms the basis for treatment. The aim of this study is to determine the practical applicability of the current medical specialist guidelines for the treatment of the heterogeneous group of older patients. All guidelines from the Dutch guidelines database were examined. Twelve guidelines identified as elderly-specific were compared with the recommendations from the 'methodology for the development of guidelines tailored to the elderly'. In 117 guidelines (54%) general terms such as 'older' or 'elderly' were found. An age limit was mentioned in 26 guidelines (12%). The term 'frailty' was mentioned in 38 guidelines (18%), the term 'comorbidity' in 107 (50%) and cognitive problems in eight (4%). Five age-specific guidelines distinguished frail from non-frail older people. Three guidelines discussed relevant outcome measures for the elderly. The results show that the practical applicability of current guidelines is not optimal for the various groups of older people. In our opinion, the improvement of the guidelines preferably by implementation of the Dutch methodology for senior-proof guidelines is a necessary first step in making the current second-line evidence-based guidelines in the Netherlands usable for the growing group of frail and multimorbid elderly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信