肘关节置换术治疗肱骨远端骨折。

Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty Pub Date : 2020-11-23 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2471549220960052
J D Stephens, Brandon Kohrs, Logan Bushnell, Speros Gabriel, H Brent Bamberger
{"title":"肘关节置换术治疗肱骨远端骨折。","authors":"J D Stephens,&nbsp;Brandon Kohrs,&nbsp;Logan Bushnell,&nbsp;Speros Gabriel,&nbsp;H Brent Bamberger","doi":"10.1177/2471549220960052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal humerus fractures not amenable to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) present a unique dilemma, especially for patients that weight bear through assistive devices. The one accepted operative treatment for irreparable distal humerus fractures is total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). However, TEA commonly requires lifetime weight lifting restrictions and has limited long term results. Elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) represents an alternative treatment modality. This study reviews patients treated with EHA permitted to weight bear postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve patients underwent EHA for comminuted distal humerus fractures deemed non-reconstructable by ORIF. Patient survey data was collected retrospectively. All patients were allowed to weight bear as tolerated through the operative extremity. Outcome measures included Patient rated elbow evaluation (PREE), Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and whether revision surgery was required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average MEPS score was 76.1 indicating fair outcomes and the average PREE score was 41. One patient required revision. Average follow up was 44.1 months. Three patients required an assistive device prior to injury.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>EHA serves as a viable option for non-reconstructable distal humerus fractures. EHA does not require a weight lifting restriction, which is a benefit over TEA. Overall, patients reported preserved functional capabilities but did report moderate pain. EHA demonstrated durability, although one patient required revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With growing interest in use of EHA, further studies are required to evaluate EHA as a superior treatment for patients with nonreconstructable traumatic distal humerus fractures; however, this study does support use in elderly patients with intermediate follow up.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2471549220960052","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distal Humerus Fractures Managed With Elbow Hemiarthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"J D Stephens,&nbsp;Brandon Kohrs,&nbsp;Logan Bushnell,&nbsp;Speros Gabriel,&nbsp;H Brent Bamberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2471549220960052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal humerus fractures not amenable to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) present a unique dilemma, especially for patients that weight bear through assistive devices. The one accepted operative treatment for irreparable distal humerus fractures is total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). However, TEA commonly requires lifetime weight lifting restrictions and has limited long term results. Elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) represents an alternative treatment modality. This study reviews patients treated with EHA permitted to weight bear postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve patients underwent EHA for comminuted distal humerus fractures deemed non-reconstructable by ORIF. Patient survey data was collected retrospectively. All patients were allowed to weight bear as tolerated through the operative extremity. Outcome measures included Patient rated elbow evaluation (PREE), Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and whether revision surgery was required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average MEPS score was 76.1 indicating fair outcomes and the average PREE score was 41. One patient required revision. Average follow up was 44.1 months. Three patients required an assistive device prior to injury.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>EHA serves as a viable option for non-reconstructable distal humerus fractures. EHA does not require a weight lifting restriction, which is a benefit over TEA. Overall, patients reported preserved functional capabilities but did report moderate pain. EHA demonstrated durability, although one patient required revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With growing interest in use of EHA, further studies are required to evaluate EHA as a superior treatment for patients with nonreconstructable traumatic distal humerus fractures; however, this study does support use in elderly patients with intermediate follow up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2471549220960052\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549220960052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549220960052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:肱骨远端骨折不适合切开复位内固定(ORIF)呈现出独特的困境,特别是对于通过辅助装置负重的患者。对于无法修复的肱骨远端骨折,接受的手术治疗是全肘关节置换术(TEA)。然而,TEA通常需要终生举重限制,长期效果有限。肘关节半置换术(EHA)是另一种治疗方式。本研究回顾了术后允许负重EHA治疗的患者。方法:12例肱骨远端粉碎性骨折经ORIF认为无法重建的患者行EHA治疗。回顾性收集患者调查资料。所有患者均允许在手术肢耐受范围内负重。结果测量包括患者肘关节评分(PREE)、Mayo肘关节表现评分(MEPS)以及是否需要翻修手术。结果:MEPS平均得分为76.1分,表明预后公平;PREE平均得分为41分。一名患者需要复查。平均随访时间为44.1个月。3名患者在受伤前需要使用辅助装置。讨论:EHA是肱骨远端不可重建骨折的可行选择。EHA不需要举重限制,这是优于TEA的一个优点。总体而言,患者报告保留了功能,但确实报告了中度疼痛。EHA表现出持久性,尽管有一名患者需要修改。结论:随着EHA的应用越来越受到关注,需要进一步的研究来评估EHA作为创伤性肱骨远端骨折不可重建患者的优越治疗方法;然而,本研究确实支持在中期随访的老年患者中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Distal Humerus Fractures Managed With Elbow Hemiarthroplasty.

Distal Humerus Fractures Managed With Elbow Hemiarthroplasty.

Distal Humerus Fractures Managed With Elbow Hemiarthroplasty.

Distal Humerus Fractures Managed With Elbow Hemiarthroplasty.

Background: Distal humerus fractures not amenable to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) present a unique dilemma, especially for patients that weight bear through assistive devices. The one accepted operative treatment for irreparable distal humerus fractures is total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). However, TEA commonly requires lifetime weight lifting restrictions and has limited long term results. Elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) represents an alternative treatment modality. This study reviews patients treated with EHA permitted to weight bear postoperatively.

Methods: Twelve patients underwent EHA for comminuted distal humerus fractures deemed non-reconstructable by ORIF. Patient survey data was collected retrospectively. All patients were allowed to weight bear as tolerated through the operative extremity. Outcome measures included Patient rated elbow evaluation (PREE), Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and whether revision surgery was required.

Results: The average MEPS score was 76.1 indicating fair outcomes and the average PREE score was 41. One patient required revision. Average follow up was 44.1 months. Three patients required an assistive device prior to injury.

Discussion: EHA serves as a viable option for non-reconstructable distal humerus fractures. EHA does not require a weight lifting restriction, which is a benefit over TEA. Overall, patients reported preserved functional capabilities but did report moderate pain. EHA demonstrated durability, although one patient required revision.

Conclusion: With growing interest in use of EHA, further studies are required to evaluate EHA as a superior treatment for patients with nonreconstructable traumatic distal humerus fractures; however, this study does support use in elderly patients with intermediate follow up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信