基于标准磁共振成像测量关节盂形状的新方法。

Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty Pub Date : 2020-05-21 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2471549220926826
Nicholas J Maister, Andrew Hely, Liam G Twycross, Stephen D Gill, Richard S Page
{"title":"基于标准磁共振成像测量关节盂形状的新方法。","authors":"Nicholas J Maister,&nbsp;Andrew Hely,&nbsp;Liam G Twycross,&nbsp;Stephen D Gill,&nbsp;Richard S Page","doi":"10.1177/2471549220926826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2471549220926826","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas J Maister,&nbsp;Andrew Hely,&nbsp;Liam G Twycross,&nbsp;Stephen D Gill,&nbsp;Richard S Page\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2471549220926826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2471549220926826\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:测量不同肩关节状况下关节盂形状的最有效方法和方式尚不确定。计算机断层扫描(CT)成像将患者暴露在辐射中,而标准磁共振成像(MRI)不能始终如一地成像整个肩胛骨。本研究探讨了一种使用常规肩部MRI评估关节盂变形的新方法的可靠性。方法:对20例肩关节不稳行关节镜检查的患者的MRI图像,由3名临床医生独立评估骨性和软骨盂关节盂变形。为了评估关节盂形态,从关节盂体内侧角到关节盂面中点画一条线。与此垂直的一条线是测量关节盂形状的参考。3个月后重复测量以评估观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性。采用类内相关系数(ICCs)确定信度。结果:类间相关系数显示,大多数观察者内信度估计(ICC≥0.66)至少具有良好的信度,大多数观察者间信度估计(ICC≥0.84)具有优异的信度,除了一些较差的肩关节测量(ICC≤0.41)。讨论:我们建议这种在标准轴向MRI上测量肩关节的新方法可以作为一种简单、实用和可靠的方法用于肩部不稳定患者,这将减少该组患者对CT的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Background: The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI.

Methods: MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41).

Discussion: We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信