老年人跌倒后重大损伤的危险因素。

Jon D Dorfman, Allison Wyman, Gordon FitzGerald, Timothy A Emhoff, Fred A Anderson, Heena P Santry
{"title":"老年人跌倒后重大损伤的危险因素。","authors":"Jon D Dorfman,&nbsp;Allison Wyman,&nbsp;Gordon FitzGerald,&nbsp;Timothy A Emhoff,&nbsp;Fred A Anderson,&nbsp;Heena P Santry","doi":"10.28933/ijoar-2018-12-2305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elderly falls are a healthcare epidemic. We aimed to identify risk factors of serious falls by linking data on functional status from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) and our institutional trauma registry. 124 of 5,091 local women enrolled in GLOW were evaluated by our trauma team for injuries related to a fall during the study period. Median injury severity score was 9. The most common injuries were intertrochanteric femur fracture (n = 25, 9.8%) and skin contusion/hematoma to face (n = 12, 4.7%). Injured women were older than the uninjured cohort (median 80 versus 68 years), more likely to have cardiovascular disease and osteoarthritis, and less likely to have high cholesterol. Prospectively collected Short Form 36 (SF-36) baseline activity status revealed greater limitation in all assessed activities in women evaluated for fall-related injuries in our trauma center. In multivariable analysis, age (per 10 year increase) and two or more self-reported falls in the baseline survey were the strongest predictors of falling (both HR 2.4, p <0.0001 and p<0.001 respectively), followed by history of osteoarthritis (HR 1.6, p= 0.01). Functional status was no longer associated with risk of fall when adjusting for these factors. Functional status appears to be a surrogate marker for frailty. With the aging of the US population and long lifespan of American women, this finding has important implications for both fall prevention strategies and research intended to better understand why aging women fall as burdensome validated metrics may not be the best indicators of fall risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":93300,"journal":{"name":"International journal of aging research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415806/pdf/nihms-1721572.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risks factors for significant injury after geriatric falls.\",\"authors\":\"Jon D Dorfman,&nbsp;Allison Wyman,&nbsp;Gordon FitzGerald,&nbsp;Timothy A Emhoff,&nbsp;Fred A Anderson,&nbsp;Heena P Santry\",\"doi\":\"10.28933/ijoar-2018-12-2305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Elderly falls are a healthcare epidemic. We aimed to identify risk factors of serious falls by linking data on functional status from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) and our institutional trauma registry. 124 of 5,091 local women enrolled in GLOW were evaluated by our trauma team for injuries related to a fall during the study period. Median injury severity score was 9. The most common injuries were intertrochanteric femur fracture (n = 25, 9.8%) and skin contusion/hematoma to face (n = 12, 4.7%). Injured women were older than the uninjured cohort (median 80 versus 68 years), more likely to have cardiovascular disease and osteoarthritis, and less likely to have high cholesterol. Prospectively collected Short Form 36 (SF-36) baseline activity status revealed greater limitation in all assessed activities in women evaluated for fall-related injuries in our trauma center. In multivariable analysis, age (per 10 year increase) and two or more self-reported falls in the baseline survey were the strongest predictors of falling (both HR 2.4, p <0.0001 and p<0.001 respectively), followed by history of osteoarthritis (HR 1.6, p= 0.01). Functional status was no longer associated with risk of fall when adjusting for these factors. Functional status appears to be a surrogate marker for frailty. With the aging of the US population and long lifespan of American women, this finding has important implications for both fall prevention strategies and research intended to better understand why aging women fall as burdensome validated metrics may not be the best indicators of fall risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of aging research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415806/pdf/nihms-1721572.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of aging research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28933/ijoar-2018-12-2305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of aging research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28933/ijoar-2018-12-2305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年人跌倒是一种医疗流行病。我们的目的是通过连接全球女性骨质疏松症纵向研究(GLOW)和我们的机构创伤登记处的功能状态数据来确定严重跌倒的危险因素。在参加GLOW的5091名当地妇女中,我们的创伤小组对研究期间与跌倒有关的损伤进行了评估。损伤严重程度评分中位数为9分。最常见的损伤是股骨粗隆间骨折(n = 25, 9.8%)和面部皮肤挫伤/血肿(n = 12, 4.7%)。受伤的女性比未受伤的女性年龄更大(中位年龄为80岁对68岁),更容易患心血管疾病和骨关节炎,更不容易患高胆固醇。前瞻性收集的简短表格36 (SF-36)基线活动状态显示,我们创伤中心评估的女性跌倒相关损伤的所有评估活动都有较大的局限性。在多变量分析中,年龄(每10年增加一次)和基线调查中两次或两次以上的自我报告跌倒是最强的跌倒预测因子(HR均为2.4,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Risks factors for significant injury after geriatric falls.

Risks factors for significant injury after geriatric falls.

Risks factors for significant injury after geriatric falls.

Risks factors for significant injury after geriatric falls.

Elderly falls are a healthcare epidemic. We aimed to identify risk factors of serious falls by linking data on functional status from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) and our institutional trauma registry. 124 of 5,091 local women enrolled in GLOW were evaluated by our trauma team for injuries related to a fall during the study period. Median injury severity score was 9. The most common injuries were intertrochanteric femur fracture (n = 25, 9.8%) and skin contusion/hematoma to face (n = 12, 4.7%). Injured women were older than the uninjured cohort (median 80 versus 68 years), more likely to have cardiovascular disease and osteoarthritis, and less likely to have high cholesterol. Prospectively collected Short Form 36 (SF-36) baseline activity status revealed greater limitation in all assessed activities in women evaluated for fall-related injuries in our trauma center. In multivariable analysis, age (per 10 year increase) and two or more self-reported falls in the baseline survey were the strongest predictors of falling (both HR 2.4, p <0.0001 and p<0.001 respectively), followed by history of osteoarthritis (HR 1.6, p= 0.01). Functional status was no longer associated with risk of fall when adjusting for these factors. Functional status appears to be a surrogate marker for frailty. With the aging of the US population and long lifespan of American women, this finding has important implications for both fall prevention strategies and research intended to better understand why aging women fall as burdensome validated metrics may not be the best indicators of fall risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信