长者抑郁/焦虑及任何身体疾病的综合社区合作护理。

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Richard Shulman, Reenu Arora, Rose Geist, Amna Ali, Julia Ma, Elizabeth Mansfield, Sara Martel, Jane Sandercock, Judith Versloot
{"title":"长者抑郁/焦虑及任何身体疾病的综合社区合作护理。","authors":"Richard Shulman,&nbsp;Reenu Arora,&nbsp;Rose Geist,&nbsp;Amna Ali,&nbsp;Julia Ma,&nbsp;Elizabeth Mansfield,&nbsp;Sara Martel,&nbsp;Jane Sandercock,&nbsp;Judith Versloot","doi":"10.5770/cgj.24.473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We report on the feasibility and effectiveness of an integrated community collaborative care model in improving the health of seniors with depression/anxiety symptoms and chronic physical illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This community collaborative care model integrates geriatric medicine and geriatric psychiatry with care managers (CM) providing holistic initial and follow-up assessments, who use standardized rating scales to monitor treatment and provide psychotherapy (ENGAGE). The CM presents cases in a structured case review to a geriatrician and geriatric psychiatrist. Recommendations are communicated by the CM to the patient's primary care provider.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>187 patients were evaluated. The average age was 80 years old. Two-thirds were experiencing moderate-to-severe depression upon entry and this proportion decreased significantly to one-third at completion. Qualitative interviews with patients, family caregivers, team members, and referring physicians indicated that the program was well-received. Patients had on average six visits with the CM without the need to have a face-to-face meeting with a specialist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation shows that the program is feasible and effective as it was well received by patients and patient outcomes improved. Implementation in fee-for-service publicly funded health-care environments may be limited by the need for dedicated funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"24 3","pages":"251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/7e/cgj-24-251.PMC8390319.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated Community Collaborative Care for Seniors with Depression/Anxiety and any Physical Illness.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Shulman,&nbsp;Reenu Arora,&nbsp;Rose Geist,&nbsp;Amna Ali,&nbsp;Julia Ma,&nbsp;Elizabeth Mansfield,&nbsp;Sara Martel,&nbsp;Jane Sandercock,&nbsp;Judith Versloot\",\"doi\":\"10.5770/cgj.24.473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We report on the feasibility and effectiveness of an integrated community collaborative care model in improving the health of seniors with depression/anxiety symptoms and chronic physical illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This community collaborative care model integrates geriatric medicine and geriatric psychiatry with care managers (CM) providing holistic initial and follow-up assessments, who use standardized rating scales to monitor treatment and provide psychotherapy (ENGAGE). The CM presents cases in a structured case review to a geriatrician and geriatric psychiatrist. Recommendations are communicated by the CM to the patient's primary care provider.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>187 patients were evaluated. The average age was 80 years old. Two-thirds were experiencing moderate-to-severe depression upon entry and this proportion decreased significantly to one-third at completion. Qualitative interviews with patients, family caregivers, team members, and referring physicians indicated that the program was well-received. Patients had on average six visits with the CM without the need to have a face-to-face meeting with a specialist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation shows that the program is feasible and effective as it was well received by patients and patient outcomes improved. Implementation in fee-for-service publicly funded health-care environments may be limited by the need for dedicated funding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Geriatrics Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"251-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/7e/cgj-24-251.PMC8390319.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Geriatrics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:我们报告了一种综合社区协作护理模式在改善患有抑郁/焦虑症状和慢性身体疾病的老年人健康方面的可行性和有效性。方法:该社区合作护理模式整合了老年医学和老年精神病学,由护理经理(CM)提供全面的初始和随访评估,他们使用标准化评定量表监测治疗并提供心理治疗(ENGAGE)。CM提出的情况下,在一个结构化的病例审查,以老年病专家和老年精神病学家。建议由CM传达给患者的初级保健提供者。结果:187例患者被评估。平均年龄为80岁。三分之二的人在入职时经历中度至重度抑郁,这一比例在完成时显着下降至三分之一。对患者、家庭护理人员、团队成员和转诊医生的定性访谈表明,该计划受到了很好的欢迎。患者平均六次拜访CM,而不需要与专家面对面会面。结论:评价表明该方案可行有效,患者反应良好,治疗效果得到改善。在公共资助的按服务收费的卫生保健环境中,由于需要专门的资金,实施工作可能受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrated Community Collaborative Care for Seniors with Depression/Anxiety and any Physical Illness.

Background: We report on the feasibility and effectiveness of an integrated community collaborative care model in improving the health of seniors with depression/anxiety symptoms and chronic physical illness.

Methods: This community collaborative care model integrates geriatric medicine and geriatric psychiatry with care managers (CM) providing holistic initial and follow-up assessments, who use standardized rating scales to monitor treatment and provide psychotherapy (ENGAGE). The CM presents cases in a structured case review to a geriatrician and geriatric psychiatrist. Recommendations are communicated by the CM to the patient's primary care provider.

Results: 187 patients were evaluated. The average age was 80 years old. Two-thirds were experiencing moderate-to-severe depression upon entry and this proportion decreased significantly to one-third at completion. Qualitative interviews with patients, family caregivers, team members, and referring physicians indicated that the program was well-received. Patients had on average six visits with the CM without the need to have a face-to-face meeting with a specialist.

Conclusion: The evaluation shows that the program is feasible and effective as it was well received by patients and patient outcomes improved. Implementation in fee-for-service publicly funded health-care environments may be limited by the need for dedicated funding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信