胸腔镜治疗伴或不伴单肺通气犬持续性右主动脉弓。

Veterinary surgery : VS Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-25 DOI:10.1111/vsu.13717
Sarah J Marvel, Ahmed Hafez, Eric Monnet
{"title":"胸腔镜治疗伴或不伴单肺通气犬持续性右主动脉弓。","authors":"Sarah J Marvel,&nbsp;Ahmed Hafez,&nbsp;Eric Monnet","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate thoracoscopic treatment of persistent right aortic arch (PRAA) in dogs with and without the use of one lung ventilation (OLV).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty-two (client-owned and shelter) dogs diagnosed with PRAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records were reviewed retrospectively and intraoperative and immediate postoperative data were compared between dogs that underwent thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA with (OLV+) and without (OLV-) OLV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten of the 12 dogs in the OLV+ group and 7/10 dogs in the OLV- group had their left ligamentum arteriosum successfully ligated during thoracoscopy. Median surgical time, surgery complications, anesthesia complications, and rate of conversion to an open thoracotomy due to limited visualization or surgical complications were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA can be performed with or without OLV. Surgical time, intraoperative complications, and conversion rates were similar between dogs that underwent thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA with and without OLV. OLV may not have contributed to improved visualization in this group of dogs.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance (or impact): </strong>The use of OLV is safe during thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA. OLV did not appear to provide significant benefits in this case series and thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA in dogs may be performed successfully with or without the use of OLV.</p>","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":" ","pages":"O107-O117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/vsu.13717","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracoscopic treatment of persistent right aortic arch in dogs with and without one lung ventilation.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah J Marvel,&nbsp;Ahmed Hafez,&nbsp;Eric Monnet\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.13717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate thoracoscopic treatment of persistent right aortic arch (PRAA) in dogs with and without the use of one lung ventilation (OLV).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty-two (client-owned and shelter) dogs diagnosed with PRAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records were reviewed retrospectively and intraoperative and immediate postoperative data were compared between dogs that underwent thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA with (OLV+) and without (OLV-) OLV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten of the 12 dogs in the OLV+ group and 7/10 dogs in the OLV- group had their left ligamentum arteriosum successfully ligated during thoracoscopy. Median surgical time, surgery complications, anesthesia complications, and rate of conversion to an open thoracotomy due to limited visualization or surgical complications were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA can be performed with or without OLV. Surgical time, intraoperative complications, and conversion rates were similar between dogs that underwent thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA with and without OLV. OLV may not have contributed to improved visualization in this group of dogs.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance (or impact): </strong>The use of OLV is safe during thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA. OLV did not appear to provide significant benefits in this case series and thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA in dogs may be performed successfully with or without the use of OLV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":123280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary surgery : VS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"O107-O117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/vsu.13717\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary surgery : VS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:探讨胸腔镜下单肺通气(OLV)治疗犬持续性右主动脉弓(PRAA)的疗效。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。动物:22只(客户拥有和收容所)被诊断患有PRAA的狗。方法:回顾性回顾医疗记录,比较胸腔镜下(OLV+)和(OLV-) OLV治疗犬PRAA的术中和术后即时数据。结果:12只OLV+组10只、OLV-组7只在胸腔镜下成功结扎左动脉韧带。两组的中位手术时间、手术并发症、麻醉并发症以及由于视野限制或手术并发症而转为开胸手术的比率相似。结论:胸腔镜下治疗PRAA可采用OLV或不采用OLV。手术时间、术中并发症和转换率在接受胸腔镜治疗的狗与不接受OLV的狗之间相似。在这组狗中,OLV可能对视觉的改善没有贡献。临床意义(或影响):在胸腔镜下治疗PRAA时使用OLV是安全的。在这个病例系列中,OLV似乎没有提供显著的益处,在狗的PRAA胸腔镜治疗中,使用或不使用OLV都可能成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoracoscopic treatment of persistent right aortic arch in dogs with and without one lung ventilation.

Objective: To evaluate thoracoscopic treatment of persistent right aortic arch (PRAA) in dogs with and without the use of one lung ventilation (OLV).

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Animals: Twenty-two (client-owned and shelter) dogs diagnosed with PRAA.

Methods: Medical records were reviewed retrospectively and intraoperative and immediate postoperative data were compared between dogs that underwent thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA with (OLV+) and without (OLV-) OLV.

Results: Ten of the 12 dogs in the OLV+ group and 7/10 dogs in the OLV- group had their left ligamentum arteriosum successfully ligated during thoracoscopy. Median surgical time, surgery complications, anesthesia complications, and rate of conversion to an open thoracotomy due to limited visualization or surgical complications were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: Thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA can be performed with or without OLV. Surgical time, intraoperative complications, and conversion rates were similar between dogs that underwent thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA with and without OLV. OLV may not have contributed to improved visualization in this group of dogs.

Clinical significance (or impact): The use of OLV is safe during thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA. OLV did not appear to provide significant benefits in this case series and thoracoscopic treatment of PRAA in dogs may be performed successfully with or without the use of OLV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信