坦桑尼亚塞伦盖蒂生态系统野生动物中的循环布鲁氏菌物种。

R M Sambu, C Mathew, H E Nonga, A S Lukambagire, R B Yapi, J Akoko, G Fokou, J D Keyyu, B Bonfoh, R R Kazwala
{"title":"坦桑尼亚塞伦盖蒂生态系统野生动物中的循环布鲁氏菌物种。","authors":"R M Sambu, C Mathew, H E Nonga, A S Lukambagire, R B Yapi, J Akoko, G Fokou, J D Keyyu, B Bonfoh, R R Kazwala","doi":"10.1186/s42522-021-00047-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brucellosis is a bacterial zoonosis of public health and economic importance worldwide. It affects a number of domestic animals, wild animals and humans. Human brucellosis originates from either livestock or wildlife. The species of Brucella circulating in wild animals in Tanzania is largely unknown due to insufficient surveillance. This study was carried out to identify Brucella species found in selected wildlife hosts in the Serengeti ecosystem.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study used a total of 189 archived samples that were obtained from cross-sectional studies previously conducted between 2000 and 2017 in the Serengeti ecosystem in Tanzania. Whole blood, serum and amniotic fluid collected from buffalos, lions, wildebeest, impala, zebra and hyena were available for DNA extraction. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. ovis and B. suis (AMOS PCR) and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting the bcsp31 and IS711 genes for Brucella genus detection and the IS711 targets alkB for B. abortus and BMEI1162 for B. melitensis were used to detect Brucella strains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 189 samples tested, 12 (6.35 %) and 22 (11.6 %) were positive to AMOS-PCR and qPCR, respectively. Most of the positive samples were from lions (52.6 %) and buffaloes (19.6 %). Other animals that were positive included: wildebeest (13.6 %), impala (13.6 %), zebra (4.5 %) and hyena (4.5 %). Out of 22 positive samples, 16 (66.7 %) were identified as B. abortus and the other six samples did not amplify for neither B. abortus nor B. melitensis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The detection of Brucella DNA in archived wild animal samples shows testing potential of samples collected from this population. The zoonotic species B. abortus and B. melitensis detected in wild animals have previously been reported in livestock and humans in the region. The findings suggest that, due to the contact network, some of the identified wild animal hosts in this study could be reservoirs for infections in domestic animals and humans within the Serengeti ecosystem while others are likely dead-end hosts. One Health control strategies and continuous surveillance programs in other wildlife reserved areas should be implemented to help predicting transmission in livestock and humans in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":19490,"journal":{"name":"One Health Outlook","volume":"3 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circulating Brucella species in wild animals of the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"R M Sambu, C Mathew, H E Nonga, A S Lukambagire, R B Yapi, J Akoko, G Fokou, J D Keyyu, B Bonfoh, R R Kazwala\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42522-021-00047-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brucellosis is a bacterial zoonosis of public health and economic importance worldwide. It affects a number of domestic animals, wild animals and humans. Human brucellosis originates from either livestock or wildlife. The species of Brucella circulating in wild animals in Tanzania is largely unknown due to insufficient surveillance. This study was carried out to identify Brucella species found in selected wildlife hosts in the Serengeti ecosystem.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study used a total of 189 archived samples that were obtained from cross-sectional studies previously conducted between 2000 and 2017 in the Serengeti ecosystem in Tanzania. Whole blood, serum and amniotic fluid collected from buffalos, lions, wildebeest, impala, zebra and hyena were available for DNA extraction. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. ovis and B. suis (AMOS PCR) and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting the bcsp31 and IS711 genes for Brucella genus detection and the IS711 targets alkB for B. abortus and BMEI1162 for B. melitensis were used to detect Brucella strains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 189 samples tested, 12 (6.35 %) and 22 (11.6 %) were positive to AMOS-PCR and qPCR, respectively. Most of the positive samples were from lions (52.6 %) and buffaloes (19.6 %). Other animals that were positive included: wildebeest (13.6 %), impala (13.6 %), zebra (4.5 %) and hyena (4.5 %). Out of 22 positive samples, 16 (66.7 %) were identified as B. abortus and the other six samples did not amplify for neither B. abortus nor B. melitensis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The detection of Brucella DNA in archived wild animal samples shows testing potential of samples collected from this population. The zoonotic species B. abortus and B. melitensis detected in wild animals have previously been reported in livestock and humans in the region. The findings suggest that, due to the contact network, some of the identified wild animal hosts in this study could be reservoirs for infections in domestic animals and humans within the Serengeti ecosystem while others are likely dead-end hosts. One Health control strategies and continuous surveillance programs in other wildlife reserved areas should be implemented to help predicting transmission in livestock and humans in the region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Health Outlook\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Health Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-021-00047-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-021-00047-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:布鲁氏菌病是一种在世界范围内具有公共卫生和经济重要性的细菌性人畜共患疾病。它影响了许多家畜、野生动物和人类。人类布鲁氏菌病源于牲畜或野生动物。由于监测不足,在坦桑尼亚野生动物中传播的布鲁氏菌的种类在很大程度上是未知的。本研究旨在确定在塞伦盖蒂生态系统中选定的野生动物宿主中发现的布鲁氏菌物种。方法:该研究共使用了189个存档样本,这些样本是从2000年至2017年间在坦桑尼亚塞伦盖蒂生态系统进行的横断面研究中获得的。从水牛、狮子、角马、黑斑羚、斑马和鬣狗身上采集的全血、血清和羊水可用于DNA提取。采用流产B.B.melitensis,B.ovis和B.suis的多重聚合酶链式反应(AMOS PCR)和针对bcsp31和IS711基因的定量实时PCR(qPCR)检测布鲁氏菌属,以及针对流产B.alkB和针对B.meliteensis的IS711靶点BMEI1162检测布鲁氏杆菌菌株。结果:在189个测试样本中,12个(6.35 %) 和22(11.6 %) AMOS-PCR和qPCR阳性。大多数阳性样本来自狮子(52.6 %) 和水牛(19.6 %). 其他呈阳性的动物包括:角马(13.6 %), 黑斑羚(13.6 %), 斑马(4.5 %) 和鬣狗(4.5 %). 在22个阳性样本中,16个(66.7 %) 被鉴定为流产B.abortus,而其他六个样品既没有扩增出流产B.aboratus也没有扩增出melitensis。结论:在存档的野生动物样本中检测布鲁氏菌DNA显示了从该种群采集的样本的检测潜力。在野生动物中检测到的人畜共患物种B.abortus和B.melitensis此前曾在该地区的牲畜和人类中报告过。研究结果表明,由于接触网络,本研究中确定的一些野生动物宿主可能是塞伦盖蒂生态系统中家畜和人类感染的宿主,而其他宿主可能是死胡同宿主。应在其他野生动物保护区实施健康控制策略和持续监测计划,以帮助预测该地区牲畜和人类的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Circulating Brucella species in wild animals of the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania.

Circulating Brucella species in wild animals of the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania.

Circulating Brucella species in wild animals of the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania.

Background: Brucellosis is a bacterial zoonosis of public health and economic importance worldwide. It affects a number of domestic animals, wild animals and humans. Human brucellosis originates from either livestock or wildlife. The species of Brucella circulating in wild animals in Tanzania is largely unknown due to insufficient surveillance. This study was carried out to identify Brucella species found in selected wildlife hosts in the Serengeti ecosystem.

Methodology: The study used a total of 189 archived samples that were obtained from cross-sectional studies previously conducted between 2000 and 2017 in the Serengeti ecosystem in Tanzania. Whole blood, serum and amniotic fluid collected from buffalos, lions, wildebeest, impala, zebra and hyena were available for DNA extraction. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. ovis and B. suis (AMOS PCR) and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting the bcsp31 and IS711 genes for Brucella genus detection and the IS711 targets alkB for B. abortus and BMEI1162 for B. melitensis were used to detect Brucella strains.

Results: Out of the 189 samples tested, 12 (6.35 %) and 22 (11.6 %) were positive to AMOS-PCR and qPCR, respectively. Most of the positive samples were from lions (52.6 %) and buffaloes (19.6 %). Other animals that were positive included: wildebeest (13.6 %), impala (13.6 %), zebra (4.5 %) and hyena (4.5 %). Out of 22 positive samples, 16 (66.7 %) were identified as B. abortus and the other six samples did not amplify for neither B. abortus nor B. melitensis.

Conclusions: The detection of Brucella DNA in archived wild animal samples shows testing potential of samples collected from this population. The zoonotic species B. abortus and B. melitensis detected in wild animals have previously been reported in livestock and humans in the region. The findings suggest that, due to the contact network, some of the identified wild animal hosts in this study could be reservoirs for infections in domestic animals and humans within the Serengeti ecosystem while others are likely dead-end hosts. One Health control strategies and continuous surveillance programs in other wildlife reserved areas should be implemented to help predicting transmission in livestock and humans in the region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信