比较多普勒超声心动图和热调节术在接受目标温度管理的昏迷心脏骤停患者中的心输出量测量。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Johannes Grand, Jesper Kjaergaard, Christian Hassager, Jacob Eifer Møller, John Bro-Jeppesen
{"title":"比较多普勒超声心动图和热调节术在接受目标温度管理的昏迷心脏骤停患者中的心输出量测量。","authors":"Johannes Grand,&nbsp;Jesper Kjaergaard,&nbsp;Christian Hassager,&nbsp;Jacob Eifer Møller,&nbsp;John Bro-Jeppesen","doi":"10.1089/ther.2021.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring cardiac output is used to guide treatment during postresuscitation care. The aim of this study was to compare Doppler echocardiography (Doppler-CO) with thermodilution using pulmonary artery catheters (PAC-CO) for cardiac output estimation in a large cohort of comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients undergoing targeted temperature management (TTM). Single-center substudy of 141 patients included in the TTM trial randomly assigned to 33 or 36°C for 24 hours after OHCA. Per protocol, PAC-CO and Doppler-CO were measured simultaneously shortly after admission and again at 24 and 48 hours. Linear correlation was assessed between methods and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Doppler to estimate low cardiac output (<3.5 L/min) was calculated. A total of 301 paired cardiac output measurements were available. Average cardiac output was 5.28 ± 1.94 L/min measured by thermodilution and 4.06 ± 1.49 L/min measured by Doppler with a mean bias of 1.22 L/min (limits of agreements -1.92 to 4.36 L/min). Correlation between methods was moderate (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.36). Using PAC-CO as the gold standard, PPV of a low cardiac output measurement (<3.5 L/min) by Doppler was 33%. However, the NPV was 92%. Hypothermia at 33°C did not negatively affect the correlations of CO methods. In the lowest quartile of Doppler, 13% had elevated lactate (>2 mmol/L). In the lowest quartile of thermodilution, 36% had elevated lactate (>2 mmol/L). In ventilated OHCA patients, the two methods for estimating cardiac output correlated moderately and there was a consistent underestimation of Doppler-CO. Absolute cardiac output values from Doppler-CO should be interpreted with caution. However, Doppler can be used to exclude low cardiac output with high accuracy. TTM at 33°C did not negatively affect the correlation or bias of cardiac output measurements. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01020916.</p>","PeriodicalId":22972,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management","volume":"12 3","pages":"159-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Doppler Echocardiography and Thermodilution for Cardiac Output Measurements in a Contemporary Cohort of Comatose Cardiac Arrest Patients Undergoing Targeted Temperature Management.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Grand,&nbsp;Jesper Kjaergaard,&nbsp;Christian Hassager,&nbsp;Jacob Eifer Møller,&nbsp;John Bro-Jeppesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/ther.2021.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measuring cardiac output is used to guide treatment during postresuscitation care. The aim of this study was to compare Doppler echocardiography (Doppler-CO) with thermodilution using pulmonary artery catheters (PAC-CO) for cardiac output estimation in a large cohort of comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients undergoing targeted temperature management (TTM). Single-center substudy of 141 patients included in the TTM trial randomly assigned to 33 or 36°C for 24 hours after OHCA. Per protocol, PAC-CO and Doppler-CO were measured simultaneously shortly after admission and again at 24 and 48 hours. Linear correlation was assessed between methods and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Doppler to estimate low cardiac output (<3.5 L/min) was calculated. A total of 301 paired cardiac output measurements were available. Average cardiac output was 5.28 ± 1.94 L/min measured by thermodilution and 4.06 ± 1.49 L/min measured by Doppler with a mean bias of 1.22 L/min (limits of agreements -1.92 to 4.36 L/min). Correlation between methods was moderate (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.36). Using PAC-CO as the gold standard, PPV of a low cardiac output measurement (<3.5 L/min) by Doppler was 33%. However, the NPV was 92%. Hypothermia at 33°C did not negatively affect the correlations of CO methods. In the lowest quartile of Doppler, 13% had elevated lactate (>2 mmol/L). In the lowest quartile of thermodilution, 36% had elevated lactate (>2 mmol/L). In ventilated OHCA patients, the two methods for estimating cardiac output correlated moderately and there was a consistent underestimation of Doppler-CO. Absolute cardiac output values from Doppler-CO should be interpreted with caution. However, Doppler can be used to exclude low cardiac output with high accuracy. TTM at 33°C did not negatively affect the correlation or bias of cardiac output measurements. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01020916.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"159-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/ther.2021.0008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ther.2021.0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

心输出量的测量可用于指导复苏后护理的治疗。本研究的目的是比较多普勒超声心动图(多普勒- co)和使用肺动脉导管(PAC-CO)进行热稀释的多普勒超声心动图(多普勒- co)对接受靶向温度管理(TTM)的昏迷院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的心输出量的估计。纳入TTM试验的141例患者的单中心亚研究,在OHCA后24小时随机分配到33或36°C。根据方案,PAC-CO和多普勒- co在入院后不久同时测量,并在24和48小时再次测量。评估方法与多普勒预测低心输出量的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)之间的线性相关性(R2 = 0.36)。以PAC-CO为金标准,测定低心输出量PPV (2 mmol/L)。在热稀释最低四分之一组中,36%的小鼠乳酸水平升高(>2 mmol/L)。在通气的OHCA患者中,两种估算心输出量的方法相关性中等,且多普勒- co的低估一致。绝对心输出量的多普勒一氧化碳值应谨慎解释。然而,多普勒可以高精度地排除低心输出量。33°C时TTM对心输出量测量的相关性或偏倚没有负面影响。ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01020916。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Doppler Echocardiography and Thermodilution for Cardiac Output Measurements in a Contemporary Cohort of Comatose Cardiac Arrest Patients Undergoing Targeted Temperature Management.

Measuring cardiac output is used to guide treatment during postresuscitation care. The aim of this study was to compare Doppler echocardiography (Doppler-CO) with thermodilution using pulmonary artery catheters (PAC-CO) for cardiac output estimation in a large cohort of comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients undergoing targeted temperature management (TTM). Single-center substudy of 141 patients included in the TTM trial randomly assigned to 33 or 36°C for 24 hours after OHCA. Per protocol, PAC-CO and Doppler-CO were measured simultaneously shortly after admission and again at 24 and 48 hours. Linear correlation was assessed between methods and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Doppler to estimate low cardiac output (<3.5 L/min) was calculated. A total of 301 paired cardiac output measurements were available. Average cardiac output was 5.28 ± 1.94 L/min measured by thermodilution and 4.06 ± 1.49 L/min measured by Doppler with a mean bias of 1.22 L/min (limits of agreements -1.92 to 4.36 L/min). Correlation between methods was moderate (R2 = 0.36). Using PAC-CO as the gold standard, PPV of a low cardiac output measurement (<3.5 L/min) by Doppler was 33%. However, the NPV was 92%. Hypothermia at 33°C did not negatively affect the correlations of CO methods. In the lowest quartile of Doppler, 13% had elevated lactate (>2 mmol/L). In the lowest quartile of thermodilution, 36% had elevated lactate (>2 mmol/L). In ventilated OHCA patients, the two methods for estimating cardiac output correlated moderately and there was a consistent underestimation of Doppler-CO. Absolute cardiac output values from Doppler-CO should be interpreted with caution. However, Doppler can be used to exclude low cardiac output with high accuracy. TTM at 33°C did not negatively affect the correlation or bias of cardiac output measurements. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01020916.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management is the first and only journal to cover all aspects of hypothermia and temperature considerations relevant to this exciting field, including its application in cardiac arrest, spinal cord and traumatic brain injury, stroke, burns, and much more. The Journal provides a strong multidisciplinary forum to ensure that research advances are well disseminated, and that therapeutic hypothermia is well understood and used effectively to enhance patient outcomes. Novel findings from translational preclinical investigations as well as clinical studies and trials are featured in original articles, state-of-the-art review articles, protocols and best practices. Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management coverage includes: Temperature mechanisms and cooling strategies Protocols, risk factors, and drug interventions Intraoperative considerations Post-resuscitation cooling ICU management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信