细胞外囊泡(EVs)的分离与分析方法。

Zheng Zhao, Harshani Wijerathne, Andrew K Godwin, Steven A Soper
{"title":"细胞外囊泡(EVs)的分离与分析方法。","authors":"Zheng Zhao,&nbsp;Harshani Wijerathne,&nbsp;Andrew K Godwin,&nbsp;Steven A Soper","doi":"10.20517/evcna.2021.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as an evolving biomarker within the liquid biopsy family. While carrying both host cell proteins and different types of RNAs, EVs are also present in sufficient quantities in biological samples to be tested using many molecular analysis platforms to interrogate their content. However, because EVs in biological samples are comprised of both disease and non-disease related EVs, enrichment is often required to remove potential interferences from the downstream molecular assay. Most benchtop isolation/enrichment methods require > milliliter levels of sample and can cause varying degrees of damage to the EVs. In addition, some of the common EV benchtop isolation methods do not sort the diseased from the non-diseased related EVs. Simultaneously, the detection of the overall concentration and size distribution of the EVs is highly dependent on techniques such as electron microscopy and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis, which can include unexpected variations and biases as well as complexity in the analysis. This review discusses the importance of EVs as a biomarker secured from a liquid biopsy and covers some of the traditional and non-traditional, including microfluidics and resistive pulse sensing, technologies for EV isolation and detection, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":73008,"journal":{"name":"Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids","volume":"2 ","pages":"80-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372011/pdf/","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolation and analysis methods of extracellular vesicles (EVs).\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Zhao,&nbsp;Harshani Wijerathne,&nbsp;Andrew K Godwin,&nbsp;Steven A Soper\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/evcna.2021.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as an evolving biomarker within the liquid biopsy family. While carrying both host cell proteins and different types of RNAs, EVs are also present in sufficient quantities in biological samples to be tested using many molecular analysis platforms to interrogate their content. However, because EVs in biological samples are comprised of both disease and non-disease related EVs, enrichment is often required to remove potential interferences from the downstream molecular assay. Most benchtop isolation/enrichment methods require > milliliter levels of sample and can cause varying degrees of damage to the EVs. In addition, some of the common EV benchtop isolation methods do not sort the diseased from the non-diseased related EVs. Simultaneously, the detection of the overall concentration and size distribution of the EVs is highly dependent on techniques such as electron microscopy and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis, which can include unexpected variations and biases as well as complexity in the analysis. This review discusses the importance of EVs as a biomarker secured from a liquid biopsy and covers some of the traditional and non-traditional, including microfluidics and resistive pulse sensing, technologies for EV isolation and detection, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"80-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372011/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2021.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/3/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2021.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

细胞外囊泡(EVs)已被认为是液体活检家族中一个不断发展的生物标志物。在携带宿主细胞蛋白和不同类型rna的同时,ev在生物样品中也有足够数量的存在,可以使用许多分子分析平台来检测其含量。然而,由于生物样品中的ev由疾病和非疾病相关的ev组成,因此通常需要富集以消除下游分子分析的潜在干扰。大多数台式分离/富集方法需要>毫升级别的样品,并可能对ev造成不同程度的损害。此外,一些常见的台式隔离方法没有将患病的相关EV与非患病的相关EV进行分类。同时,电动汽车的总体浓度和大小分布的检测高度依赖于电子显微镜和纳米颗粒跟踪分析等技术,这些技术可能包括意想不到的变化和偏差以及分析中的复杂性。本文讨论了从液体活检中获得的EV作为生物标志物的重要性,并涵盖了一些传统和非传统的EV分离和检测技术,包括微流体技术和电阻脉冲传感技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Isolation and analysis methods of extracellular vesicles (EVs).

Isolation and analysis methods of extracellular vesicles (EVs).

Isolation and analysis methods of extracellular vesicles (EVs).

Isolation and analysis methods of extracellular vesicles (EVs).

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as an evolving biomarker within the liquid biopsy family. While carrying both host cell proteins and different types of RNAs, EVs are also present in sufficient quantities in biological samples to be tested using many molecular analysis platforms to interrogate their content. However, because EVs in biological samples are comprised of both disease and non-disease related EVs, enrichment is often required to remove potential interferences from the downstream molecular assay. Most benchtop isolation/enrichment methods require > milliliter levels of sample and can cause varying degrees of damage to the EVs. In addition, some of the common EV benchtop isolation methods do not sort the diseased from the non-diseased related EVs. Simultaneously, the detection of the overall concentration and size distribution of the EVs is highly dependent on techniques such as electron microscopy and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis, which can include unexpected variations and biases as well as complexity in the analysis. This review discusses the importance of EVs as a biomarker secured from a liquid biopsy and covers some of the traditional and non-traditional, including microfluidics and resistive pulse sensing, technologies for EV isolation and detection, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信