Brady J Anderson, Kasra N Fallah, Austin A Lignieres, Joseph K Moffitt, Kim-Loan Luu, Alfredo Cepeda, Irene L Doringo, Phuong D Nguyen, John F Teichgraeber, Matthew R Greives
{"title":"原发性腭裂修复术后腭咽功能不全的预测因素。","authors":"Brady J Anderson, Kasra N Fallah, Austin A Lignieres, Joseph K Moffitt, Kim-Loan Luu, Alfredo Cepeda, Irene L Doringo, Phuong D Nguyen, John F Teichgraeber, Matthew R Greives","doi":"10.1177/10556656211026861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) remains a known complication of primary palatoplasty. We sought to identify factors associated with the incidence of VPI and create a predictive model for VPI development in our population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-institution, retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multidisciplinary clinic in a tertiary academic institution.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 453 consecutive patients undergoing primary palatoplasty from 1999 to 2016 were reviewed. Inclusion required follow-up past age 5. Patients who were non-verbal, and thus unable to undergo speech evaluation, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome was VPI, defined as revision palatoplasty or recommendation by speech-language pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 318 patients included, 179 (56%) were male. Median age at primary repair was 1.0 years (0.9-1.1) with a median age of 8.8 years at last follow-up. One hundred nineteen (37%) patients developed VPI at a median age of 5.0 years (3.8-6.5). Higher rates were seen with posterior fistula (65% vs 14%, <i>P</i> <.01) and straight-line repair (41% vs 9%, <i>P</i> <.01), with lower rates in patients with Veau I clefts (22% vs 39%, <i>P</i> <.05). Patients with VPI were older at last follow-up. Following multivariate regression, factors remaining significant were posterior fistula (odds ratio [OR]: 11.3, 95% CI: 6.1-22.0), primary Furlow repair (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-0.68), genetic diagnoses (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.1-7.9), and age at last follow-up (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Length of follow-up, posterior fistulae, and genetic diagnoses are associated with VPI formation. Furlow repair may protect against formation of VPI. Use of allograft, Veau class, birth type, birth weight, and race are not independently associated with VPI formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520794,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","volume":" ","pages":"825-832"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Factors for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Primary Cleft Palate Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Brady J Anderson, Kasra N Fallah, Austin A Lignieres, Joseph K Moffitt, Kim-Loan Luu, Alfredo Cepeda, Irene L Doringo, Phuong D Nguyen, John F Teichgraeber, Matthew R Greives\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656211026861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) remains a known complication of primary palatoplasty. We sought to identify factors associated with the incidence of VPI and create a predictive model for VPI development in our population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-institution, retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multidisciplinary clinic in a tertiary academic institution.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 453 consecutive patients undergoing primary palatoplasty from 1999 to 2016 were reviewed. Inclusion required follow-up past age 5. Patients who were non-verbal, and thus unable to undergo speech evaluation, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome was VPI, defined as revision palatoplasty or recommendation by speech-language pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 318 patients included, 179 (56%) were male. Median age at primary repair was 1.0 years (0.9-1.1) with a median age of 8.8 years at last follow-up. One hundred nineteen (37%) patients developed VPI at a median age of 5.0 years (3.8-6.5). Higher rates were seen with posterior fistula (65% vs 14%, <i>P</i> <.01) and straight-line repair (41% vs 9%, <i>P</i> <.01), with lower rates in patients with Veau I clefts (22% vs 39%, <i>P</i> <.05). Patients with VPI were older at last follow-up. Following multivariate regression, factors remaining significant were posterior fistula (odds ratio [OR]: 11.3, 95% CI: 6.1-22.0), primary Furlow repair (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-0.68), genetic diagnoses (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.1-7.9), and age at last follow-up (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Length of follow-up, posterior fistulae, and genetic diagnoses are associated with VPI formation. Furlow repair may protect against formation of VPI. Use of allograft, Veau class, birth type, birth weight, and race are not independently associated with VPI formation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"825-832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211026861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211026861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
目的:腭咽功能不全(VPI)是一种已知的初级腭成形术并发症。我们试图确定与VPI发病率相关的因素,并建立VPI在我们人群中发展的预测模型。设计:单机构回顾性研究。环境:高等院校的多学科诊所。患者:我们回顾了1999年至2016年连续453例接受初级腭成形术的患者。纳入要求随访至5岁以上。没有语言能力,因此无法进行语言评估的患者被排除在外。主要结局指标:主要结局指标为VPI,定义为腭裂修补术或语言病理学推荐。结果:318例患者中,男性179例(56%)。初次修复时的中位年龄为1.0岁(0.9-1.1岁),末次随访时的中位年龄为8.8岁。119例(37%)患者在中位年龄为5.0岁(3.8-6.5岁)时发生VPI。后瘘发生率较高(65% vs 14%, P P P P)结论:随访时间、后瘘和遗传诊断与VPI形成有关。沟槽修复可以防止VPI的形成。同种异体移植物的使用、Veau类别、出生类型、出生体重和种族与VPI的形成并不是独立相关的。
Predictive Factors for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Primary Cleft Palate Repair.
Objective: Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) remains a known complication of primary palatoplasty. We sought to identify factors associated with the incidence of VPI and create a predictive model for VPI development in our population.
Design: A single-institution, retrospective review.
Setting: Multidisciplinary clinic in a tertiary academic institution.
Patients: A total of 453 consecutive patients undergoing primary palatoplasty from 1999 to 2016 were reviewed. Inclusion required follow-up past age 5. Patients who were non-verbal, and thus unable to undergo speech evaluation, were excluded.
Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was VPI, defined as revision palatoplasty or recommendation by speech-language pathology.
Results: Of 318 patients included, 179 (56%) were male. Median age at primary repair was 1.0 years (0.9-1.1) with a median age of 8.8 years at last follow-up. One hundred nineteen (37%) patients developed VPI at a median age of 5.0 years (3.8-6.5). Higher rates were seen with posterior fistula (65% vs 14%, P <.01) and straight-line repair (41% vs 9%, P <.01), with lower rates in patients with Veau I clefts (22% vs 39%, P <.05). Patients with VPI were older at last follow-up. Following multivariate regression, factors remaining significant were posterior fistula (odds ratio [OR]: 11.3, 95% CI: 6.1-22.0), primary Furlow repair (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-0.68), genetic diagnoses (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.1-7.9), and age at last follow-up (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.2).
Conclusions: Length of follow-up, posterior fistulae, and genetic diagnoses are associated with VPI formation. Furlow repair may protect against formation of VPI. Use of allograft, Veau class, birth type, birth weight, and race are not independently associated with VPI formation.