希腊版人格障碍半结构化临床访谈表(SCID-II)的效度和信度。

Q3 Medicine
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Pub Date : 2021-12-20 Epub Date: 2021-08-05 DOI:10.22365/jpsych.2021.033
Theofanis Vorvolakos, Marina Gymnopoulou, Vasiliki Keramida, Arsenia Malakozi, Aikaterini Arvaniti, Aspasia Serdari, Maria Samakouri
{"title":"希腊版人格障碍半结构化临床访谈表(SCID-II)的效度和信度。","authors":"Theofanis Vorvolakos, Marina Gymnopoulou, Vasiliki Keramida, Arsenia Malakozi, Aikaterini Arvaniti, Aspasia Serdari, Maria Samakouri","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2021.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The semistructured Schedule of Clinical Interview for Personality Disorders (SCID-II) is a useful tool for measuring personality disorders according to DSM criteria. Personality traits and their assessment are culturally sensitive. Because of this, it is important for clinicians and researchers to have a clearer view of the performance of such instruments in their own culture. Despite the fact that the SCID-II interview has been translated to the Greek language, the psychometric properties of this version have yet to be tested. To address this need, we conducted this study to assess the validity and reliability of the SCID-II interview in its DSM-III-R version in the Greek population. A total of 32 patients, 13 men and 19 women, were involved in this study. Sixteen patients were interviewed three times by three different interviewers. The first two interviewers used the Greek version of the SCID-II, and the third interviewer used the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE), which was used as the gold standard. Of the remaining 16 patients, 14 were interviewed with the SCID-II by two interviewers, and 2 were unable to complete the interview and were excluded from the study. A total of 69 interviews were performed. The internal consistency of the interview was acceptable, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.623. The SCID-II also demonstrated good reliability. Cohen's Kappa score ranged between 0.375 for histrionic disorder and 1.000 for defeatism and antisocial personality disorder. Pearson's correlation coefficient was also very strong for both the individual criteria score and the overall diagnosis between the interviewers. There was an exception for the not otherwise specified personality disorder, where there was no agreement in any of the reliability measures between the interviewers. The interview validity was high when measured against the gold standard. The specificity of the SCID-II ranged from 79-100%, with the expectation of not otherwise specified personality disorder being 66%. The overall sensitivity was moderate and ranged from 0-100%. The Greek version of the SCID-II is a reliable, valid and easy-to-use instrument that can be adopted by various mental health professionals for clinical as well as research purposes.","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the semistructured Schedule Clinical Interview for personality disorders (SCID-II).\",\"authors\":\"Theofanis Vorvolakos, Marina Gymnopoulou, Vasiliki Keramida, Arsenia Malakozi, Aikaterini Arvaniti, Aspasia Serdari, Maria Samakouri\",\"doi\":\"10.22365/jpsych.2021.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The semistructured Schedule of Clinical Interview for Personality Disorders (SCID-II) is a useful tool for measuring personality disorders according to DSM criteria. Personality traits and their assessment are culturally sensitive. Because of this, it is important for clinicians and researchers to have a clearer view of the performance of such instruments in their own culture. Despite the fact that the SCID-II interview has been translated to the Greek language, the psychometric properties of this version have yet to be tested. To address this need, we conducted this study to assess the validity and reliability of the SCID-II interview in its DSM-III-R version in the Greek population. A total of 32 patients, 13 men and 19 women, were involved in this study. Sixteen patients were interviewed three times by three different interviewers. The first two interviewers used the Greek version of the SCID-II, and the third interviewer used the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE), which was used as the gold standard. Of the remaining 16 patients, 14 were interviewed with the SCID-II by two interviewers, and 2 were unable to complete the interview and were excluded from the study. A total of 69 interviews were performed. The internal consistency of the interview was acceptable, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.623. The SCID-II also demonstrated good reliability. Cohen's Kappa score ranged between 0.375 for histrionic disorder and 1.000 for defeatism and antisocial personality disorder. Pearson's correlation coefficient was also very strong for both the individual criteria score and the overall diagnosis between the interviewers. There was an exception for the not otherwise specified personality disorder, where there was no agreement in any of the reliability measures between the interviewers. The interview validity was high when measured against the gold standard. The specificity of the SCID-II ranged from 79-100%, with the expectation of not otherwise specified personality disorder being 66%. The overall sensitivity was moderate and ranged from 0-100%. The Greek version of the SCID-II is a reliable, valid and easy-to-use instrument that can be adopted by various mental health professionals for clinical as well as research purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2021.033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2021.033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半结构化人格障碍临床访谈表(SCID-II)是根据DSM标准测量人格障碍的有用工具。性格特征及其评估具有文化敏感性。正因为如此,对于临床医生和研究人员来说,更清楚地了解这些仪器在他们自己的文化中的表现是很重要的。尽管SCID-II访谈已被翻译成希腊语,但该版本的心理测量学特性还有待测试。为了满足这一需求,我们进行了这项研究,以评估其DSM-III-R版SCID-II访谈在希腊人群中的有效性和可靠性。共有32名患者,13名男性和19名女性参与了这项研究。16名患者由3位不同的采访者进行了3次访谈。前两位采访者使用的是希腊版SCID-II,第三位采访者使用的是作为金标准的国际人格障碍检查(IPDE)。在剩余的16例患者中,14例由2位采访者用SCID-II进行了访谈,2例因无法完成访谈而被排除在研究之外。共进行了69次访谈。访谈的内部一致性是可以接受的,Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.623。SCID-II也表现出良好的可靠性。科恩的Kappa分数在表演障碍的0.375和失败主义和反社会人格障碍的1000之间。皮尔逊相关系数也非常强的个人标准得分和采访者之间的整体诊断。对于没有特别说明的人格障碍有一个例外,在任何可靠性测量中,采访者之间都没有达成一致。与金标准相比,访谈效度较高。SCID-II的特异性范围为79% -100%,而非其他特定人格障碍的预期为66%。总体敏感性为中等,范围为0-100%。SCID-II的希腊文版是一种可靠、有效和易于使用的工具,可被各种精神卫生专业人员用于临床和研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the semistructured Schedule Clinical Interview for personality disorders (SCID-II).
The semistructured Schedule of Clinical Interview for Personality Disorders (SCID-II) is a useful tool for measuring personality disorders according to DSM criteria. Personality traits and their assessment are culturally sensitive. Because of this, it is important for clinicians and researchers to have a clearer view of the performance of such instruments in their own culture. Despite the fact that the SCID-II interview has been translated to the Greek language, the psychometric properties of this version have yet to be tested. To address this need, we conducted this study to assess the validity and reliability of the SCID-II interview in its DSM-III-R version in the Greek population. A total of 32 patients, 13 men and 19 women, were involved in this study. Sixteen patients were interviewed three times by three different interviewers. The first two interviewers used the Greek version of the SCID-II, and the third interviewer used the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE), which was used as the gold standard. Of the remaining 16 patients, 14 were interviewed with the SCID-II by two interviewers, and 2 were unable to complete the interview and were excluded from the study. A total of 69 interviews were performed. The internal consistency of the interview was acceptable, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.623. The SCID-II also demonstrated good reliability. Cohen's Kappa score ranged between 0.375 for histrionic disorder and 1.000 for defeatism and antisocial personality disorder. Pearson's correlation coefficient was also very strong for both the individual criteria score and the overall diagnosis between the interviewers. There was an exception for the not otherwise specified personality disorder, where there was no agreement in any of the reliability measures between the interviewers. The interview validity was high when measured against the gold standard. The specificity of the SCID-II ranged from 79-100%, with the expectation of not otherwise specified personality disorder being 66%. The overall sensitivity was moderate and ranged from 0-100%. The Greek version of the SCID-II is a reliable, valid and easy-to-use instrument that can be adopted by various mental health professionals for clinical as well as research purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信