来自发展中国家的低甲基化药物+venetoclax诱导治疗不适合强化化疗的急性髓系白血病-缩短venetoclax持续时间和基线感染患者的新途径

American journal of blood research Pub Date : 2021-06-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01
Sumeet Mirgh, Archana Sharma, Mohammad Rizwan Mohammad Anwar Shaikh, Kirti Kadian, Narendra Agrawal, Vishvdeep Khushoo, Pallavi Mehta, Rayaz Ahmed, Dinesh Bhurani
{"title":"来自发展中国家的低甲基化药物+venetoclax诱导治疗不适合强化化疗的急性髓系白血病-缩短venetoclax持续时间和基线感染患者的新途径","authors":"Sumeet Mirgh,&nbsp;Archana Sharma,&nbsp;Mohammad Rizwan Mohammad Anwar Shaikh,&nbsp;Kirti Kadian,&nbsp;Narendra Agrawal,&nbsp;Vishvdeep Khushoo,&nbsp;Pallavi Mehta,&nbsp;Rayaz Ahmed,&nbsp;Dinesh Bhurani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and those with baseline infections, when treated with intensive chemotherapy, are associated with high induction mortality. We report 24 patients (16-newly-diagnosed, 8-relapsed/refractory) with AML deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy (by virtue of age >60 years, ECOG-PS 3-4, or those with non-resolving infections at baseline), treated with azacytidine-venetoclax combination as induction chemotherapy. Median follow-up of the study group was 8 months. The overall complete remission (CR)+CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 58.3%. 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival of the whole cohort was 44.4% and 55.8%, respectively. On subgroup analysis, newly-diagnosed AML (p=0.05), intermediate-risk cytogenetics (p=0.007), and HMA-naïve (p=0.05) patients had a significantly better outcome. AML patients with baseline infections (versus without infections) treated with azacytidine-venetoclax induction, have lesser induction mortality (compared with historic intensive chemotherapy) with equivalent response rates. A detailed analysis amongst cohorts with different venetoclax durations revealed that, shorter duration (<21 days) venetoclax (versus 21-28 days duration) in induction therapy leads to similar response rates and similar severity of myelosuppression, however, with early count recovery and lesser duration of intravenous antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7479,"journal":{"name":"American journal of blood research","volume":"11 3","pages":"290-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8303019/pdf/ajbr0011-0290.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypomethylating agents+venetoclax induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy - novel avenues for lesser venetoclax duration and patients with baseline infections from a developing country.\",\"authors\":\"Sumeet Mirgh,&nbsp;Archana Sharma,&nbsp;Mohammad Rizwan Mohammad Anwar Shaikh,&nbsp;Kirti Kadian,&nbsp;Narendra Agrawal,&nbsp;Vishvdeep Khushoo,&nbsp;Pallavi Mehta,&nbsp;Rayaz Ahmed,&nbsp;Dinesh Bhurani\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Both elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and those with baseline infections, when treated with intensive chemotherapy, are associated with high induction mortality. We report 24 patients (16-newly-diagnosed, 8-relapsed/refractory) with AML deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy (by virtue of age >60 years, ECOG-PS 3-4, or those with non-resolving infections at baseline), treated with azacytidine-venetoclax combination as induction chemotherapy. Median follow-up of the study group was 8 months. The overall complete remission (CR)+CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 58.3%. 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival of the whole cohort was 44.4% and 55.8%, respectively. On subgroup analysis, newly-diagnosed AML (p=0.05), intermediate-risk cytogenetics (p=0.007), and HMA-naïve (p=0.05) patients had a significantly better outcome. AML patients with baseline infections (versus without infections) treated with azacytidine-venetoclax induction, have lesser induction mortality (compared with historic intensive chemotherapy) with equivalent response rates. A detailed analysis amongst cohorts with different venetoclax durations revealed that, shorter duration (<21 days) venetoclax (versus 21-28 days duration) in induction therapy leads to similar response rates and similar severity of myelosuppression, however, with early count recovery and lesser duration of intravenous antibiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of blood research\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"290-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8303019/pdf/ajbr0011-0290.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of blood research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of blood research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年急性髓性白血病(AML)患者和基线感染患者在接受强化化疗治疗时,均与高诱发死亡率相关。我们报告了24例AML患者(16例新诊断,8例复发/难治性),认为不适合强化化疗(由于年龄>60岁,ECOG-PS 3-4,或基线时未解决感染),采用氮扎胞苷-venetoclax联合诱导化疗。研究组中位随访为8个月。总完全缓解(CR)+不完全计数恢复(CRi)率为58.3%。整个队列的1年无进展生存率和总生存率分别为44.4%和55.8%。在亚组分析中,新诊断的AML (p=0.05)、中危细胞遗传学(p=0.007)和HMA-naïve (p=0.05)患者的预后明显更好。基线感染(与未感染)的AML患者接受阿扎胞苷-venetoclax诱导治疗,诱导死亡率较低(与历史强化化疗相比),反应率相同。对不同静脉注射持续时间的队列进行的详细分析显示,持续时间较短(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hypomethylating agents+venetoclax induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy - novel avenues for lesser venetoclax duration and patients with baseline infections from a developing country.

Both elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and those with baseline infections, when treated with intensive chemotherapy, are associated with high induction mortality. We report 24 patients (16-newly-diagnosed, 8-relapsed/refractory) with AML deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy (by virtue of age >60 years, ECOG-PS 3-4, or those with non-resolving infections at baseline), treated with azacytidine-venetoclax combination as induction chemotherapy. Median follow-up of the study group was 8 months. The overall complete remission (CR)+CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 58.3%. 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival of the whole cohort was 44.4% and 55.8%, respectively. On subgroup analysis, newly-diagnosed AML (p=0.05), intermediate-risk cytogenetics (p=0.007), and HMA-naïve (p=0.05) patients had a significantly better outcome. AML patients with baseline infections (versus without infections) treated with azacytidine-venetoclax induction, have lesser induction mortality (compared with historic intensive chemotherapy) with equivalent response rates. A detailed analysis amongst cohorts with different venetoclax durations revealed that, shorter duration (<21 days) venetoclax (versus 21-28 days duration) in induction therapy leads to similar response rates and similar severity of myelosuppression, however, with early count recovery and lesser duration of intravenous antibiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of blood research
American journal of blood research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信