快速和简单的测试评估严重程度的急性外侧踝关节扭伤

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Yuki Noda , Shuji Horibe , Kunihiko Hiramatsu , Rikio Takao , Kenji Fujita
{"title":"快速和简单的测试评估严重程度的急性外侧踝关节扭伤","authors":"Yuki Noda ,&nbsp;Shuji Horibe ,&nbsp;Kunihiko Hiramatsu ,&nbsp;Rikio Takao ,&nbsp;Kenji Fujita","doi":"10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objective</h3><p>For early return to sports after a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) and recurrence prevention, effective rehabilitation and gradual return to sports should be initiated while predicting the return time based on the appropriate severity evaluation immediately after injury. However, since severity evaluations performed in previous studies required large space and stairs and involved high-revel activity, their use as a test and index to evaluate severity after LAS was not appropriate considering convenience and risk of re-injury. Therefore, a quick and simple test was developed to evaluate the severity of acute LAS. This study aimed to verify the association between ankle function for severity evaluation and anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) injury type by ultrasonography and to clarify the usefulness for acute LAS severity evaluation of the single-leg loading (SLL) test.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 50 patients (34 men, 16 women) out of 58 patients who visited our sports clinic within 3 days after acute LAS and who conformed to the study criteria were included in this study. During the first visit, SLL test and objective/subjective ankle joint evaluation were performed. The SLL test consists of single-leg standing, single-leg heel raising and single-leg hopping, and patients were classified into four levels from 1 to 4 according to results. In addition, ultrasonographic evaluation was performed within 1 week after the first visit to evaluate the type of ATFL injury. Type I was defined as intact ATFL, Type II as swollen ATFL with an almost intact fibrillar pattern and Type III as ATFL appearing swollen with a disrupted fibrillar pattern. The relationship between the SLL test and each evaluation item was investigated using Spearman's correlation coefficient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As a result of the SLL test, 15 patients had Level 1 (30%), 19 Level 2 (38%), 5 Level 3 (10%) and 11 Level 4 (22%). With regard to correlation coefficients of the SLL test, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot ankle/hindfoot scale and sports activity were r<sub>s</sub> = 0.71 (p &lt; 0.001) and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.66 (p &lt; 0.001), respectively, showing a significant positive correlation. SLL test and the type of ATFL injury also showed a significant negative correlation (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.58, p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The SLL test was a simple and useful test that can be used as an index to evaluate the severity of acute LAS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44283,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quick and simple test to evaluate severity of acute lateral ankle sprain\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Noda ,&nbsp;Shuji Horibe ,&nbsp;Kunihiko Hiramatsu ,&nbsp;Rikio Takao ,&nbsp;Kenji Fujita\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/objective</h3><p>For early return to sports after a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) and recurrence prevention, effective rehabilitation and gradual return to sports should be initiated while predicting the return time based on the appropriate severity evaluation immediately after injury. However, since severity evaluations performed in previous studies required large space and stairs and involved high-revel activity, their use as a test and index to evaluate severity after LAS was not appropriate considering convenience and risk of re-injury. Therefore, a quick and simple test was developed to evaluate the severity of acute LAS. This study aimed to verify the association between ankle function for severity evaluation and anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) injury type by ultrasonography and to clarify the usefulness for acute LAS severity evaluation of the single-leg loading (SLL) test.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 50 patients (34 men, 16 women) out of 58 patients who visited our sports clinic within 3 days after acute LAS and who conformed to the study criteria were included in this study. During the first visit, SLL test and objective/subjective ankle joint evaluation were performed. The SLL test consists of single-leg standing, single-leg heel raising and single-leg hopping, and patients were classified into four levels from 1 to 4 according to results. In addition, ultrasonographic evaluation was performed within 1 week after the first visit to evaluate the type of ATFL injury. Type I was defined as intact ATFL, Type II as swollen ATFL with an almost intact fibrillar pattern and Type III as ATFL appearing swollen with a disrupted fibrillar pattern. The relationship between the SLL test and each evaluation item was investigated using Spearman's correlation coefficient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As a result of the SLL test, 15 patients had Level 1 (30%), 19 Level 2 (38%), 5 Level 3 (10%) and 11 Level 4 (22%). With regard to correlation coefficients of the SLL test, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot ankle/hindfoot scale and sports activity were r<sub>s</sub> = 0.71 (p &lt; 0.001) and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.66 (p &lt; 0.001), respectively, showing a significant positive correlation. SLL test and the type of ATFL injury also showed a significant negative correlation (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.58, p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The SLL test was a simple and useful test that can be used as an index to evaluate the severity of acute LAS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.asmart.2021.05.003\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221468732100011X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221468732100011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景/目的为了在踝关节外侧扭伤(LAS)后尽早恢复运动和预防复发,在损伤后立即根据适当的严重程度评估预测恢复时间的同时,应开始有效的康复和逐渐恢复运动。然而,由于以往的研究中进行的严重程度评估需要较大的空间和楼梯,并且涉及高强度的活动,因此考虑到方便性和再次损伤的风险,将其作为评估LAS后严重程度的测试和指标并不合适。因此,开发了一种快速简便的方法来评估急性LAS的严重程度。本研究旨在通过超声检查验证踝关节功能严重程度评估与距腓骨前韧带(ATFL)损伤类型之间的关系,并阐明单腿负荷(SLL)试验对急性LAS严重程度评估的有效性。方法从58例急性LAS术后3天内就诊的患者中,选取50例符合研究标准的患者(男34例,女16例)纳入本研究。首次访视时进行SLL测试和客观/主观踝关节评估。SLL测试包括单腿站立、单腿抬脚跟和单腿跳跃,根据结果将患者分为1 ~ 4级。首次就诊后1周内进行超声评估,判断ATFL损伤类型。I型被定义为完整的ATFL, II型被定义为肿胀的ATFL,几乎完整的纤维模式,III型被定义为肿胀的ATFL,纤维模式被破坏。采用Spearman相关系数考察SLL检验与各评价项目之间的关系。结果经SLL检查,1级15例(30%),2级19例(38%),3级5例(10%),4级11例(22%)。关于SLL检验的相关系数,日本足外科学会踝关节/后足量表与运动活动的相关系数为rs = 0.71 (p <0.001), rs = 0.66 (p <0.001),显示出显著的正相关。SLL检验与ATFL损伤类型也呈显著负相关(rs = - 0.58, p <0.001)。结论SLL试验是一种简便、有效的评价急性LAS严重程度的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quick and simple test to evaluate severity of acute lateral ankle sprain

Quick and simple test to evaluate severity of acute lateral ankle sprain

Quick and simple test to evaluate severity of acute lateral ankle sprain

Background/objective

For early return to sports after a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) and recurrence prevention, effective rehabilitation and gradual return to sports should be initiated while predicting the return time based on the appropriate severity evaluation immediately after injury. However, since severity evaluations performed in previous studies required large space and stairs and involved high-revel activity, their use as a test and index to evaluate severity after LAS was not appropriate considering convenience and risk of re-injury. Therefore, a quick and simple test was developed to evaluate the severity of acute LAS. This study aimed to verify the association between ankle function for severity evaluation and anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) injury type by ultrasonography and to clarify the usefulness for acute LAS severity evaluation of the single-leg loading (SLL) test.

Methods

In total, 50 patients (34 men, 16 women) out of 58 patients who visited our sports clinic within 3 days after acute LAS and who conformed to the study criteria were included in this study. During the first visit, SLL test and objective/subjective ankle joint evaluation were performed. The SLL test consists of single-leg standing, single-leg heel raising and single-leg hopping, and patients were classified into four levels from 1 to 4 according to results. In addition, ultrasonographic evaluation was performed within 1 week after the first visit to evaluate the type of ATFL injury. Type I was defined as intact ATFL, Type II as swollen ATFL with an almost intact fibrillar pattern and Type III as ATFL appearing swollen with a disrupted fibrillar pattern. The relationship between the SLL test and each evaluation item was investigated using Spearman's correlation coefficient.

Results

As a result of the SLL test, 15 patients had Level 1 (30%), 19 Level 2 (38%), 5 Level 3 (10%) and 11 Level 4 (22%). With regard to correlation coefficients of the SLL test, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot ankle/hindfoot scale and sports activity were rs = 0.71 (p < 0.001) and rs = 0.66 (p < 0.001), respectively, showing a significant positive correlation. SLL test and the type of ATFL injury also showed a significant negative correlation (rs = −0.58, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The SLL test was a simple and useful test that can be used as an index to evaluate the severity of acute LAS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology (AP-SMART) is the official peer-reviewed, open access journal of the Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society (APKASS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Society of Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine (JOSKAS). It is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by Elsevier. The mission of AP-SMART is to inspire clinicians, practitioners, scientists and engineers to work towards a common goal to improve quality of life in the international community. The Journal publishes original research, reviews, editorials, perspectives, and letters to the Editor. Multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines will be the trend in the coming decades. AP-SMART provides a platform for the exchange of new clinical and scientific information in the most precise and expeditious way to achieve timely dissemination of information and cross-fertilization of ideas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信