COVID-19大流行期间堕胎服务的可用性:美国全国堕胎设施普查的结果

Q2 Medicine
Shelly Kaller , M.G. Isabel Muñoz , Subeksha Sharma , Salma Tayel , Chris Ahlbach , Clara Cook , Ushma D. Upadhyay
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间堕胎服务的可用性:美国全国堕胎设施普查的结果","authors":"Shelly Kaller ,&nbsp;M.G. Isabel Muñoz ,&nbsp;Subeksha Sharma ,&nbsp;Salma Tayel ,&nbsp;Chris Ahlbach ,&nbsp;Clara Cook ,&nbsp;Ushma D. Upadhyay","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2021.100067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study assessed the impact of COVID-19 on abortion services in all 50 United States states and the District of Columbia.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>ANSIRH's Abortion Facility Database is a systematic collection of data on all publicly-advertising abortion facilities in the United States, updated annually through online searches and mystery shopper phone calls. Research staff updated the database in May-August 2020, assessing the number of facilities that closed, limited or stopped providing abortions, and provided telehealth options in summer 2020 due to COVID-19.  We describe these changes using frequencies and highlighting themes and examples from coded qualitative data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Located primarily in the South and Midwest, 24 of 751 facilities that were open in 2019 temporarily closed due to the pandemic, with 9 still closed by August 2020. Other facilities described suspending abortions, referring abortion patients to other facilities, or limiting services to medication abortion. While most facilities required in-person visits for reasons like state abortion restrictions, 22% (<em>n</em> = 150) offered phone or telehealth consultations, no-test visits, or medication abortion by mail to reduce or eliminate patient time in the clinic. Some facilities used creative strategies to reduce COVID-19 risk like allowing patients to wait for visits in their cars or offering drive-through medication pick-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic caused several disruptions to abortion service availability, including closures. To reduce in-person visit time, some clinics shifted to offering medication abortion (versus procedural) or telehealth. While the pandemic and abortion restrictions increased barriers to abortion provision, facilities were resilient and adapted to provide safe care for their patients.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Barriers to abortion access were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in areas of the country with more restrictive policies toward abortion. Telehealth care protocols offered by many abortion facilities provide an option to reduce or eliminate in-person visits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2021.100067","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion service availability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a national census of abortion facilities in the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Shelly Kaller ,&nbsp;M.G. Isabel Muñoz ,&nbsp;Subeksha Sharma ,&nbsp;Salma Tayel ,&nbsp;Chris Ahlbach ,&nbsp;Clara Cook ,&nbsp;Ushma D. Upadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2021.100067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study assessed the impact of COVID-19 on abortion services in all 50 United States states and the District of Columbia.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>ANSIRH's Abortion Facility Database is a systematic collection of data on all publicly-advertising abortion facilities in the United States, updated annually through online searches and mystery shopper phone calls. Research staff updated the database in May-August 2020, assessing the number of facilities that closed, limited or stopped providing abortions, and provided telehealth options in summer 2020 due to COVID-19.  We describe these changes using frequencies and highlighting themes and examples from coded qualitative data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Located primarily in the South and Midwest, 24 of 751 facilities that were open in 2019 temporarily closed due to the pandemic, with 9 still closed by August 2020. Other facilities described suspending abortions, referring abortion patients to other facilities, or limiting services to medication abortion. While most facilities required in-person visits for reasons like state abortion restrictions, 22% (<em>n</em> = 150) offered phone or telehealth consultations, no-test visits, or medication abortion by mail to reduce or eliminate patient time in the clinic. Some facilities used creative strategies to reduce COVID-19 risk like allowing patients to wait for visits in their cars or offering drive-through medication pick-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic caused several disruptions to abortion service availability, including closures. To reduce in-person visit time, some clinics shifted to offering medication abortion (versus procedural) or telehealth. While the pandemic and abortion restrictions increased barriers to abortion provision, facilities were resilient and adapted to provide safe care for their patients.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Barriers to abortion access were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in areas of the country with more restrictive policies toward abortion. Telehealth care protocols offered by many abortion facilities provide an option to reduce or eliminate in-person visits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2021.100067\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151621000149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151621000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的本研究评估了COVID-19对美国所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区堕胎服务的影响。研究设计ansirh的堕胎设施数据库是美国所有公开宣传堕胎设施的系统数据收集,每年通过在线搜索和神秘购物者电话更新。研究人员于2020年5月至8月更新了数据库,评估了因COVID-19而关闭、限制或停止提供堕胎服务的设施数量,并在2020年夏季提供了远程医疗选择。我们使用频率和突出主题以及编码定性数据中的示例来描述这些变化。结果主要位于南部和中西部,2019年开放的751个设施中有24个因大流行而暂时关闭,到2020年8月仍有9个关闭。其他机构描述了暂停堕胎、将堕胎患者转介到其他机构或限制药物流产服务。虽然大多数机构由于国家堕胎限制等原因需要亲自就诊,但22% (n = 150)提供电话或远程医疗咨询、无检查就诊或通过邮件进行药物流产,以减少或消除患者在诊所的时间。一些机构采用了创造性的策略来降低COVID-19的风险,例如允许患者在车内等待就诊或提供免下车取药服务。2019冠状病毒病大流行对堕胎服务的提供造成了几次中断,包括关闭。为了减少亲自就诊的时间,一些诊所转向提供药物流产(相对于程序流产)或远程医疗。虽然大流行病和堕胎限制增加了提供堕胎服务的障碍,但设施具有复原力,并经过调整,可以为患者提供安全护理。影响在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,堕胎障碍加剧,特别是在该国对堕胎政策限制较多的地区。许多堕胎设施提供的远程保健协议提供了减少或消除亲自就诊的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abortion service availability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a national census of abortion facilities in the U.S.

Objective

This study assessed the impact of COVID-19 on abortion services in all 50 United States states and the District of Columbia.

Study design

ANSIRH's Abortion Facility Database is a systematic collection of data on all publicly-advertising abortion facilities in the United States, updated annually through online searches and mystery shopper phone calls. Research staff updated the database in May-August 2020, assessing the number of facilities that closed, limited or stopped providing abortions, and provided telehealth options in summer 2020 due to COVID-19.  We describe these changes using frequencies and highlighting themes and examples from coded qualitative data.

Results

Located primarily in the South and Midwest, 24 of 751 facilities that were open in 2019 temporarily closed due to the pandemic, with 9 still closed by August 2020. Other facilities described suspending abortions, referring abortion patients to other facilities, or limiting services to medication abortion. While most facilities required in-person visits for reasons like state abortion restrictions, 22% (n = 150) offered phone or telehealth consultations, no-test visits, or medication abortion by mail to reduce or eliminate patient time in the clinic. Some facilities used creative strategies to reduce COVID-19 risk like allowing patients to wait for visits in their cars or offering drive-through medication pick-up.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic caused several disruptions to abortion service availability, including closures. To reduce in-person visit time, some clinics shifted to offering medication abortion (versus procedural) or telehealth. While the pandemic and abortion restrictions increased barriers to abortion provision, facilities were resilient and adapted to provide safe care for their patients.

Implications

Barriers to abortion access were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in areas of the country with more restrictive policies toward abortion. Telehealth care protocols offered by many abortion facilities provide an option to reduce or eliminate in-person visits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信